+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Finance and Credit
 

Risk assessment using spot volatility

Vol. 21, Iss. 24, JUNE 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Available online: 25 June 2015

Subject Heading: Financial system

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 22-26

Negomedzyanov Yu.A. Tver State University, Tver, Russian Federation
akim638@mail.ru

Negomedzyanov G.Yu. Tver State University, Tver, Russian Federation
akimzan 638@qmail.com

Importance The article mentions that financial flows in Russia are volatile. Whereas, volatility, being an important market evaluation tool, directly hinders the pace of national economic growth, it is reasonable to devise a new approach to its evaluation, especially in terms of economic significance and adaptedness to the economic crisis. Based on the analysis of methods and criteria for risk assessment and identifying the substance of spot volatility as suggested in professional literature, we determine a new risk metric and attempt to formalize it.
     Objectives To formulate scientific and methodological guidelines for shifting to the new concept of risk assessment, we tackle the following objectives on a consistent basis. We examine the existing main approaches to assessing the level of risk, review sufficiency and adequacy of risk level assessment in relation to the mean square deviation (the risk assessment concept implemented) and consider the notion of spot volatility. We suggest a new concept of the nature of changing the target market indicator against its expected value.
     Methods Drawing upon the theory of correlation functions, we formalize the nature of changing the target market indicator (a critically new approach). The research substantiates the need to apply a more sophisticated risk level assessment. Providing the theoretical substantiation of the spot volatility assessment model, we propose a comprehensive, aggregate, unbiased indicator of risk level assessment. As an example, we refer to assessments of risk associated with spot volatility of energy prices and foreign exchange rate of the Russian ruble.
     Results The research will contribute to a more thorough analysis of the market conditions and situation, identifying a more reasonable correlation between yield and spot volatility, increasing the efficiency of hedging on the basis of spot volatility.
     Conclusions and Relevance We conclude that it is possible and necessary to assess risk using spot volatility, adopt a new risk metric, i.e. CF (correlation function), and practice it.

Keywords: spot volatility, risk measure, correlation function

References:

  1. Vorob'ev S.N., Baldin K.V. Upravlenie riskami v predprinimatel'stve [Risk management in business]. Moscow, Dashkov i K Publ., 2005, 772 p.
  2. Granaturov V.M. Ekonomicheskii risk: sushchnost', metody izmereniya, puti snizheniya [Economic risk: substance, methods of assessment, mitigation methods]. Moscow, Delo i servis Publ., 2010, 208 p.
  3. Gatiatulin A.R. Usloviya i faktory primeneniya risk-menedzhmenta [Conditions and factors of risk management]. Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki = Problems of Modern Economics, 2009, no. 1, p. 27.
  4. Kabushkin S.N. Upravlenie bankovskim kreditnym riskom [Bank credit risk management]. Moscow, Novoe znanie Publ., 2007, 336 p.
  5. Kudryavtsev A.A. Integrirovannyi risk-menedzhment [Integrated risk management]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 2010, 656 p.
  6. Limitovskii M.A., Minasyan V.B. Analiz riskov investitsionnogo proekta [Investment project risk analysis]. Upravlenie finansovymi riskami = Management of Financial Risks, 2011, no. 2, pp. 132–150.
  7. Rogov M.A. Risk-menedzhment [Risk management]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 2006, 73 p.
  8. Sveshnikov A.A. Prikladnye metody teorii sluchainykh funktsii [Applied methods of the theory of stochastic functions]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1968, 449 p.
  9. Stanislavchik E. Risk-menedzhment na predpriyatii. Teoriya i praktika [Risk management in the organization. Theory and practice]. Moscow, Os'-89 Publ., 2009, 83 p.
  10. Utkin E.A. Kurs menedzhmenta [Management course]. Moscow, Zertsalo Publ., 1998, 448 p.
  11. Pickford J. Upravlenie riskami [Mastering Risk]. Moscow, Vershina Publ., 2004, 349 p.
  12. Khokhlov N.V. Upravlenie riskom [Risk management]. Moscow, YUNITI-DANA Publ., 2001, 240 p.
  13. Chernova G.V., Kudryavtsev A.A. Upravlenie riskami [Risk management]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2005, 160 p.
  14. Sholomitskii A.G. Vybor pri neopredelennosti i modelirovanie riska [The choice in uncertainty and modeling of risk]. Moscow, Higher School of Economics Publ., 2005, 121 p.
  15. Bernstein P.L. The New Religion of Risk Management. Harvard Business Review, 1996, vol. 74.
  16. Bernanke B., Gertler M. Monetary Policy and Asset Price Volatility. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review, 1999, no. 4, pp. 17–51.
  17. Johnstone-Bryden I.M. Managing Risk: How to Work Successfully with Risk. London, 1996.
  18. Meltzer S. Limits on a Company Ability to Manage Risk. Risk Management, 1997, vol. 44, no. 1.
  19. Todd W.L. An Integrated Approach to Risk Management Practices in Gold Mining Industry. Journal of Finance, 1996, vol. 51.
  20. Financial Planning: Realizing the Value of Budgeting and Forecasting. Boston, CFO Publishing LLC, 2011, 44 p.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 30, Iss. 3
March 2024

Archive