+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Finance and Credit
 

Assessing the impact of tax preferences on financial results of advanced technology business in Russia

Vol. 21, Iss. 36, SEPTEMBER 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 15 May 2015

Accepted: 4 June 2015

Available online: 16 October 2015

Subject Heading: FISCAL SYSTEM

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 19-32

Gorbacheva N.V. Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of Siberian Branch of RAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
nata_lis@mail.ru

Untura G.A. Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of Siberian Branch of RAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
galina.untura@gmail.com

Subject The article presents a comparative analysis of financial performance results of a Russian large-scale advanced technology enterprise under the impact of tax preferences, which are effective in specific territories of federal significance, i.e. Territories of Advanced Development (TAD), Special Economic Zones (SEZ), and Skolkovo Innovation Center.
     Objectives
The purpose of the study is to present quantitative assessment of State support on financial performance of enterprise that implements a large-scale innovation project within PPP arrangements.
     Methods The quantitative assessment of the impact of tax preferences rests on traditional methods of project analysis.
     Results
We present a review of different approaches to the assessment of the impact of State support. The article includes experimental calculations for the Russian advanced technology enterprise implementing the innovation project under PPP arrangements based on three scenarios of taxation in specific territories of federal significance (TAD, SEZ, and Skolkovo Innovation Center).
     Conclusions and Relevance
The comparative analysis of financial performance of specific Russian enterprise, which hypothetically was located in different specific territories of federal significance (TAD, SEZ, and Skolkovo Innovation Center), displays an important role of the State in increasing the private sector's interest in PPP projects. We prove the comparative advantage of tax preferences provided in Territories of Advanced Development.

Keywords: tax preferences, tax burden, net present value, quasi-profitability, public-private partnership

References:

  1. Shakhrai S.M., Vilenskii P.L., Kosov V.V., Livshits V.N., Smolyak S.A., Shakhnazarov A.G. Sistemnaya otsenka effektivnosti investitsionnykh (innovatsionnykh) proektov [A system to assess the efficiency of investment (innovative) projects]. Moscow, State Research Institute of System Analysis of Account Chamber of Russian Federation Publ., 2010, 101 p.
  2. Proektnaya ekonomika v usloviyakh innovatsionnogo razvitiya: kontseptsiya, modeli, mekhanizmy [Project economics under innovative development: concept, models, mechanisms]. Novosibirsk, Parallel' Publ., 2013, 163 p.
  3. Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo kak instrument podderzhki innovatsii [Public-private partnership as an instrument to support innovation]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2012, 516 p.
  4. Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo v nauchno-innovatsionnoi sfere [Public-private partnership in the scientific and innovative sphere]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2010, 330 p.
  5. Simachev Yu.V., Kuzyk M.G., Feigina V.V. Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka innovatsii v Rossii: chto mozhno skazat' o vozdeistvii na kompanii nalogovykh i finansovykh mekhanizmov? [State support of innovations in Russia: what can be said of the impact of tax and financial mechanisms on companies?]. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta = Russian Management Journal, 2014, vol. 12, pp. 7–38.
  6. Untura G.A. Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka razvitiya innovatsionnykh territorii Rossii [State support to Russian innovative territories’ development]. Moscow, Ankil Publ., 2013, pp. 744–769.
  7. Sudarikov A.L., Gribovskii A.V. Gosudarstvenno-chastnye partnerstva v sfere nauki i innovatsii: zarubezhnyi opyt [Public-private partnerships in the sphere of science and innovation: foreign experience]. Innovatsii = Innovation, 2012, no. 7, pp. 47–59.
  8. Lenchuk E., Vlaskin G. Formirovanie institutov innovatsionnogo razvitiya v Rossii. V kn.: Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo v innovatsionnykh sistemakh [Formation of institutes for innovative development in Russia. In: Public-private partnership in innovative systems]. Moscow, LKI Publ., 312 p.
  9. Nalogovoe stimulirovanie innovatsionnykh protsessov [Tax incentives for innovative processes]. Moscow, IMEMO RAS Publ., 2009, 160 p.
  10. Nauchnaya i innovatsionnaya politika. Rossiya i mir. 2011–2012 [Scientific and innovative policy. Russia and the world. 2011–2012]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2013, 480 p.
  11. Primakov E. Rossiya. Nadezhdy i trevogi [Russia. Hopes and concerns]. Moscow, Tsentrpoligraf Publ., 2015, 224 p.
  12. Ivanov D.S., Kuzyk M.G., Simachev Yu.V. Stimulirovanie innovatsionnoi deyatel'nosti rossiiskikh proizvodstvennykh kompanii: vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya [Boosting the innovative activity of Russian manufacturers: possibilities and constraints]. Forsait = Foresight, 2012, no. 6, pp. 18–42.
  13. Gorbacheva N.V., Evseenko A.V., Novikova T.S., Suslov D.V., Untura G.A., Shmagirev A.V. Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo: otsenka paritetnosti vzaimodeistviya uchastnikov innovatsionnykh proektov [Public-private partnership: assessing the parity of interaction of innovative project participants]. Innovatsii = Innovation, 2013, no. 5, pp. 45–55.
  14. Gorbacheva N.V., Evseenko A.V., Zabolotskii A.A., Novikova T.S., Untura G.A., Shmagirev A.V. Nanokompozitnaya keramika: vozmozhnosti i perspektivy razvitiya v Rossii i Sibiri [Nanocomposite ceramics: opportunities and development prospects for Russia and Siberia]. Novosibirsk, Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of Siberian Branch of RAS Publ., 2014, pp. 251–318.
  15. Untura G.A., Novikova T.S., Gorbacheva N.V. Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka NIOKR: otsenka vliyaniya na finansovye rezul'taty innovatsionnogo proekta [State support to R&D: assessing the influence of innovative project on financial performance]. Menedzhment innovatsii = Management of Innovation, 2014, no. 4, pp. 280–293.
  16. Ibragimov R.G. Ekonomicheskii analiz upravlencheskikh reshenii: soglasovannost' finansovoi modeli otsenki [Economic analysis of management decisions: consistency of the financial model of assessment]. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta = Russian Management Journal, 2007, vol. 5, pp. 53–84.
  17. Titov V.V., Zhigul'skii G.V. Vektor izmeneniya nalogooblozheniya na promyshlennom predpriyatii [A vector of change in taxation at the industrial enterprise]. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya = Region: Economics and Sociology, 2013, no. 3, pp. 260–274.
  18. Saifieva S.N. Nalogovaya nagruzka na klyuchevye sektory rossiiskoi ekonomiki v 2000–2008 gg [Tax burden on the key sectors of the Russian economy in 2000–2008]. Finansy = Finance, 2010, no. 8, pp. 37–47.
  19. Pavlov P. Vtoroi start osobykh ekonomicheskikh zon v Rossii [The second start of special economic zones in Russia]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations, 2010, no. 8, pp. 69–75.
  20. Varnavskii V. Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo: nekotorye voprosy teorii i praktiki [Public-private partnership: certain theoretical and practical issues]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations, 2011, no. 9, pp. 41–50.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 30, Iss. 3
March 2024

Archive