Finance and Credit

Abstracting and Indexing

Referativny Zhurnal VINITI RAS
LCCN Permalink
Google Scholar

Online available



Cyberleninka (24 month OA embargo)

The beneficial ownership of income concept: How to validate reduced rate of corporate withholding tax

Vol. 18, Iss. 11, NOVEMBER 2019

Received: 27 March 2019

Received in revised form: 10 September 2019

Accepted: 28 October 2019

Available online: 29 November 2019

Subject Heading: FISCAL SYSTEM

JEL Classification: E6, H2

Pages: 25212533

Lapin D.A. Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation

ORCID id: not available

Subject The article analyzes the law enforcement practice in the context of resolution of tax disputes arising from the application of double tax treaties' (DTT) benefits by taxpayers of corporate income tax. It confirms the justified use of DTT benefits by taxpayers and tax agents.
Objectives I determine trends in the law enforcement activities of tax and judicial authorities in the Russian Federation related to the application of the concept of beneficial ownership of income, and formulate criteria for assigning a person to the beneficial owner category.
Methods The study employs classical methods of economic analysis, induction and deduction, as well as the comparative method.
Results I analyzed certain indicators and criteria of eligibility for beneficial owner of income status; defined a strategy for validating the use of reduced rates of withholding tax. The findings may be helpful for corporate income tax administration.
Conclusions Despite the emerging court practice, which in most cases is against taxpayers, I conclude that to have a successful mechanism for confirming the beneficial ownership of income, it is important to create a detailed defense file containing the necessary information on disposal and use of received income. The key point here is substance over form.

Keywords: beneficial owner of income, actual right to income, law enforcement practice, double tax treaty, withholding tax


  1. Khavanova I.A. Mezhdunarodnye dogovory Rossiiskoi Federatsii ob izbezhanii dvoinogo nalogooblozheniya: monografiya [International Double Tax Treaties in the Russian Federation: a monograph]. Moscow, Yurisprudentsiya Publ., 2016, 349 p.
  2. Povetkina N.A. Finansovaya ustoichivost' Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Pravovaya doktrina i praktika obespecheniya: monografiya [Financial sustainability of the Russian Federation. Legal doctrine and practice to ensure it]. Moscow, Kontrakt Publ., 2016, 344 p.
  3. Machekhin V.A., Marshankulova O.S. [Preventing Inappropriate Treaty Abuse of Privileges Granted under Agreements for the Avoidance of Double Taxation in the BEPS Action 6 Report]. Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2017, no. 1, pp. 9299. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  4. Machekhin V.A. [Tax Deoffshorization in Russia and Project BEPS: A Comparison]. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina = Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), 2016, no. 6, pp. 107117. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  5. Andrianova N.G. [Practical problems of realization of deoffshorization legislation in the Russian Federation]. Problemy sovremennoi nauki i obrazovaniya = Current Problems of Science and Education, 2017, no. 35, pp. 3539. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  6. Arakelov S.A. [Developing the concept of beneficial ownership for income: Approaches of Federal Tax Service considering relevant court decisions]. Zakon = Law, 2017, no. 5, pp. 4556. (In Russ.)
  7. Ledeneva Yu.V. [The Concept of the Actual Right to Income: Enforcement Aspects of Implementation]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 3, pp. 106115. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  8. Machekhin V.A. [Beneficial ownership in Russian Tax Law]. Nalogoved, 2017, no. 4, pp. 5061. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  9. Kirillov A.V., Vasil'ev N.A. [The Actual Right to Income: Holding Companies Are at Risk]. Nalogi-zhurnal = Taxes (Journal), 2018, no. 2, pp. 1014. (In Russ.)
  10. Anishchenko D.E. [Conception of Actual Right to Incomes in the Russian Judicial Practice]. Nalogi-zhurnal = Taxes (Journal), 2016, no. 4, pp. 2629. (In Russ.)
  11. Kanashevskii V.A. [The Concept of Beneficial Ownership in Russian Judicial Practice (Private Law Aspects)]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2016, no. 9, pp. 2738. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  12. Khavanova I.A. [Concept of Beneficiary Owner (Proprietor) in Tax Law]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2014, no. 12, pp. 50-60. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  13. Bruk B.Ya. [Beneficiary Owner Concept Codification Outlooks in the Russian Tax Legislation]. Zakon = Law, 2014, no. 8, pp. 43-57. (In Russ.)
  14. Polezharova L.V. [New Approaches to the Development of the Mechanism for Control of the Beneficial Owner of Income in the Russian Economic Context]. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics. Taxes. Law, 2016, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 111121. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  15. Vasil'ev A.Yu. [Approaches for beneficial ownership determination]. Nalogoved, 2017, no. 6, pp. 2837. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  16. Litvinova K.Yu., Shtukmaster I.B. [Beneficial owner of income: Who is that?]. Nalogoved, 2018, no. 9, pp. 4149. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  17. Fedorova O.S. [Issue Topic: Corporate income tax: Relevant issues from tax consulting practice]. Nalogi i finansovoe pravo = Tax and Financial Law, 2016, no. 7, pp. 8110. (In Russ.)
  18. Nikolaev A.V. [Beneficial Ownership Under BEPS: Between Unsuccessful Attempt and Universal Rule]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, 2018, no. 12, pp. 4650. (In Russ.)
  19. Gorokhov A.I. [The application of the concept of the beneficial owner in the current Russian tax disputes case law]. Original'nye issledovaniya, 2018, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 47. (In Russ.) URL: Link

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 26, Iss. 6
June 2020