Finance and Credit
 

The impact of information asymmetry on the dividend policy

Vol. 23, Iss. 23, JUNE 2017

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 19 April 2017

Received in revised form: 11 May 2017

Accepted: 30 May 2017

Available online: 29 June 2017

Subject Heading: THEORY OF FINANCE

JEL Classification: C39, D82, G35

Pages: 1334-1342

https://doi.org/10.24891/fc.23.23.1334

Fedorova E.A. Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
ecolena@mail.ru

Teterina E.A. Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
katet13@gmail.com

Subject The article considers internal factors influencing the dividend policy of companies. The focus is on the information asymmetry (which is measured by a deviation of actual earnings from expected), and on how a form of ownership (State or private) affects the information asymmetry and the entire dividend policy.
Objectives The study aims to explore the dependence of dividend payments on internal indices and characteristics of the company, to find out whether the existing dividend theories are applicable in the Russian reality.
Methods The empirical basis includes data on 50 Russian enterprises for the period from 2009 to 2015. We selected several variables to perform a regression analysis (the least square method).
Results The study reveals an inverse relation between information asymmetry and dividend payments, in other words, when the asymmetry is higher, there is less chance that shareholders receive their dividends. We divide companies in two groups: State-owned and private. The analysis shows that State-owned companies pay dividends more often.
Conclusions In Russia, payment of dividends is not an instrument for communicating information to capital markets.

Keywords: dividend policy, information asymmetry, State-owned company, dividend signaling, signaling hypothesis

References:

  1. Bhattacharya S. Imperfect Information, Dividend Policy and the “Bird in the Hand” Fallacy. The Bell Journal of Economics, 1979, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 259–270.
  2. Li K., Zhao X. Asymmetric Information and Dividend Policy. Financial Management, 2008, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 673–694.
  3. Denis D., Osobov D. Why Do Firms Pay Dividends? International Evidence on the Determinants of Dividend Policy. Journal of Financial Economics, 2008, vol. 89, iss. 1, pp. 62–82.
  4. Baker K., Dutta S., Saadi S. Impact of Financial and Multinational Operations on Manager Perceptions of Dividends. Global Finance Journal, 2008, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 171–186.
  5. Brav A., Graham J., Harvey C., Michaely R. Payout Policy in the 21st Century. Journal of Financial Economics, 2005, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 483–527.
  6. La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A. Corporate Ownership Around the World. NBER Working Paper, 1999, vol. 6625.
  7. Lukasevich I. [Dividend policy: Theoretical aspects and peculiarities in Russia]. Upravlenie korporativnymi finansami = Management of Corporate Finance, 2007, no. 4, pp. 228–241. (In Russ.)
  8. Ladan L.E. [Company's dividend policy: Performance evaluation]. Novaya nauka: Opyt, traditsii, innovatsii = New Science: Experience, Tradition, Innovation, 2016, no. 12-1, pp. 101–104. (In Russ.)
  9. Grebennikova V.A., Podofedenko A.A. [Dividend policy of a public company and its legal framework in Russia]. Zametki uchenogo = Notes of Scientist, 2016, no. 3, pp. 19–25. (In Russ.)
  10. Abrutyn S., Turner R.W. Taxes and Firms' Dividend Policies: Survey Results. National Tax Journal, 1990, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 491–496.
  11. Byun H., Hwang L., Lee W. How Does Ownership Concentration Exacerbate Information Asymmetry Among Equity Investors? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2011, vol. 19, iss. 5, pp. 511–534. doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2011.06.002
  12. Anderson R., Duru C., Reeb D.M. Founders, Heirs, and Corporate Opacity in the United States. Journal of Financial Economics, 2009, vol. 92, iss. 2, pp. 205–222. Available at: Link
  13. Drobetz W., Grüninger M.C., Hirschvogl S. Information Asymmetry and the Value of Cash. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2010, vol. 34, iss. 9, pp. 2168–2184.
  14. Choi J.J., Sami H., ‎Zhou H. The Impacts of State Ownership on Information Asymmetry: Evidence from an Emerging Market. China Journal of Accounting Research, 2010, vol. 3, iss. 1, pp. 13–48.
  15. Hope O.K., Thomas W.B., Vyas D. Transparency, Ownership, and Financing Constraints in Private Firms. Available at: Link
  16. Wang X., Manry D., Wandler S. The impact of government ownership on dividend policy in China. Advances in Accounting, 2011, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 366–372.
  17. Allen F., Michaely R. Payout Policy. In: Handbook of Economics and Finance. G. Constantinides, M. Harris, R. Stulz (eds). Amsterdam, Elsevier, North-Holland, 2003, pp. 337–429.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 24, Iss. 10
October 2018

Archive