+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Finance and Credit
 

On invalidity of arguments of those supporting the flat income tax scale for individuals

Vol. 21, Iss. 30, AUGUST 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 5 February 2015

Accepted: 14 May 2015

Available online: 30 August 2015

Subject Heading: FISCAL SYSTEM

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 18-28

Grekov I.E. State University - Education-Science-Production Complex, Orel, Russian Federation
grekov-igor@mail.ru

Senina O.V. Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Orel Branch, Orel, Russian Federation
o-seninav@mail.ru

Subject The article reviews the relevance of reforming the rate of individual income tax (personal income tax), and major macroeconomic trends in the society, which have developed as a result of manipulations with basic elements of the tax, namely, tax rate.
     Objectives The study aims to assess the main arguments in favor of the effectiveness of 13% flat tax rate, to analyze changes in tax revenues in relation to household incomes, the role of tax in the consolidated budget of the country, and the degree of legalization of household incomes as a result of applying the flat rate tax.
     Methods In the course of economical and statistical comparison, we have revealed quantitative and qualitative relations of tax revenues growth and monetary income growth dynamics (labor compensation fund).
     Results Despite increased tax revenues, the role of tax in the consolidated budget of the country is still low. The growth of incomes of people and the simplification of tax administration procedures have not reduced differentiation of household incomes, and the extent of their legalization remained unchanged.
     Conclusions The uniform rate of tax keeps stable inflow of tax revenues to the budget; however, it does not ensure realization of the tax equity principle to the full extent. These circumstances trigger for stage-by-stage return to progressive taxation to provide for additional revenues to the budget and reduce tax burden on social groups of the population.

Keywords: tax, income, individuals, flat rate, progressive taxation

References:

  1. Reforma nalogooblozheniya dokhodov naseleniya v Rossii: rezul'taty v 2000–2007 gg [Reform of the household income taxation in Russia: results in 2000–2007]. Moscow, IET Publ., 2008, 256 p.
  2. Nikolaev I.A. O vozvrate k progressivnoi shkale [On return to progressive taxation]. Finansovye i bukhgalterskie konsul'tatsii = Financial and Accounting Consultations, 2007, no. 3, pp. 4–7.
  3. Kudryashova E.V. Primenenie norm nalogovogo kodeksa o fakticheskoi sposobnosti k uplate naloga [Applying the Tax Code norms on actual ability to pay tax]. Finansy = Finance, 2003, no. 10, p. 29.
  4. Maiburov I.A. Teoriya i istoriya nalogooblozheniya [Theory and history of taxation]. Moscow, YUNITI-DANA Publ., 2007, 495 p.
  5. Il'in A.E. Nalogovyi mekhanizm gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya dokhodov [Tax mechanism of State regulation of incomes]. Finansy = Finance, 2005, no. 3, pp. 16–17.
  6. Krasnoperova O.A. Printsipy nalogooblozheniya kak sostavnoi element nalogovogo mekhanizma [Principles of taxation as a component of the tax mechanism]. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2012, no. 3, pp. 51–60.
  7. 9. Lykova L.N. Nalogovaya sistema Rossii: obshchee i osobennoe [The tax system of Russia: general and special issues]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2005, 444 p.
  8. Panskov V.G. O printsipakh nalogooblozheniya fizicheskikh lits [On the principles of taxation of individuals]. Finansy = Finance, 2008, no. 1, pp. 28–33.
  9. Panskov V.G. O vozmozhnykh napravleniyakh nalogovoi politiki [On possible directions of the tax policy]. Finansy = Finance, 2012, no. 5, pp. 30–33.
  10. Kuznetsova I. Nalogooblozhenie kak faktor ekonomicheskogo rosta [Taxation as a factor of economic growth]. Chelovek i trud = Мan and Labor, 2007, no. 3, pp. 59–62.
  11. Kotov K.V. Legalizatsiya dokhodov kak sposob bor'by s tenevoi ekonomikoi [Legalization of incomes as a way of fight against the shadow economy]. Nalogovaya politika i praktika = Tax Policy and Practice, 2010, no. 6, pp. 26–33.
  12. Zubets A.N., Tarba I.V. Chislennost' srednego klassa Rossii [The number of the middle class people in Russia]. Finansy = Finance, 2013, no. 8, pp. 77–79.
  13. Smirnov V., Luk'yanchikova T. Sotsial'noe rassloenie i progressivnaya shkala nalogooblozheniya [Social stratification and progressive taxation]. Ekonomist = Economist, 2013, no. 12, pp. 33–37.
  14. Sokolov M.M. Sovremennye tendentsii v politike nalogooblozheniya fizicheskikh i yuridicheskikh lits: vzaimosvyaz' sotsial'nykh i ekonomicheskikh aspektov [Current trends in the policy of taxation of individuals and legal entities: interrelation of social and economic aspects]. Vse o nalogakh = All about Taxes, 2009, no. 4, p. 14.
  15. Ruzhanskaya L., Luk'yanov S. Osobennosti dividendnoi politiki rossiiskikh kompanii i interesov investorov [Specifics of dividend policy of Russian companies and interests of investors]. Voprosy Economiki, 2010, no. 3, pp. 132–146.
  16. Sadkov V.G., Grekov I.E. O vzaimosvyazyakh oplaty truda, monetizatsii ekonomiki i gosudarstvennogo byudzheta: neobkhodimost' reformirovaniya [On interrelations of compensation, monetization of economy and the State budget: a need for reforming]. Obshchestvo i ekonomika = Society and Economy, 2010, no. 11, pp. 136–151.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 30, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive