+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Finance and Credit
 

A comparative analysis of financial performance of companies within the modern theory of capital cost and capital structure by Brusov-Filatova-Orekhova (BFO theory)

Vol. 21, Iss. 31, AUGUST 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 2 April 2015

Accepted: 28 April 2015

Available online: 31 August 2015

Subject Heading: BUSINESS VALUE

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 46-59

Brusov P.N. Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
pnb1983@yahoo.com

Filatova T.V. Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
mfilatova@fa.ru

Orekhova N.P. Institute of Management, Business and Law, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation
fet_mir@bk.ru

Importance We examine the dependence of the cost of capital (Weighted Average Cost of Capital, WACC) on the leverage level (L), company life (n) and corporate income tax (t) for companies of arbitrary age (n) that continue operating in the market, as well as for those retreated from the market.
     Objectives The aim of the study is to make a comparative analysis of the cost of capital for companies of arbitrary age n, both operating in the market and those that exited the market.
     Methods All calculations are made within the modern theory of capital cost and capital structure by Brusov-Filatova-Orekhova (BFO). We investigate the dependence at different values of the cost of capital (equity, k0 and debt, kd).
     Results The comparative analysis shows that for companies that have exited the market, the BFO theory requires amendments, which we made in the course of the study.
     Conclusions It is possible to estimate the cost of capital (WACC) for companies that retreated from the market (and no longer exist) within the BFO theory as amended and adapted to the case. WACC for companies that ceased to exist is always higher than that of the companies that continue operating in the market (with the same parameters, i.e. leverage level L, company's life (or age) n, corporate income tax t, and capital cost (equity and debt).

Keywords: capital cost, company age, leverage level, Brusov-Filatova-Orekhova theory, Modigliani-Miller theory

References:

  1. Brusov P.N., Filatova T.V., Orekhova N.P. Sovremennye korporativnye finansy i investitsii. Monografiya [Modern corporate finance and investment: a monograph]. Moscow, KnoRus Publ., 2013, 517 p.
  2. Modigliani F., Miller M. The Cost of Capital, Corporate Finance and the Theory of Investment. American Economic Review, 1958, no. 48, pp. 261–297.
  3. Modigliani F., Miller M. Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction. American Economic Review, 1963, no. 53, pp. 147–175.
  4. Modigliani F., Miller M. Some Estimates of the Cost of Capital to the Electric Utility Industry, 1954–1957. American Economic Review, 1966, no. 56, pp. 333–391.
  5. Myers S. Capital Structure. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2001, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 81–102.
  6. Perevozchikov A.G. O korrektnosti analoga formuly Modil'yani–Millera dlya konechnogo prognoznogo perioda [On correctness of the equivalent of the Modigliani–Miller formula for a finite forecast period]. Audit i finansovyi analiz = Audit and Financial Analysis, 2013, no. 4, pp. 135–137.
  7. Baker M., Wurgler J. Market Timing and Capital Structure. Journal of Finance, 2002, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 1–32.
  8. Beattie V., Goodacre A., Thomson S. Corporate Financing Decisions: UK Survey Evidence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2006, vol. 9-10, no. 32, pp. 1402–1434.
  9. Bikhchandani S., Hirshleifer D., Welch I. Learning from the Behavior of Others: Conformity, Fads, and Informational Cascades. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1998, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 151–170.
  10. Brennan M., Schwartz E. Corporate Income Taxes, Valuation, and the Problem of Optimal Capital Structure. Journal of Business, 1978, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 103–114.
  11. Korajczyk R.A., Levy A. Capital Structure Choice: Macroeconomic Conditions and Financial Constraints. Journal of Financial Economics, 2003, no. 68, pp. 75–109.
  12. Myers S., Majluf N. Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have. Journal of Financial Economics, 1984, vol. 2, no. 13, pp. 187–222.
  13. Hsia S. Coherence of the Modern Theories of Finance. Financial Review, 1981, no. 16, pp. 27–42.
  14. Leland H. Corporate Debt Value, Bond Covenants, and Optimal Capital Structure. Journal of Finance, 1994, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1213–1252.
  15. Rubinstein M. A Mean-Variance Synthesis of Corporate Financial Theory. Journal of Finance, 1973, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 167–181.
  16. Stiglitz J. A Re-examination of the Modigliani–Miller Theorem. American Economic Review, 1969, no. 59, pp. 784–793.
  17. Brennan M.J., Schwartz E.S. Optimal Financial Policy and Firm Valuation. Journal of Finance, 1984, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 593–607.
  18. Dittmar A., Thakor A. Why Do Firms Issue Equity? Journal of Finance, 2007, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 1–54.
  19. Drobetz W., Pensa P., Wanzenried G. Firm Characteristics and Dynamic Capital Structure Adjustment. 2006. Available at: Link.
  20. Fischer E., Heinkel R., Zechner J. Dynamic Capital Structure Choice: Theory and Tests. Journal of Finance, 1989, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 19–40.
  21. Graham J., Harvey C. The Theory and Practice of Corporate Finance: Evidence from the Field. Journal of Financial Economics, 2001, no. 60, pp. 187–243.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 30, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive