+7 925 966 4690, 9am – 6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Finance and Credit
 

The evolution of the Russian Central Bank's monetary policy tools

ISSUE 9, SEPTEMBER 2026

Received: 21 January 2026

Accepted: 2 February 2026

Available online: 30 September 2026

Subject Heading: THEORY OF FINANCE

JEL Classification: C45, D14, E21, G51, G28

Pages: 84-101

https://doi.org/10.24891/udxwav

Valerii V. SMIRNOV I.N. Ulianov Chuvash State University (ChuvSU), Cheboksary, Chuvash Republic, Russian Federation
v2v3s4@mail.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6198-3157

Subject. The evolution of the Bank of Russia’s monetary policy toolkit under the influence of structural shifts.
Objectives. To describe the evolution of the monetary policy toolkit and provide quantitative verification of structural shifts, to identify systemic contradictions, and to develop the outlines of a sustainable paradigm of adaptive regulation.
Methods. A combination of neo?institutional and post?Keynesian theoretical analysis was employed, along with classical statistics (time series analysis, correlation and regression analysis) and machine learning methods (a recurrent neural network architecture capable of capturing long?term dependencies in data sequences for forecasting and shift detection), as well as cluster analysis for objective periodization.
Results. A fundamental transformation of the monetary policy toolkit was noted. It was found that, under the influence of exogenous shocks, a paradigm shift occurred from an inflation targeting regime based on the key rate to a hybrid model characterized by the dominance of administrative and distributional instruments. Quantitative verification recorded a structural shift in the mechanisms of money supply formation. Key systemic contradictions of the hybrid model were identified, including the conflict between fiscal and monetary goals, financial market segmentation, and the undermining of the classical transmission mechanism. The outlines of an adaptive hybrid regulation paradigm were developed, based on the principles of institutional separation of functions, managed marketness, radical transparency, and technological modernization.
Conclusions. The novelty of the study lies in the synthesis of institutional analysis with the verification of structural shifts, as well as in the formulated principles of adaptive hybrid regulation for central banks operating under conditions of geopolitical turbulence.

Keywords: tools, credits, model, regulation, shift

References:

  1. Bernanke B.S. The New Tools of Monetary Policy. American Economic Review, 2020, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 943–983. DOI: 10.1257/aer.110.4.943 EDN: MIGUBM
  2. Rogoff K. Emerging Market Sovereign Debt in the Aftermath of the Pandemic. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2022, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 147–166. DOI: 10.1257/jep.36.4.147 EDN: OHHAMC
  3. Tooze A. Shutdown: How COVID Shook the World's Economy. Penguin, 2021, 368 p.
  4. North D.C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1990, 152 p.
  5. Lavoie M. Post-Keynesian Economics: New Foundations. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022, 744 p. DOI: 10.4000/interventionseconomiques.16208 EDN: OUCTFI
  6. Knight F.H. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Houghton Mifflin Company, 1921, 381 p.
  7. Friedman M., Schwartz A.J. A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1963, 860 p.
  8. Sargent T.J., Wallace N. Some Unpleasant Monetarist Arithmetic. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 1981, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1–17. DOI: 10.21034/qr.531
  9. Bernanke B.S., Mishkin F.S. Inflation Targeting: A New Framework for Monetary Policy? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1997, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 97–116. DOI: 10.1257/jep.11.2.97 EDN: CLXJOZ
  10. Svensson L.E.O. Inflation Forecast Targeting: Implementing and Monitoring Inflation Targets. European Economic Review, 1997, vol. 41, iss. 6, pp. 1111–1146. DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2921(96)00055-4 EDN: HHIPXJ
  11. Woodford M. Inflation targeting and financial stability. NBER Working Paper, 2012, no. 17967, 33 p. DOI: 10.3386/w17967
  12. Reinhart C.M., Sbrancia M.B. The Liquidation of Government Debt. Economic Policy, 2015, vol. 30, iss. 82, pp. 291–333. DOI: 10.1093/epolic/eiv003
  13. Sims C.A. Macroeconomics and Reality. Econometrica, 1980, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 1–48. DOI: 10.2307/1912017
  14. Kydland F.E., Prescott E.C. Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans. Journal of Political Economy, 1977, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 473–492. DOI: 10.1086/260580
  15. Barro R.J., Gordon D.B. Rules, Discretion and Reputation in a Model of Monetary Policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1983, vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 101–121. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3932(83)90051-X
  16. Stigler G.J. The Theory of Economic Regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 1971, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 3–21. DOI: 10.2307/3003160
  17. Holmstrom B., Milgrom P. Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 1991, vol. 7, iss. Special, pp. 24–52. DOI: 10.1093/jleo/7.special_issue.24
  18. Kiyotaki N., Moore J. Credit Cycles. Journal of Political Economy, 1997, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 211–248. DOI: 10.1086/262072 EDN: EMAKIN
  19. Calvo G.A., Reinhart C.M. Fear of Floating. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2002, vol. 117, iss. 2, pp. 379–408. DOI: 10.1162/003355302753650274 EDN: EEHULL
  20. Borio C. Implementing the macroprudential approach to financial regulation and supervision. Financial Stability Review, 2009, iss. 13, pp. 31–41.
  21. Rodrik D. Straight talk on trade: Ideas for a sane world economy. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2018, 336 p. DOI: 10.1515/9781400888900

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

ISSUE 9
SEPTEMBER 2026

Archive

Видите ошибку в отчестве? Отключите перевод, это английская версия сайта!