Subject. Features of the Russian institutional environment. Objectives. To identify and analyze the specifics of Russians’ socioeconomic practices under global changes (including in the context of a socioeconomic crisis). Methods. Methods of systems analysis and comparative analysis were applied. Data from Russian sociological studies conducted by the Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM), the Public Opinion Foundation (FOM), Russian companies (MTS Bank, YooMoney, Sberbank, VK), and mass media were used. Results. The specifics of Russian society and the Russian institutional environment were defined through the lens of systems theory. The main socioeconomic trends in Russian society were identified, including the features of Russians’ adaptive social and economic practices during the crisis. Scope of Application. The findings can be used in developing a Russian mobilization-based economic model; in forecasting Russians’ socioeconomic behavior under global changes (considering possible economic risks to the social system); and in designing educational courses in economic theory and economic sociology. Conclusions. A systems approach allows predicting the forms and types of socioeconomic behavior of economic actors under global changes, shaped by the geopolitical, climatic, geographical, and cultural specifics of Russian society. Analyzing the socioeconomic adaptability of economic actors enables a more detailed examination of the features of the institutional environment in Russian society.
Keywords: society, institutions, environment, system, community
References:
Flier A.Ya. [Society as a cultural system]. Kul’tura kul’tury, 2015, no. 3, p. 6. (In Russ.) EDN: TYNITV
Goryachkina Yu.V. [The genesis of ideas about the “institutional environment”]. Modeli, sistemy, seti v ekonomike, tekhnike, prirode i obshchestve, 2012, no. 2, pp. 23–27. (In Russ.) EDN: RPUEZN
Bazhenov S.I. [Institutional system as a factor of providing regional economic security]. Vestnik Akademii MVD Respubliki Belarus’, 2022, no. 1, pp. 48–54. (In Russ.) EDN: ZHQRTD
Parsons T. Sistema sovremennykh obshchestv [The system of modern societies]. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ., 1998, 270 p. (In Russ.)
Luhmann N. Obshchestvo kak sotsial’naya sistema [Society as a social system]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2004, vol. 1, 232 p. (In Russ.) EDN: PWOOCR
Shkaratan O.I. [Society as a social system]. Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal, 2011, no. 4, pp. 116–143. (In Russ.) EDN: PWIOJB
Vandam (Edrikhin) A.E. Geopolitika i geostrategiya [Geopolitics and geostrategy]. Moscow, Kuchkovo pole Publ., 2002, 272 p. (In Russ.)
Kappes A.A. [Adaptability as a strategic opportunity during a crisis]. Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya nauki i tekhnologiy, 2016, no. 2-6, pp. 71–75. (In Russ.) EDN: VOZWKR
Prigogine I., Stengers I. Poryadok iz khaosa: Novyi dialog cheloveka s prirodoi [Order out of chaos. Man’s new dialogue with nature]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1986, 432 p. (In Russ.)
Kara-Murza S.G. Manipulyatsiya soznaniem: monografiya [Mind manipulation: a monograph]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2005, 832 p. (In Russ.) EDN: UCTHYC
Dimitrova S.V., Kal’dinova G.P., Kyarova M.A. [On new types of solidarity under the conditions of global risks]. Vestnik Kalmytskogo universiteta, 2022, no. 3, pp. 116–123. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.53315/1995‑0713‑2022‑55‑3‑116‑123 EDN: YSOANH
Esin R.G., Esin O.R., Khakimova A.R. [Stress‑induced disorders]. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova, 2020, vol. 120, no. 5, pp. 131–137. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17116/jnevro2020120051131 EDN: HWEYZZ
Prokhorenko I.O., Germanova V.N., Sergeev O.S. [Stress and state of the immune system in norm and pathology. Brief review of literature]. Vestnik meditsinskogo instituta REAVIZ: reabilitatsiya, vrach i zdorov’e, 2017, no. 1, pp. 82–90. (In Russ.) EDN: YLFZHH
Lukmanova R.Kh., Frolova I.V. [Foundations of social solidarity for modern Russia]. Rossiyskiy gumanitarnyy zhurnal, 2023, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 221–228. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.15643/libartrus-2023.4.4 EDN: WUSMOJ
Stoletov A.I., Lukmanova R.Kh. [The problem of solidarity formation in the solidarity economy]. Ekonomika i upravlenie: nauchno-prakticheskii zhurnal, 2024, no. 5, pp. 4–11. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.34772/EU.2024.5.1 EDN: GVJHMC
Chervyakov A.A. [Culture of solidarity as a phenomenon of global culture]. Vestnik Stavropol’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2007, no. 50, pp. 269–276. (In Russ.) EDN: MTGPZR
Chernyshov V.A. [Charity as a type of «soft power» technologies]. Gileya: nauchnyi vestnik, 2016, no. 109, pp. 180–182. (In Russ.) EDN: XCLMVZ
Klyuchevskii V.O. Dobrye lyudi drevnei Rusi [Good people of ancient Rus’]. Sergiev Posad, self-published, 1892, 20 p. (In Russ.)
Pokotilova T.E. [Daily routine of charity as the most important aspect of the history of Russian charity]. Vestnik Severo-Kavkazskogo federal’nogo universiteta, 2014, no. 3, pp. 168–171. (In Russ.) EDN: SHKGUN
Kovalev V.V. [Civil culture as basic construct of civil society]. Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal’noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski SKAGS, 2014, no. 1, pp. 179–184. (In Russ.) EDN: RZDADB
Usvatov I.S. [To the question of structure of civil society: Definition of institution of civil society]. Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel’stve, 2009, no. 4, pp. 82–84. (In Russ.) EDN: OCBNZJ
