Subject. The article considers the influence of CEO education on investment attractiveness of companies. Objectives. We focus on assessing the impact of CEO's level of education on company’s investment appeal. Methods. The empirical evidence contains observations on the 103 largest companies by capitalization from three macro regions: Russia, the USA, and Europe, for 2021. To test the stated hypotheses, we employ linear regression and neural network. The latter enables to build more complex (and hidden) dependencies due to multi-stage transformation of variables, and get a better predictive ability of the theoretical model on a test set than a classical linear regression. The outliers in the sample are replaced with typical values, using the k nearest neighbors method. To select the most significant independent variables in the dataset, we use a random forest algorithm that shows which variables should be included in the model. Results. The study confirmed that if Russian CEOs have an MBA degree, technical education and a degree from a prestigious American university, or technical education from European universities, this makes companies more attractive to investors. The findings serve not only as a theoretical basis for development of the agency theory of corporate finance and corporate governance, but also can be applied in practice by company shareholders to select CEOs. Conclusions. The analysis, involving the economic and mathematical methods and machine learning, demonstrated the dependence of the characteristics of CEO education on investment attractiveness of the world's largest corporations. Accordingly, shareholders need to pay special attention to the education of CEO candidates.
Blount I., Triana M. del C., Richard O., Li M. How women CEOs’ financial knowledge and firm homophily affect venture performance. Journal of Business Research, 2023, vol. 155, Part A, 113459. URL: Link
Kim E.-S. Deep learning and principal-agent problems of algorithmic governance: The new materialism perspective. Technology in Society, 2020, vol. 63, 101378. URL: Link
Hmieleski K.M., Corbett A.C., Baron R.A. Entrepreneurs’ improvisational behavior and firm performance: A study of dispositional and environmental moderators. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2013, vol. 7, iss. 2, pp. 138–150. URL: Link
Amernic J.H., Craig R.J. Accounting as a facilitator of extreme narcissism. Journal of Business Ethics, 2010, vol. 96, pp. 79–93. URL: Link
Shleifer A., Vishny R.W. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 1997, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 737–783. URL: Link
Akerlof G.A. The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1970, vol. 84, iss. 3, pp. 488–500. URL: Link
McCarthy D., Puffer S. Corporate Governance in Russia: Towards a European, US, or Russian Model? European Management Journal, 2002, vol. 20, iss. 6, pp. 630–640. URL: Link00114-7
Serfling M.A. CEO age and the riskiness of corporate policies. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2014, vol. 25, pp. 251–273. URL: Link
Herrmann P., Datta D.K. CEO experiences: Effects on the choice of FDI entry mode. Journal of Management Studies, 2006, vol. 43, iss. 4, pp. 755–778. URL: Link
Hitt M.A., Tyler B.B. Strategic decision models: Integrating different perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 1991, vol. 12, iss. 5, pp. 327–351. URL: Link
Malmendier U., Tate G. CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. The Journal of Finance, 2005, vol. 60, iss. 6, pp. 2661–2700. URL: Link
Custódio C., Metzger D. Financial Expert CEOs: CEO’s work experience and firm’s financial policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 2014, vol. 114, iss. 1, pp. 125–154. URL: Link
Chevalier J., Ellison G. Career concerns of mutual fund managers. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 389–432.
