+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Finance and Credit
 

The efficiency of the Russian budgetary system from the standpoint of the global auction theory

Vol. 21, Iss. 42, NOVEMBER 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 29 June 2015

Accepted: 22 July 2015

Available online: 12 November 2015

Subject Heading: Financial system

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 46-53

Khvalynskii D.S. Altai State University, Barnaul, Altai Krai, Russian Federation
hdms@email.ru

Subject The article considers the efficiency of budget spending in the Russian Federation by means of public electronic procurement auctions. Transition to the contract system of procurement for State and municipal needs that became effective from January 1, 2014, and the corresponding radical change in the rules for public procurement in Russia enhanced the significance of the analysis of budget funds spending.
     Objectives The aim of the paper is to identify the conditions of the public electronic procurement auctions that have a direct impact on the level of budget funds efficiency in the Russian Federation.
     Methods
The paper employs statistical and comparison methods, and the systems analysis methods to analyze the revenue of the requests for quotation and electronic auctions. It is determined that the profitability of the auctioneer's requests for quotation is much higher as compared to the electronic auctions that represent the reverse English second-price auctions.
     Results The study reveals the conditions of electronic procurement auctions that have a direct impact on the efficiency of budget funds spending in the Russian Federation. The Russian system of public procurement has certain conditions, under which the first-price auctions yield much more revenue for the auctioneer than the second-price auctions do.
     Conclusions
I conclude that the Federal Law of January 01, 2014 № 44-FZ, does not consider the internationally recognized provisions of the auction theory with regard to the influence of external environment on auction revenue, and this makes the Russian budget and financial system extremely inefficient.

Keywords: budgetary expenditures, auction theory, contract system, procurement, revenue equivalence theorem

References:

  1. Borgers T., Van Damme E. Auction Theory for Auction Design. In: Auctioning Public Assets. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 230–256.
  2. Klemperer P. Auctions: Theory and Practice. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 2004.
  3. Maskin E. The Unity of Auction Theory: Milgrom’s Masterclass. Journal of Economic Literature, 2004, no. 42(4), pp. 1102–1115.
  4. Combinatorial Auctions. P. Cramton, Y. Shoham, R. Steinberg (Eds). Boston, MIT Press, 2006.
  5. Eichstädt T. Applying Auction Theory to Procurement Auctions – An Empirical Study Among German Corporations. In: Negotiation, Auctions, and Market Engineering, Volume 2 of Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Springer, 2006, pp. 58–67.
  6. Harstad R.M., Pekeč A. Relevance to Practice and Auction Theory: A Memorial Essay for Michael Rothkopf. Interfaces, 2008, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 367–380.
  7. Parsons S., Rodriguez-Aguilar J.A., Klein M. Auctions and Bidding: A Guide for Computer Scientists. ACM Computing Surveys, 2011, vol. 43, no. 2, 59 p.
  8. Maasland E. Essays in Auction Theory. Tilburg University, CentER Dissertation Series, 2012, no. 311, 176 p.
  9. Kaplan T.R., Zamir S. Advances in Auctions. In: Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, Elsevier, 2015, vol. 4, Chapter 7, pp. 381–453.
  10. Pham L., Teich J., Wallenius H., Wallenius J. Multi-attribute Online Reverse Auctions: Recent Research Trends. European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, no. 242, pp. 1–9.
  11. Vickrey W. Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders. Journal of Finance, 1961, vol. 16, iss. 1, pp. 8–37.
  12. Myerson R. Optimal Auction Design. Mathematics of Operations Research, 1981, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 58–73.
  13. Maasland E., Onderstal S. Going, Going, Gone! A Swift Tour of Auction Theory and Its Applications. De Economist, 2006, no. 154(2), pp. 197–249.
  14. Maskin E., Van den Bos W., Li J., Lau T., Cohen J.D., Montague P.R., McClure S.M. The Value of Victory: Social Origins of the Winner’s Curse in Common Value Auctions. Judgment and Decision Making, 2008, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 483–492.
  15. Maskin E., Riley J. Auction Theory with Private Values. American Economic Review, 1985, no. 75(2), pp. 150–155.
  16. Maskin E., Riley J. Optimal Auctions with Risk Averse Buyers. Econometrica, 1984, no. 52(6), pp. 1473–1518.
  17. Milgrom P., Segal I. Envelope Theorems for Arbitrary Choice Sets. Econometrica, 2002, vol. 70, iss. 2, pp. 583–601.
  18. Milgrom P., Weber R. A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding. Econometrica, 1982, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1089–1122.
  19. Riley J., Samuelson W. Optimal Auctions. The American Economic Review, 1981, vol. 71, iss. 3, pp. 381–392.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 30, Iss. 3
March 2024

Archive