+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ÈÄ «Ôèíàíñû è êðåäèò»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Finance and Credit
 

Coordinating the economic interests of the subjects of inter-budget relations under fiscal federalism development in Russia

Vol. 22, Iss. 10, MARCH 2016

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 24 November 2015

Accepted: 21 December 2015

Available online: 16 March 2016

Subject Heading: INTER-BUDGETARY RELATION

JEL Classification: Â00, Í77

Pages: 46-60

Baklaeva N.M. Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Pyatigorsk Branch, Pyatigorsk, Stavropol Krai, Russian Federation
n.m.baklaeva@mail.ru

Importance The article considers the urgent problems hampering the coordination and realization of economic interests of the Federal center, regions and municipalities at the present stage of the fiscal federalism development in Russia, and offers approaches to their solutions.
     Objectives The study aims to unveil the current issues of coordinating the economic interests of the subjects of inter-budget relations, and define ways to improve the inter-budget relations based on full realization of fiscal federalism principles for eliminating the contradictions between economic interests of the Federation, regions and municipalities.
     Methods The paper employs complex and systems approaches, which are realized through general scientific methods, i.e. scientific abstraction, analysis and synthesis. Standard analytical methods (comparison, summarization, and grouping) help assess the composition, structure and dynamics of income, expense, deficit (surplus), and the debt load of Russia's territorial budgets.
     Results The problems hampering the coordination of economic interests of the subjects of inter-budget relations and the fiscal federalism development in Russia include the excessive centralization of revenues of the budgetary system at the federal level; increased expenditure commitments of regions and municipalities that are not covered by the necessary volume of revenue sources; persisting differentiation of territories by the level of fiscal capacity.
     Conclusions It is crucial to perfect the system of inter-budget relations through expanding tax competence of regions and municipalities, eliminating the shortcomings of the existing system of distribution of the inter-budget transfers, providing regional and municipal authorities with sufficient permanent revenue sources to fulfil expenditure commitments.

Keywords: economic interests, inter-budget relations, fiscal federalism, revenue centralization, inter-budget transfers

References:

  1. Lavrov A.M. Mify i rify rossiiskogo byudzhetnogo federalizma [Myths and reefs of the Russian fiscal federalism]. Moscow, Magistr Publ., 1997, p. 5.
  2. Krokhina Yu.A. Byudzhetnoe pravo i rossiiskii federalism [Budgetary law and Russian federalism]. Moscow, NORMA Publ., 2002, p. 57.
  3. Gershkovich B.Ya. Ekonomicheskie interesy, stimulirovanie, motivatsiya i voprosy ekonomicheskoi politiki v Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Economic interests, incentives, motivation and economic policy issues in the Russian Federation]. Pyatigorsk, Pyatigorsk State Linguistic University Publ., 2005, p. 51.
  4. Gershkovich B.Ya. K voprosu o protivorechiyakh v sisteme ekonomicheskikh interesov. V kn.: Yubileinyi sbornik nauchnykh trudov “Gorizonty gumanitarnogo znaniya” [On contradictions in the system of economic interests. In: Horizons of humanitarian knowledge: a jubilee volume of research papers]. Pyatigorsk, Pyatigorsk State Linguistic University Publ., 1999, p. 166.
  5. Laikam K.E., Sharomova V.V. Mesto i rol' nalogovoi politiki v sovershenstvovanii mezhbyudzhetnykh otnoshenii [The place and role of the tax policy in improving the inter-budgetary relations]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 1998, no. 7, p. 12.
  6. Leksin V., Shvetsov A. Byudzhetnyi federalism v period krizisa i reform [The budgetary federalism under crisis and reforms]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 1998, no. 3, pp. 19–20.
  7. Weingast B.R. The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 1995, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–31.
  8. Tanzi V. Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization: A Review of Some Efficiency and Macroeconomic Aspects. In: Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1995. Washington, The World Bank, 1996, pp. 295–316.
  9. Fukasuku K., de Mello L.R. Fiscal Decentralisation and Macroeconomic Stability: The Experience of Large Developing and Transition Economies. In: Democracy, Decentralisation and Deficits in Latin America. K. Fukasuku and R. Hausmann (eds). Paris, OECD, 1998, pp. 121–148.
  10. Baklaeva N.M. Problemy realizatsii printsipov byudzhetnogo federalizma v RF. V kn.: Sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii Rossiiskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta im. G.V. Plekhanova i Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo torgovo-ekonomicheskogo universitetaAktual’nye voprosy ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regionov” [Problems of implementing the fiscal federalism principles in the Russian Federation. In: Topical Issues of Economic Development of Regions: Proceedings of the international scientific and practical conference of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics and the Russian State University of Trade and Economics]. Pyatigorsk, RIA-KMV Publ., 2013, p. 51.
  11. Ozerov N.V. Otsenka vozmozhnykh izmenenii po postupleniyu nalogovykh dokhodov v konsolidirovannyi byudzhet Rossiiskoi Federatsii po otdel’nym vidam nalogov v 2009 godu [Estimation of possible changes in tax revenues to the consolidated budget of the Russian Federation by certain types of taxes in 2009]. Audit i finansovyi analiz = Audit and Financial Analysis, 2009, no. 3. Available at: Link.
  12. Eremenko E.A. Spetsial'nye nalogovye rezhimy i kontseptsiya spravedlivosti nalogooblozheniya [Special tax treatments and the tax equity concept]. Finansy = Finance, 2015, no. 9, pp. 79–80.
  13. Malis N.I. Sovershenstvovanie nalogovogo mekhanizma – put' k povysheniyu dokhodov byudzheta [Improving the tax mechanism as a way to increase budget revenues]. Finansy = Finance, 2014, no. 4, p. 33.
  14. Levina V.V. Otsenka effektivnosti raspredeleniya mezhbyudzhetnykh transfertov na regional’nom urovne [Assessing the efficiency of intergovernmental transfers distribution at the regional level]. Finansy = Finance, 2015, no. 2, p. 14.
  15. Zubarevich N.V. Regional'noe razvitie i regional'naya politika v Rossii [Regional development and regional policy in Russia]. EKO = ECO, 2014, no. 4, p. 20.
  16. Tapsiev I.S., Fal'kova E.N. Novyi mekhanizm perechisleniya mezhbyudzhetnykh transfertov pod fakticheskuyu potrebnost': praktika, osobennosti i problemy [A new mechanism of inter-budgetary transfers against actual needs: practice, specifics and problems]. Finansy = Finance, 2015, no. 4, p. 39.
  17. Il'in V.V. Dolgovaya politika sub”ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii [The debt policy of the subjects of the Russian Federation]. Finansy = Finance, 2015, no. 8, p. 24.
  18. Mudrova N.V. Aktual'nye problemy formirovaniya dokhodov mestnykh byudzhetov [Urgent problems of local budget revenue generation]. Finansy = Finance, 2014, no. 3, p. 25.
  19. Baklaeva N.M. K voprosy o byudzhetnom regulirovanii v sisteme mezhbyudzhetnykh otnoshenii territorial'nogo urovnya [On budget regulation in the system of inter-budgetary relations at the territory level]. Ekonomicheskii vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Economic Bulletin of Rostov State University, 2006, no. 2, p. 77.
  20. Oates W. An Essay on Fiscal Federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 1999, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 1125–1126.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 30, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive