+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Finance and Credit
 

Ownership structure in the financial market of the neo-continental model countries (the EAEU member States case)

Vol. 21, Iss. 35, SEPTEMBER 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 17 July 2015

Received in revised form: 24 July 2015

Accepted: 31 July 2015

Available online: 7 October 2015

Subject Heading: Financial system

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 2-11

Zhukova T.V. Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO) of RAS, Moscow, Russian Federation
ttanya2001@gmail.com

Importance EAEU member States have a neo-continental model of financial market, which is rather similar to the continental model of developed European countries. However, they are different due to limited financial resources and functional and structural disproportions of their financial markets. Under economic integration, the key issues are gradual harmonization of ownership structure and a parallel transition to a more progressive ownership structure, focused on capital mobilization.
     Objectives The study aims to investigate general and specifics features of ownership structures, analyze possibilities of the neo-continental ownership model on the case of the banking system and infrastructure financial institutions of EAEU member countries.
     Methods I employed a systems analysis, qualitative and quantitative analyses of ownership structure in the banking system and infrastructure financial institutions, and the comparative method to reveal the existing ownership structure models by countries versus the neo-continental model.
     Results The analysis, despite the differences in the dominant type of property owners, confirms the sustainability of the neo-continental model and related restrictions on capital market development, even though there are privatization processes and implementation of certain elements of the policy for ownership structure regulation in EAEU member States.
     Conclusions For the neo-continental model to transfer to the new qualitative level, it is crucial to have a national policy to manage the ownership structure. The policy should stimulate the fractional nature of the ownership, reasonable involvement of the State in fund-raising, prudent harmonization of ownership structures in EAEU countries, and maintain the key role of the State (development institutions).

Keywords: neo-continental model, total ownership, fractional ownership, privatization, banking system

References:

  1. Mirkin Ya.M. Finansovoe budushchee Rossii: ekstremumy, bumy i sistemnye riski [The financial future of Russia: extremes, booms and systemic risks]. Moscow, GELEOS Publishing House, Kepital Treid Kompani Publ., 2011, 480 p.
  2. Mirkin Ya.M. Rynok tsennykh bumag Rossii: vozdeistvie fundamental'nykh faktorov, prognoz i politika razvitiya [The securities market of Russia: the impact of fundamental factors, forecast, and development policy]. Moscow, Al'pina Pablisher Publ., 2002, 624 p.
  3. Finansovye strategii modernizatsii ekonomiki: mirovaya praktika [The financial strategy of economy modernization: the world practice]. Moscow, Magistr Publ., 2014, 496 p.
  4. Abalkina A.A. Razvitie bankovskikh sistem stran SNG: osobennosti finansovogo posrednichestva i otkrytost' [Developing the banking systems of the CIS countries: specifics of financial intermediation and openness]. Kazakhskii ekonomicheskii vestnik = Kazakh Economic Review, 2013, no. 2-3, pp. 70–78.
  5. Pozdyshev V.A. Razvitie bankovskogo regulirovaniya v Rossii v 2015 godu [Developing the banking regulation in Russia in 2015]. Den'gi i kredit = Money and Credit, 2015, no. 1, pp. 5–8.
  6. Niyazbekova Sh.U. [The current state of equity market development of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Naukovedenie, 2014, no. 1. (In Russ.) Available at: Link.
  7. Kovalev M., Kolesnik K. Obzor pokazatelei belorusskogo bankovskogo rynka i analiz effektivnosti bankov v 2011 godu [Overview of the Belarusian banking market indicators and analysis of the efficiency of banks in 2011]. Vestnik assotsiatsii belorusskikh bankov = Bulletin of Association of Belarusian Banks, 2012, no. 7, pp. 15–22.
  8. Abdynasyrov U.T. Rynok tsennykh bumag Kyrgyzskoi Respubliki i sovershenstvovanie gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya [Securities market of the Kyrgyz Republic and improving the State regulation]. Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, 2002, 224 p.
  9. Abraamyan M. Tendentsii razvitiya rynka tsennykh bumag Respubliki Armeniya [Development trends in the securities market of the Republic of Armenia]. Uslugi i tekhnologii = Services and Technologies, 2014, no. 5, pp. 20–22.
  10. Polterovich V.M. Privatizatsiya i ratsional'naya struktura sobstvennosti [Privatization and the rational ownership structure]. Moscow, Institute of Economics of RAS Publ., 2012, 66 p.
  11. Markosyan A.Kh., Matevosyan E. Formirovanie institutsional'nykh osnov prava sobstvennosti v Respublike Armeniya [Building the institutional framework for ownership title in the Republic of Armenia]. Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki = Problems of Modern Economics, 2004, no. 4. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  12. Privatizatsiya v Rossii i drugikh stranakh SNG. Sbornik obzorov [Privatization in Russia and other CIS countries: a collection of reviews]. Moscow, Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of RAS Publ., 2003, 272 p.
  13. Ugarina T.A. Struktura otnoshenii sobstvennosti: ponyatie, sushchnost', dinamika preobrazovanii v Respublike Belarus' [The structure of property relations: concept, the essence, and dynamics of changes in Belarus]. Ekonomicheskii byulleten' NIEI = Economic Bulletin of Economy Research Institute, 2014, no. 1, pp. 1–14.
  14. Katz R. Japan: The System That Soured: The Rise and Fall of the Japanese Economic Miracle. Armonk, NY, M.E. Sharpe Inc., 1998, 438 p.
  15. Kim S.H. Finance and Growth of the Korean Economy from 1960 to 2004. Seoul Journal of Economics, 2007, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 377–418.
  16. Pakhomova L.F. Modeli protsvetaniya (Singapur, Malaiziya, Tailand, Indoneziya) [Models of prosperity (Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia)]. Moscow, Institute of Oriental Studies of RAS Publ., 2007, 256 p.
  17. Din Zh., Kovalev M.M. Kitaiskie ekonomicheskie reformy: opyt, vozmozhnosti primeneniya v Belarusi [Chinese economic reforms: experience, possibility to apply in Belarus]. Minsk, BSU Publ., 2002, 227 p.
  18. Strategii prevrashcheniya Kitaya v superindustrial'noe gosudarstvo (1996–2050 gg.) [China's strategy of turning into a super industrial State (1996–2050)]. Moscow, Pamyatniki istoricheskoi mysli Publ., 2002, 200 p.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 30, Iss. 3
March 2024

Archive