Subject. This article considers the issue of company valuation in the context of going public focusing on the comparative approach and market multipliers importance. Objectives. The article aims to determine the significance of an IPO as a tool for increasing company value, and to identify key methodological and practical challenges arising from the application of the comparative approach to valuation in the Russian market context. Methods. For the study, I used systems, comparative, and empirical analyses, and statistical methods for data processing. Results. The article clarifies the comparability criteria, proposes applying panel data in cases of limited peers, using average stock prices over a defined period after the financial reporting date, adjusting the valuation approach to account for expected changes in the business model prior to the IPO, summarizing multiplier selection guidelines based on industry and capital structure, and eliminating one-off income and expenses. Conclusions and Relevance. To improve the reliability of the comparative approach, methodological refinement of criteria for selecting comparables and valuation multiples is required. The proposed measures aim to reduce subjectivity, improve transparency and the quality of valuations in the context of IPOs. The research findings are applicable to IPO preparation, valuation and investment analysis practices, as well as the activities of regulators and self-regulatory organizations.
Keywords: IPO, business valuation, market multiplier, comparative approach, company value
References:
Cox J.S. Pre-IPO cash flow volatility and aftermarket valuation. Managerial Finance, 2020, vol. 46, iss. 1, pp. 159–176. DOI: 10.1108/MF-06-2019-0288
Rasheed A., Sohali M.K., Din S.-U., Ijaz M. How Do Investment Banks Price Initial Public Offerings? An Empirical Analysis of Emerging Market. International Journal of Financial Studies, 2018, vol. 6, iss. 3. DOI: 10.3390/ijfs6030077
Ong C.Z., Mohd-Rashid R., Taufil-Mohd K.N. IPO valuation using the price-multiple methods: evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 2021, vol. 19, iss. 4, pp. 540–570. DOI: 10.1108/JFRA-05-2020-0128 EDN: UFPQDI
Cooper I., Lambertides N. Optimal equity valuation using multiples: The number of comparable firms. European Financial Management, 2023, vol. 29, iss. 4, pp. 1025–1053. DOI: 10.1111/eufm.12405 EDN: AMDFIC
Deloof M., De Maeseneire W., Inghelbrecht K. How Do Investment Banks Value Initial Public Offerings (IPOs)? Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2009, vol. 36, no. 1-2, pp. 130–160. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2008.02117.x
Koklev P.S. [Valuation multiples: the gap between theory and practice of business valuation]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo, 2022, no. 7, pp. 1065–1068. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.34925/EIP.2022.144.7.211 EDN: TAWAXU
Brealey R.A., Myers S.C., Allen F. Principles of Corporate Finance. New York, McGraw-Hill Education, 2020, 992 p.
Damodaran A. Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset. Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, 2012, 992 p.
Koller T., Goedhart M., Wessels D. Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies. Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, 2020, 896 p.
Rosenbaum J., Pearl J. Investment Banking: Valuation, Leveraged Buyouts, and Mergers & Acquisitions. Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, 2013, 464 p.
Barinov N.P., Zakhmatov D.Yu. [On Valuation Based on a Single Comparable and the Required Number of Comparables in the Method of Quantitative Adjustments]. Voprosy otsenki, 2022, no. 3-4, pp. 7–13. (In Russ.) EDN: QXNSJW
Meitner M. The Market Approach to Comparable Company Valuation. Springer Science & Business Media, 2006, 241 p.
Godek P., McCann C., Simundza D., Taveras C. Rethinking the Comparable Companies Valuation Method. Securities Litigation and Consulting Group, 2011. URL: Link
Nel W.S., Bruwer B.W., Le Roux N.J. The impact of industry classification on the valuation accuracy of multiples in the South African capital market. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 2013, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 79–102. DOI: 10.19030/iber.v12i1.7514
Hrazdil K., Zhang R. The importance of industry classification in estimating concentration ratios. Economics Letters, 2012, vol. 114, iss. 2, pp. 224–227. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.10.001
Goulart Serra R., Lopes Fávero L.P. Multiples' Valuation: The Selection of Cross-Border Comparable Firms. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2018, vol. 54, iss. 9, pp. 1973–1992. DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2017.1336084
Richardson A.W., Veenstra K. The Post-earnings Announcement Drift: A Pre-earnings Announcement Effect? A Multi-period Analysis. Abacus, 2022, vol. 58, iss. 4, pp. 648–678. DOI: 10.1111/abac.12265 EDN: YUYTKQ
Fink J. A review of the post-earnings-announcement drift. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 2021, vol. 29, 100446. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100446
Chen Q., Gao X., Mo J., Xu Z. Market Reaction to Local Attention around Earnings Announcements in China: Evidence from Internet Search Activity. International Journal of Financial Studies, 2022, vol. 10, iss. 4. DOI: 10.3390/ijfs10040097 EDN: PVOGLN
Danilova O.V., Troshin D. [Modern approach for comparable companies and multiples selection for share fair price valuation]. Ekonomika i upravlenie: teoriya i praktika, 2021, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 46–51. (In Russ.) EDN: KEGDYO
Bradrania R., Elliott W., Wu E. Institutional ownership and liquidity commonality: Evidence from Australia. Accounting & Finance, 2022, vol. 62, no. S1, pp. 1231–1272. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2211.03287 EDN: DVZRKN
Nguyen H.P.N., Tran T.M.T. Impact of liquidity on capital structure and financial performance in IPO firms. Future Business Journal, 2024, vol. 10. DOI: 10.1186/s43093-024-00412-7 EDN: FSJWNQ
Mohammad S.J., Kotha K.K. Stock Liquidity and Firm Value: Evidence from a Policy Experiment in India. International Review of Finance, 2020, vol. 20, iss. 1, pp. 215–224. DOI: 10.1111/irfi.12200
Fu X., Lian Q., Tang T. et al. Relationship Institutions: Evidence from IPOs. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 2025, vol. 40, iss. 3, pp. 737–764. DOI: 10.1177/0148558X231185628 EDN: GHJSDF
Dumrongwong K. Do institutional investors stabilize stock returns? Evidence from emerging IPO markets. Pacific Accounting Review, 2020, vol. 32, iss. 4, pp. 585–600. DOI: 10.1108/PAR-11-2019-0145 EDN: WUEOJR
Onore A.S., Fed'ko T.S., Sosnilo A.I. [Assessment of the dynamics of changes in the capitalization of russian companies after the IPO]. Nauchnyi zhurnal NIU ITMO. Seriya: Ekonomika i ekologicheskii menedzhment, 2023, no. 4, pp. 128–140. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17586/2310-1172-2023-16-4-128-140 EDN: IDBFKY
Cole R.A., Floros I.V., Ivanov V.I. U.S. exchange upgrades: Reducing uncertainty through a two-stage IPO. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 2019, vol. 38, pp. 45–57. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfi.2018.07.003
Huang Y.S., Li M., Chen C.R. Financial market development, market transparency, and IPO performance. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 2019, vol. 55, pp. 63–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.03.007
Armstrong C.S., Core J.E., Taylor D.J., Verrecchia R.E. When Does Information Asymmetry Affect the Cost of Capital? Journal of Accounting Research, 2011, vol. 49, iss. 1, pp. 1–40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2010.00391.x
Tavares D., Febra L., Costa M. The Impact of an IPO Launch on Corporate Brand Value. European Journal of Applied Business Management, 2023, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 134–149. DOI: 10.58869/EJABM9(4)/08 EDN: AXWHPY
Zhang R. IPO as a Key Process for a Successful Company. BCP Business & Management, 2023, vol. 46, pp. 178–183. DOI: 10.54691/bcpbm.v46i.5094 EDN: XCOINB
Fan P. Debt Retirement at IPO and Firm Growth. Journal of Economics and Business, 2019, vol. 101, pp. 1–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2018.08.004
BrogiM., LagasioV., PesicV. Can governance help in making an IPO "successful"? New evidence from Europe. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 2020, vol. 31, iss. 3, pp. 239–269. DOI: 10.1111/jifm.12116 EDN: UWBEJE
Pinto J.E., Henry E., Robinson T.R., Stowe J.D., Miller P.F. Equity Asset Valuation. Hoboken, Wiley, 2010, 441 p.
