Subject. The article investigates the structural parameters of the financial system, which enable to assess the quality of its structure. Objectives. We make attempts to test the hypothesis about the availability of relationship between the structure of the Russian financial system and the results of socio-economic development. Methods. To analyze the structure of the financial system of Russia, we employ the OECD international methodology and the data of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. Results. The paper presents our own interpretation of macroeconomic identical relation reflecting the factor sources of economic growth; discloses the significance of capital as a financial parameter, which is subject to transformation under the influence of advanced digital technologies; includes the coefficients, which we developed for a qualitative analysis of the financial system structure, taking into account the specifics of the Russian national economy. One of the said coefficients (the actual indicator of financial potential) is intended to reflect the level of financial digitalization. Conclusions. Given the current controversial opinions on the impact of the financial system’s structure on economic growth, we believe that during the further study of the issue, it is important to rely not only on international methods, but also on domestic scientific developments, like the presented coefficients 5–9.
Chakraborty S., Ray T. The Development and Structure of Financial Systems. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2007, vol. 31, iss. 9, pp. 2920–2956. URL: Link
Deltuvaitė V., Sinevičienė L. Research on the Relationship between the Structure of Financial System and Economic Development. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, vol. 156, pp. 533–537. URL: Link
Ergungor O.E. Financial System Structure and Economic Growth: Structure Matters. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2017, vol. 17, iss. 2, pp. 292–305. URL: Link
Fîrcescua B. Crises Effects on Financial System Structure in Some post-Communist Countries. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, vol. 58, pp. 444–453. URL: Link
Simion D., Stanciu M., Armăşelu S. Correlation Analysis Between Structure Financial System and Economic Growth in Romania. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2015, vol. 32, pp. 1332–1341. URL: Link01510-5
Lebedev A.V., Rasumovskaya E.A. Financial Regulation in the Initial Phase of Market Reforms in Russia and Its Impact on Subsequent Economic Development. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Education Science and Social Development (ESSD). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. Atlantis Press, 2019, vol. 298, pр. 559–564. URL: Link
Schumpeter J.A. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Harvard Economic Studies, 1934, 255 p.
King R.G., Levine R. Finance and Growth: Schumpeter Might Be Right. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1993, vol. 108, iss. 3, pp. 717–737.
Langfield S., Pagano M. Bank Bias in Europe: Effects on Systemic Risk and Growth. European Central Bank Working Paper, 2015, no. 1797, 61 p. URL: Link
Arcand J.-L., Berkes E., Panizza U. Too Much Finance? Journal of Economic Growth, 2015, vol. 20, iss. 2, pp. 105–148. URL: Link
Danilov Yu.A., Pivovarov D.A. [Financial structure in Russia: Conclusions for State policy]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2018, no. 3, pp. 30–47. (In Russ.) URL: Link
Demirgüç-Kunt A., Levine R. Financial Structure and Economic Growth: Perspectives and Lessons. URL: Link
Razumovskaya E.A., Lebedev A.V. [Financial regulation of reproduction and investment processes in the national economy of Russia in the initial period of market reforms]. Ekonomika imenedzhment sistem upravleniya = Economics and Management of Management Systems, 2019, no. 3, pp. 68–76. (In Russ.)
Cournède B., Denk O. Finance and Economic Growth in OECD and G20 Countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 2015, no. 1223, 60 p. URL: Link
