Subject. This article analyzes the totality of economic relations and problems within the framework of the spatial development of settlements and subjects of the Russian Federation. Objectives. The article aims to develop a multi-criteria approach to the assessment and selection of transport infrastructure development projects, taking into account the interests of a wide range of subjects, quantitative and qualitative criteria based on the fuzzy logic approach. Methods. For the study, we used the methods of economic analysis, synthesis, comparison, and n-dimensional Euclidean distance. Results. The article reveals internal and external, direct and indirect effects and offers a classification of criteria for assessing infrastructure projects, taking into account the socio-economic and environmental context. The article also presents a methodology for multi-criteria assessment and selection of transport infrastructure development projects, including the calculation of an integral indicator, the consideration of quantitative and qualitative criteria based on the apparatus of fuzzy sets, which allows ranking them and determining the most priority project for implementation. Relevance. The proposed methodological approach to the evaluation of infrastructure projects can be used by executive authorities as a tool to support management decision-making in the framework of a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of national and regional transport projects.
Keywords: transport, infrastructure, fuzzy sets, time, transport costs
References:
Button K. Is There Any Economic Justification for High-Speed Railways in the United States? Journal of Transport Geography, 2012, vol. 22, pp. 300–302. URL: Link
Hall P., Banister D. The Second Railway Age. Built Environment, 1993, vol. 19, no. 3-4, pp. 157–162.
Teng J.-Y., Tzeng G.-H. A Multiobjective Programming Approach for Selecting Non-Independent Transportation Investment Alternatives. Transportation Research. Part B: Methodological, 1996, vol. 30, iss. 4, pp. 291–307. URL: Link00032-1
Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 1965, vol. 8, iss. 3, pp. 338–353. URL: Link90241-X
Tah J.H.M., Carr V. A Proposal for Construction Project Risk Assessment Using Fuzzy Logic. Construction Management and Economics, 2000, vol. 18, iss. 4, pp. 491–500. URL: Link
Gupanova Yu.E. [The use of fuzzy logic tools to evaluate the quality of customs services]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 2016, vol. 15, iss. 1, pp. 143–158. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Semenenko M.G., Lesina T.V. [Evaluation of the effectiveness of investment projects on the basis of fuzzy logic formalism]. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya = Financial Analytics: Science and Experience, 2011, vol. 4, iss. 29, pp. 63–68. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Rostovskii N.S., Smirnov D.S. [A simulation fuzzy model for building an optimal portfolio of linked pair of contracts for natural uranium and uranium enrichment services by the NPP operator]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 2016, vol. 15, iss. 10, pp. 140–154. URL: Link (In Russ.)
Savrukov A.N., Savrukov N.T., Kozlovskaya E.A. [Risk assessment of public-private partnership in Russia based on the fuzzy logic method]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2020, no. 10, pp. 132–143. (In Russ.) URL: Link
Choi J., Chung J., Lee D.-J. Risk Perception Analysis: Participation in China's Water PPP Market. International Journal of Project Management, 2010, vol. 28, iss. 6, pp. 580–592. URL: Link
Cheung E., Chan A.P.C. Risk Factors of Public-Private Partnership Projects in China: Comparison between the Water, Power, and Transportation Sectors. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2011, vol. 137, iss. 4, pp. 409–415. URL: LinkUP.1943-5444.0000086
Wibowo A., Mohamed S. Risk Criticality and Allocation in Privatised Water Supply Projects in Indonesia. International Journal of Project Management, 2010, vol. 28, iss. 5, pp. 504–513. URL: Link
Spector P.E. Using Self-Report Questionnaires in OB Research: A Comment on the Use of a Controversial Method. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1994, vol. 15, iss. 5, pp. 385–392. URL: Link
Likert R. A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 1932, vol. 22, no. 140. pp. 5–55. URL: Link
Hwang C.-L., Yoon K. Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making. In: Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1981, vol. 186, pp. 58–191. URL: Link
