+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Finance and Credit
 

The role and significance of endogenous factors of the IFRS Foundation in relation to the quality of International Financial Reporting Standards

Vol. 28, Iss. 1, JANUARY 2022

Received: 25 October 2021

Received in revised form: 18 November 2021

Accepted: 2 December 2021

Available online: 31 January 2022

Subject Heading: CHALLENGES OF GLOBALIZATION

JEL Classification: F53, G39, M49, М16, О15

Pages: 179–212

https://doi.org/10.24891/fc.28.1.179

Mikhail V. RODCHENKOV Lomonosov Moscow State University (Lomonosov MSU), Moscow, Russian Federation
M.Rodchenkov@gmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6938-2313

Subject. The article addresses relationship between qualitative characteristics of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and internal socio-economic factors of the IFRS Foundation.
Objectives. The study aims to assess relationship between internal socio-economic factors of the IFRS Foundation and the quality of standards under development; to formulate practical proposals for improving the IFRS, taking into account the emergence of new industries, global products and services, requiring high-quality methodological support.
Methods. The study employs methods of grouping, the comparative, structural, and logical analysis, synthesis, modeling, and expert assessment.
Results. The relationship between the quality of standards under development and individual internal socio-economic factors of the IFRS Foundation is characterized by close correlation, expressed through the effect of predictive influence of such factors on the quality of standards. The highlighted properties and the nature of this relationship determine the role and significance of internal factors and underlie the possibility and expediency of quality management in standards development through controlled changes in the parameters of corresponding internal factors.
Conclusions. The correction of the IFRS Council composition, which increases the degree of compliance of the synthesized professional potential of this management body with the assigned management functionality, can contribute to improving the quality of standards under development. The findings may be useful for representatives of authorized State bodies in this field and in the area of international relations, taking into account the global expansion of IFRS and rapid formation of new industries.

Keywords: endogenous factor, quality, standard, globalization, IFRS Foundation

References:

  1. Garrett J., Hoitash R., Prawitt D. Trust and Financial Reporting Quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 2014, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1087–1125. URL: Link
  2. Carlsson-Wall M., Kaarbøe K., Kraus K., Meidell A. Risk Management as Passionate Imitation: The Interconnections Among Emotions, Performance Metrics, and Risk in a Global Technology Firm. Abacus, 2021, vol. 57, iss. 1, pp. 72–100. URL: Link
  3. Nehme R., Mutawa A., Jizi M. Dysfunctional behavior of external auditors the collision of time budget and time deadline evidence from a developing country. The Journal of Developing Areas, 2016, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 373–388. URL: Link
  4. Schantl S.F., Wagenhofer A. Optimal internal control regulation: Standards, penalties, and leniency in enforcement. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2021, vol. 40, iss. 3. URL: Link
  5. Donatella P. Further evidence on the relationship between audit industry specialisation and public sector audit quality. Financial Accountability and Management, 2021. URL: Link
  6. Farooque O. Sustainable financial reporting practice in Australian companies – Does quality matter? The Journal of Developing Areas, 2016, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 175–189. URL: Link
  7. Stocken P.C., Verrecchia R.E. Financial Reporting System Choice and Disclosure Management. The Accounting Review, 2004, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 1181–1203. URL: Link
  8. Kadous K., Mercer M. Can Reporting Norms Create a Safe Harbor? Jury Verdicts against Auditors under Precise and Imprecise Accounting Standards. The Accounting Review, 2012, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 565–587. URL: Link
  9. Agoglia C.P., Doupnik T.S., Tsakumis G.T. Principles-Based versus Rules-Based Accounting Standards: The Influence of Standard Precision and Audit Committee Strength on Financial Reporting Decisions. The Accounting Review, 2011, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 747–767. URL: Link
  10. Lee M. Introduction: Bubbles and Machines. In: Bubbles and Machines: Gender, Information and Financial Crises. London, University of Westminster Press, 2019, pp. 1–28.
  11. Lee M. The Screen, Financial Information and Market Locale. In: Bubbles and Machines: Gender, Information and Financial Crises. London, University of Westminster Press, 2019, pp. 107–130.
  12. Richardson A.J. Merging the Profession: A Social Network Analysis of the Consolidation of the Accounting Profession in Canada. Accounting Perspectives, 2017, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 83–104. URL: Link
  13. Baker C.R., Barbu E.M., Le T.N. A historiographical review of research concerning accounting changes in post-communist economies. The Accounting Historians Journal, 2015, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1–36. URL: Link
  14. McDaniel L., Martin R.D., Maines L.A. Evaluating Financial Reporting Quality: The Effects of Financial Expertise vs. Financial Literacy. The Accounting Review, 2002, vol. 77, pp. 139–167. URL: Link
  15. Dezoort F.T. An analysis of experience effects on audit committee members' oversight judgments. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1998, vol. 23, iss. 1, pp. 1–21. URL: Link00029-9
  16. Gassen J., Schwedler K. The Decision Usefulness of Financial Accounting Measurement Concepts: Evidence from an Online Survey of Professional Investors and their Advisors. European Accounting Review, 2010, vol. 19, iss. 3, pp. 495–509. URL: Link
  17. Riles A. Culture Clash: Experts and the Public. In: Financial Citizenship: Experts, Publics, and the Politics of Central Banking. Ithaca, London, Cornell University Press, 2018, pp. 35–42.
  18. Lev B. The deteriorating usefulness of financial report information and how to reverse it. Accounting and Business Research, 2018, vol. 48, iss. 5, pp. 465–493. URL: Link
  19. Nichols T. The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters. Oxford University Press, 2017, 272 p.
  20. Gilbert D. Stumbling on Happiness. Vintage Canada Edition, 2007, 336 p.
  21. Kenrick D.T., Griskevicius V., Neuberg S.L., Schaller M. Renovating the Pyramid of Needs: Contemporary Extensions Built upon Ancient Foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2010, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 292–314. URL: Link
  22. Nurnberg H. Changing perceptions of U.S. standard setters concerning the basic objectives of corporate financial reporting. The Accounting Historians Journal, 2015, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 61–84. URL: Link

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 30, Iss. 3
March 2024

Archive