+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Finance and Credit
 

Research on tax administration reforms in the Russian practice

Vol. 26, Iss. 4, APRIL 2020

Received: 11 February 2020

Received in revised form: 25 February 2020

Accepted: 10 March 2020

Available online: 28 April 2020

Subject Heading: FISCAL SYSTEM

JEL Classification: E62, H21, H25, H61, H71

Pages: 898–915

https://doi.org/10.24891/fc.26.4.898

Evnevich M.A. Saint-Petersburg State University (SPbSU), St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
m.evnevich@spbu.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5137-8060

Ivanova D.V. Saint-Petersburg State University (SPbSU), St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
d.v.ivabova@spbu.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7250-9186

Subject. The article deals with the scope of application of digital technologies to tax monitoring and administration. Digitalization plays an important part in activities performed by the Federal Tax Service and helps reduce the administrative workload on both taxpayers and tax authority. The use of digital communication channels saves our time, because it allows to submit tax returns and send letters online. Besides, it enhances the efficiency of in-office audits and helps identify eventual tax violations.
Objectives. We review a set of digital services and technologies used by the Federal Tax Service, their effectiveness, and present our findings on taxpayers’ attitude to ongoing digital reforms.
Methods. The validity and argumentation are based on official statistics of the Federal Tax Service concerning the dynamics of tax revenues and inspections, quantitative research through questionnaires and analysis of the findings.
Results. We examine a range of digital services and technologies, including the Automated Control System – Value Added Tax, a new type of cash registers – Automated Information System Marking, Federal Government Information System – Unified State Register Civil Registry Office, and personal accounts of taxpayers. Moreover, the articles presents the results of a survey among owners and top managers of companies, identifying their opinion on the coming taxation reforms.
Conclusions and Relevance. Digitalization helped the Federal Tax Service to significantly increase the efficiency of tax audits, while reducing the frequency of tax audits and the number of fly-by-night companies and the likelihood of using informal tax administration schemes. However, authorities should find a balance between the enhancement of the taxation system and their relationship with businesses.

Keywords: taxation, tax administration, tax monitoring

References:

  1. Petukhova N.V. [Tax administration in terms of modernization of tax authorities activity]. Nalogi i finansy = Taxes and Finance, 2016, no. 3, pp. 34–38. (In Russ.)
  2. Anisimov A.L. [The efficiency of tax administration in the tax system of the Russian Federation]. Izvestiya Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta = Journal of the Ural State University of Economics, 2015, no. 1, pp. 24–30. (In Russ.)
  3. Solov'ev A.I. [Risk-based approach in the system of government control and supervision in the tax sphere]. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, Taxes & Law, 2017, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 139–146. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  4. Novoselov K.V. [Risk management prospects in the tax sphere]. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, Taxes & Law, 2017, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 29–38. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  5. Smirnova E.E. [Tax control in the digital economy]. Finansy = Finance, 2017, no. 11, pp. 32–34. (In Russ.)
  6. Kirova E.A., Morozova N.G., Bezverkhii A.S. [Transformation of the Russian tax system in the context of establishment of the digital economy]. Vestnik universiteta, 2019, no. 7, pp. 118–124. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  7. Novoselov K.V. [Developing the theory and practice of tax control over the tax base of corporate income]. Innovatsionnoe razvitie ekonomiki = Innovative Development of Economy, 2016, no. 3-2, pp. 188–193. (In Russ.)
  8. Grunina D.K. [Information digital technology and activity of the tax authorities]. Nalogi i finansy = Taxes and Finance, 2018, no. 1, pp. 24–34. (In Russ.)
  9. Roshchupkina V.V. [Problems and prospects of interaction between entrepreneurs and tax authorities of the Russian Federation in the context of digitalization of the tax administration mechanism]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo = Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship, 2019, no. 5, pp. 222–225. (In Russ.)
  10. Gul'kova E.L., Karp M.V., Tipalina M.V. [Tax challenges of the digital economy]. Vestnik universiteta, 2019, no. 4, pp. 89–95. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  11. Voronov A.A. [Monitoring as an efficient form of tax control]. Finansy: teoriya i praktika = Finance: Theory and Practice, 2016, no. 2, pp. 145–149. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  12. Krashennikova M.A. [Tax Monitoring is the Digital Future of Tax Control]. Nalogovaya politika i praktika = Tax Policy and Practice Issue, 2018, no. 3, pp. 40–43. (In Russ.)
  13. Kirillova O.S. [Contemporary technologies of tax administration: Addressing the threats or using the opportunities to ensure the economic security]. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost' i kachestvo = Economic Security and Quality, 2018, no. 1, pp. 69–75. (In Russ.)
  14. Advokatova A.S. [The interrelation of the tax payer behavior and tax control models]. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, Taxes & Law, 2017, no. 5, pp. 148–157. (In Russ.)

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 30, Iss. 3
March 2024

Archive