+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Finance and Credit
 

Methodological framework for regional program-based budget rationale

Vol. 22, Iss. 23, JUNE 2016

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 19 April 2016

Received in revised form: 11 May 2016

Accepted: 25 May 2016

Available online: 29 June 2016

Subject Heading: FISCAL SYSTEM

JEL Classification: E62, E63, H77

Pages: 36-49

Davydova L.V. Orel State University named after I.S. Turgenev (former Prioksky State University), Orel, Russian Federation
1946@orel.ru

Tkacheva T.Yu. Southwest State University, Kursk, Russian Federation
Tat-tkacheva@yandex.ru

Importance The issue of methodology formation for program-based expenditures at the regional level in the context of choosing adequate mechanisms and instruments of fiscal activities by government authorities is still understudied. State jobs that are developed for subordinate authorities are not the instruments for program implementation and, in fact, they do not comply with the principle of payment for actually provided services; in reality, it is the estimate-based funding.
Objectives The purpose of the study is to develop methodological support to the transformation of the system of public (municipal) finance management through creating the mechanisms and instruments of program-based budgeting of the region.
Methods Using econometric methods, we analyzed budget expenditure and the planned volume of budgetary allocations to implement programs in the Kursk oblast for 2011–2015.
Results The paper presents a systems approach to the program-based principle of budget formation of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation. We developed methodological framework for program expenditure formation at the regional level, and offered a program-based budget expenditure classification of the principal manager of budgetary funds.
Conclusions and Relevance The budget classification of the program-based budget should be linked to organizational structure and functions of the key spending units. In the system of public finance, it should ensure the integration and systematization of information about the condition of budgetary target programs. A program-based budget formation provides transparency of the budget process, thus contributing to effective performance of public authorities in achieving strategic goals of socio-economic development.

Keywords: program-based budget, program costs, program-based budgeting models

References:

  1. Mathews R. The Theory and Practice of Equalization. A Report for The Queensland Government, 1993.
  2. Shah A. The Reform of Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Developing and Emerging Market Economies. Washington, D.C., World Bank, Policy and Research Series, 1994, no. 23.
  3. Sevryukova L.V., Tkacheva T.Yu., Rykunova V.L. Aktual'nye voprosy nalogovogo administrirovaniya na sovremennom etape razvitiya rossiiskoi nalogovoi sistemy: monografiya [Topical issues of tax administration at the modern stage of the Russian tax system development: a monograph]. Kursk, SWSU Publ., 2010, 132 p.
  4. Afanas'ev M.P., Alekhin B.I., Kravchenko A.I., Kradinov P.G. [A program-based budget: purpose, objectives, classification and principles of formation]. Finansovyi zhurnal = Financial Journal, 2010, no. 3, pp. 5–18. (In Russ.)
  5. Artemenkov S.B. [Evaluating the efficiency of inter-budgetary relations in the Russian Federation]. Finansy = Finance, 2012, no. 7, pp. 79–80. (In Russ.)
  6. Belenchuk A.A., Busarova A.V., Lavrov A.M. [Transition to the program-based budget: the French experience and Russian practice]. Finansy = Finance, 2012, no. 7, pp. 15–20. (In Russ.)
  7. Akhokas I.I., Gekht A.N. [On the assessment of efficiency of budgetary funds use]. Finansy= Finance, 2012, no. 4, pp. 8–11. (In Russ.)
  8. Slepov V.A., Shuba V.B., Burlachkov V.K. [Priority directions of inter-budgetary relations development]. Finansy = Finance, 2009, no. 3, pp. 25–29. (In Russ.)
  9. Shuvalov I.I. [Improving the legislation of constituent entities of the Russian Federation as a result of federal relations and local self-government reform]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2004, no. 9, pp. 3–10. (In Russ.)
  10. Gramlich E.M. Federalism and Federal Deficit Reduction. National Tax Journal, 1987, no. 40(3), pp. 299–313.
  11. Dollery B.E., Worthington A. Federal Expenditure and Fiscal Illusion: A test of the flypaper hypothesis in Australia. Publius, 1995, vol. 25. no. 1, pp. 23–34.
  12. Molchanova N.P. [Applying the program-target method to investment regulation at the regional level]. Audit i finansovyi analiz = Audit and Financial Analysis, 2010, no. 1, pp. 269–274. (In Russ.)
  13. Knight B. Endogenous Federal Grants and Crowd-out of State Government Spending: Theory and Evidence from the Federal Highway Aid Program. The American Economic Review, 2002, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 71–92.
  14. Case A.C., Hines J.R.Jr., Harvey S.R. Budget Spillovers and Fiscal Policy Interdependence: Evidence from the States. Journal of Public Economics, 1993, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 285–307.
  15. Grossman P.J. The Impact of Federal and State Grants on Local Government Spending: A test of the fiscal illusion hypothesis. Public Finance Quarterly, 1990, vol. 18, pp. 313–327.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 30, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive