Finance and Credit

Abstracting and Indexing

Referativny Zhurnal VINITI RAS
LCCN Permalink
Google Scholar

Online available



Cyberleninka (24 month OA embargo)

Social policy: Challenges, opportunities, outlook

Vol. 25, Iss. 2, FEBRUARY 2019

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 25 December 2018

Received in revised form: 14 January 2019

Accepted: 28 January 2019

Available online: 28 February 2019

Subject Heading: FISCAL SYSTEM

JEL Classification: Н53, Н55, I32, J11

Pages: 426–442

Savina T.N. National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University, Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, Russian Federation

Erastova K.O. National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University, Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, Russian Federation

Lebedeva O.N. National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University, Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, Russian Federation

ORCID id: not available

Subject The social policy is a dynamic object of research, which characterizes quite accurately the policy of the entire State. In modern conditions, the efficiency of its measures is designed to ensure the stability of the State, both socially and politically.
Objectives The purpose is to assess the efficiency of the government social policy.
Methods The study rests on general scientific methods of cognition, like methods of structural and functional analysis, dialectical and logical unity methods, traditional techniques of economic analysis and synthesis, as well as specific methods to assess the condition of the social policy.
Results In the process of assessing the efficiency of social policy, we identified a number of problems. We reviewed and summarized the results of socio-economic studies on the middle class assessment in Russia, estimated the level of household income differentiation, offered recommendations for improving the social policy efficiency.
Conclusions The modern social policy is characterized by low efficiency. Therefore, it requires targeted measures in the field of tax policy and socio-economic regulation. The findings may be used by public authorities to justify the social policy at the macro- and meso- level, while designing programs and strategies for socio-economic development of the region, the doctrine of social security, and by employment services.

Keywords: social policy, household income, middle class, subsistence minimum


  1. Keynes J.M. Obshchaya teoriya zanyatosti, protsenta i deneg [The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2007, 960 p.
  2. Malko A.V., Vyrleeva-Balaeva O.S. Prohibitions in legal policy of modern Russia: Social foundations. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities and Social Sciences, 2017, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 537–543. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  3. Hill Z., Gennetian L.A., Mendez J. A Descriptive Profile of State Child Care and Development Fund Policies in States with High Populations of Low-income Hispanic Children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 2019, vol. 47, pp. 111–123.
  4. Daguerre A. US Social Policy in the 21st Century: The Difficulties of Comprehensive Social Reform. Social Policy and Administration, 2011, vol. 45, iss. 4, pp. 389–407. URL: Link
  5. Copeland P., Daly M. Poverty and social policy in Europe 2020: Ungovernable and ungoverned. Policy and Politics, 2014, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 351–365. URL: Link
  6. Tsaurkubule Z. Towards Sustainable Development: Changing the Model of Social Policy in Latvia. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 2016, vol. 5, iss. 4, pp. 576–588. URL: Link
  7. Smyth P., Deeming C. The ‘Social Investment Perspective’ in Social Policy: A Longue Durée Perspective. Social Policy and Administration, 2016, vol. 50, iss. 6, pp. 673–690. URL: Link
  8. Barretti M.A. How are social problems viewed and analyzed in social work policy textbooks? Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 2016, vol. 43, iss. 4, pp. 135–160. URL: Link
  9. Chindarkar N., Howlett M., Ramesh M. Introduction to the Special Issue: 'Conceptualizing Effective Social Policy Design: Design Spaces and Capacity Challenges'. Public Administration and Development, 2017, vol. 37, iss. 1, pp. 3–14. URL: Link
  10. Bilal U., Cooper R., Abreu F. et al. Economic growth and mortality: Do social protection policies matter? International Journal of Epidemiology, 2017, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 1147–1156. URL: Link
  11. Bugubayeva R., Zhetpisbayeva M., Abeuova S. et al. The social policy in the Republic of Kazakhstan: Its efficiency and impact on the social stability development. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2016, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 264–273. URL: Link
  12. Banerjee M.M. 'We Routinely Borrow to Survive': Exploring the Financial Capability of Income-Poor People in India. Social Work, 2016, vol. 61, iss. 4, pp. 349–358.
  13. Tumanyants K., Sesina Yu. [Social expenditures of Russian regions in terms of 'input-output']. Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic Policy, 2017, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 128–149. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  14. Tadtaeva V.V., Kasaev K.R., Tomaev A.O. [Federal spending on social policy]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo = Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship, 2016, no. 11-4, pp. 137–140. (In Russ.)
  15. Kibanov A.Ya., Lovcheva M.V., Luk'yanova T.V. [State Social Policy For Youth: Models, Classification, Actual Problems]. Upravlenie personalom i intellektual'nymi resursami v Rossii, 2013, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 21–28. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  16. Korovyakovskaya N.D., Kholodenko Yu.A. [Social policy of the Russian State: Global challenges]. Trud i sotsial'nye otnosheniya = Labor and Social Relations, 2016, no. 3, pp. 50–62. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  17. Semenova L.Yu., Shapoval A.Yu. [Social policy as a component of the enterprise social policy]. Молодий Вчений, 2016, no. 10, pp. 413–416. URL: Link
  18. Kapuza A.V., Kersha Yu.D., Zakharov A.B., Khavenson T.E. [Educational Attainment and Social Inequality in Russia: Dynamics and Correlations with Education Policies]. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies, 2017, no. 4, pp. 10–35. URL: Link (In Russ.)

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 26, Iss. 6
June 2020