+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»






Finance and Credit

New finance: Psychological measurement of value

Vol. 27, Iss. 5, MAY 2021

Received: 15 March 2021

Received in revised form: 29 March 2021

Accepted: 12 April 2021

Available online: 28 May 2021

Subject Heading: THEORY OF FINANCE

JEL Classification: G32

Pages: 1156–1177


Semen Yu. BOGATYREV Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation


Subject. The article addresses emotional factors that affect value under psychological concepts. It describes processes of obtaining information for surveys when measuring emotions, adjusting the evaluation tools, taking into account new analytical capabilities provided by the use of psychological measurement.
Objectives. The study aims at creating a methodology to consider the impact of emotional factors that become apparent under the influence of psychological concepts, on value.
Methods. I employ methods of induction and deduction in survey data processing.
Results. The paper discloses the content of the main methods for recording emotions in the process of making a conclusion about the value by financial decision makers under the influence of psychological concepts. It demonstrates tools for implementing the methods of psychological measurement in valuation. The findings may be helpful in the work of modern appraisers and value analysts. It is especially important to use the tools for measuring emotions in conditions of digital economy, instability and crisis, a change in the market paradigm, distortion of traditional financial and economic indicators, market volatility. The use of psychological concepts complements and expands the classic assessment toolkit, improves the quality of valuation.
Conclusions. The paper concludes on opportunities that financial analysts have, when applying new advances in behavioral finance and modern psychological studies. It outlines prospects for analytical tools development, using new indicators to enhance the efficiency of valuation results.

Keywords: behavioral finance, prospect theory, framing, valuation, behavioral valuation


  1. Statman M. Behavioral Finance: The Second Generation. CFA Institute Research Foundation, 2019, 209 p.
  2. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 297–323. URL: Link
  3. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 1974, vol. 185, no. 4157, pp. 1124–1131. URL: Link
  4. Varian H.R. Big Data: New Tricks for Econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2014, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 3–28. URL: Link
  5. Hausman J. Contingent Valuation: From Dubious to Hopeless. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2012, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 43–56. URL: Link
  6. Brennan M.J., Chordia T., Subrahmanyam A. Alternative Factor Specifications, Security Characteristics and the Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 1998, vol. 49, iss. 3, pp. 345–373. URL: Link00028-2
  7. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 1979, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 263–292. URL: Link
  8. Blume L., Easley D. Evolution and Market Behavior. Journal of Economic Theory, 1992, vol. 58, iss. 1, pp. 9–40. URL: Link90099-4
  9. Brock W., Lakonishok J., LeBaron B. Simple Technical Trading Rules and the Stochastic Properties of Stock Returns. The Journal of Finance, 1992, vol. 47, iss. 5, pp. 1731–1764. URL: Link
  10. De Bondt W.F.M., Thaler R. Does the Stock Market Overreact? The Journal of Finance, 1985, vol. 40, iss. 3, pp. 793–805. URL: Link
  11. Baker K.H., Nofsinger J.R. Behavioral Finance: Investors, Corporations, and Markets. New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2010, 768 p. URL: Link
  12. Barber B.M., Odean T. All That Glitters: The Effect of Attention and News on the Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors. The Review of Financial Studies, 2008, vol. 21, iss. 2, pp. 785–818. URL: Link
  13. Barber B.M., Odean T. Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001, vol. 116, iss. 1, pp. 261–292. URL: Link
  14. Barberis N., Shleifer A. Style Investing. Journal of Financial Economics, 2003, vol. 68, pp. 161–199. URL: Link00064-3
  15. Barberis N.C. Thirty Years of Prospect Theory in Economics: A Review and Assessment. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2013, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 173–196. URL: Link
  16. Basu S. The Relationship between Earnings' Yield, Market Value, and Return for NYSE Common Stocks: Further Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 1983, vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 129–156. URL: Link90031-4
  17. Bates D. The Crash of '87: Was it Expected? The Evidence from Options Markets. The Journal of Finance, 1991, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 1009–1044. URL: Link
  18. Benartzi Sh., Thaler R.H. Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 73–92. URL: Link
  19. Bernard V.L., Thomas J.K. Post-earnings-announcement Drift: Delayed Price Response or Risk Premium? Journal of Accounting Research, 1989, vol. 27, pp. 1–36. URL: Link

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 28, Iss. 6
June 2022