Subject. Communications used by central banks in the EAEU countries when implementing monetary policy, as well as measures to improve it. Objectives. The study seeks to reveal the prerequisites and development trends of communication channels and methods employed by central banks in the EAEU countries, identify regulatory measures aimed at improving communication practices, and assess the readability of statements on policy rates. Methods. The research applies general scientific methods of inquiry, including comparison and generalization, as well as analytical techniques and the coefficient method. The information base comprises regulatory legal acts, official publications of central banks in the EAEU countries, and academic publications by foreign and Russian authors. Results. The study reveals the prerequisites for changes and identifies the main trends in the development of communication policies of central banks in the EAEU countries over the period 1992–2025. Based on calculations using the Flesch–Kincaid, Coleman–Liau, and Evstigneeva–Sidorovsky readability indices, it is demonstrated that statements issued by central banks are highly complex, requiring post?university education for proper comprehension. The analysis further shows that EAEU countries that have adopted inflation targeting tend to have a broader range of communication channels and methods, as well as more comprehensible policy rate announcements. Conclusions. Since 2015, central banks across all EAEU countries have made considerable progress in enhancing the quality of their communication by segmenting information for different user groups. However, the readability of the information they provide remains rather low, with text complexity on the rise. Given the need to coordinate monetary policies within the alliance, it is essential to develop unified approaches to disclosing such information.
Keywords: communication, central bank, communication channels, inflation targeting, text readability
References:
Assenmacher K., Glöckler G., Holton S., Trautmann P., Ioannou D., Mee S. Clear, consistent and engaging: ECB monetary policy communication in a changing world. European Central Bank Occasional Paper, 2021, no. 274. URL: Link
Amato J.D., Morris S., Shin H.S. Communication and monetary policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2002, vol. 18, iss. 4, pp. 495–503. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/18.4.495 EDN: DWKCDR
Blinder A.S., Ehrmann M., Fratzscher M. et al. Central bank communication and monetary policy: A survey of theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 2008, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 910–945. DOI: 10.1257/jel.46.4.910
Feldkircher M., Hofmarcher P., Siklos P.L. What do central banks talk about? A European perspective on central bank communication. Focus on European Economic Integration, 2021, iss. Q2/21, pp. 61–81.
Haldane A., McMahon M. Central bank communications and the General Public. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 2018, vol. 108, pp. 578–583. DOI: 10.1257/pandp.20181082
Woodford M. Central-bank communication and policy effectiveness. Proceedings – Economic Policy Symposium – Jackson Hole, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 2005, pp. 399–474.
Svensson L.E.O. Inflation Targeting as a Monetary Policy Rule. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1999, vol. 43, iss. 3, pp. 607–654. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3932(99)00007-0
Gürkaynak R.S., Sack B., Swanson E.T. Do Actions Speak Louder than Words? The Response of Asset Prices to Monetary Policy Actions and Statements. International Journal of Central Banking, 2005, vol. 1, iss. 1, pp. 55–93.
Cecchetti S.G., Schoenholtz K. Improving U.S. Monetary Policy Communications. CEPR Discussion Paper, 2019, no. 13915, 61 p.
Blinder A.S., Morgan J. Are Two Heads Better Than One? Monetary Policy by Committee. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2005, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 789–811.
Blinder A. Making monetary policy by committee. International Finance, 2009, vol. 12, iss. 2, pp. 171–194. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2362.2008.01229.x
Sibert A. Monetary Policy Committees: Individual and Collective Reputations. Review of Economic Studies, 2003, vol. 70, iss. 3, pp. 649–665. DOI: 10.1111/1467-937X.00260 EDN: ETNKZL
Flesch R. A New Readability Yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1948, vol. 32, iss. 3, pp. 221–233. DOI: 10.1037/h0057532
Farr J.N., Jenkins J.J., Paterson D.G. Simplification of Flesch Reading Ease Formula. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1951, vol. 35, iss. 5, pp. 333–337. DOI: 10.1037/h0062427
Oborneva I.V. [Automation of text perception quality assessment]. Vestnik MGPU. Seriya: Informatika i informatizatsiya obrazovaniya, 2005, no. 5, pp. 86–91. (In Russ.) EDN: KUFKGN
Coleman M., Liau T.L. A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, vol. 60, iss. 2, pp. 283–284. DOI: 10.1037/h0076540
Evstigneeva A., Sidorovskiy M. [Assessment of clarity of Bank of Russia monetary policy communication by neural network approach]. Den'gi i kredit, 2021, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 3–33. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31477/rjmf.202103.03 EDN: GNAHBJ
Gunning R. The Technique of Clear Writing. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1952, 289 р.
Erokhin A., Klachkova O. [Influence of readability and tone of the Bank of Russia texts on inflation expectations]. Den'gi i kredit, 2024, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 27–47. (In Russ.) EDN: VITACH
Golodova Zh.G., Ranchinskaya Yu.S., Guliev O.F. Bankovskie sistemy stran EAES: tendentsii razvitiya i napravleniya sblizheniya [Banking systems of the EAEU countries: Development trends and convergence directions]. Moscow, MBA Publ., 2016, 442 p. EDN: WWJISP
