+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Finance and Credit
 

The modified Taylor Rule for the Bank of Russia based on mode switching (ending)

Vol. 21, Iss. 3, JANUARY 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Available online: 18 January 2015

Subject Heading: Banking

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 2-13

Fedorova E.A. Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
ecolena@mail.ru

Mukhin A.S. Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
mukhin.alexey@gmail.com

Dovzhenko S.E. Saint Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
serg.dovzhenko@gmail.com

The policy of central banks of different countries varies considerably and notably during economic crisis. In particular, the authors proved the impropriety of the standard Taylor Rule application for Russia during the crisis period of the Russian economy. Therefore, in this paper the authors develop the modified Taylor Rule based on switching between the modes of economic situation. On the basis of made calculations, the authors put forward an assumption that for assessing the effectiveness of the Bank of Russia monetary policy it is more expedient to use the standard Taylor Rule during the pre-crisis period from 2001 to 2008. However, on the other hand, for the crisis period from 2008 to 2011, it is better to use an alternative monetary policy rule, which includes an index of financial stress in the economy, but at the same time eliminates inflation indicator. The authors used two indices as variables of financial stress, taking into account their complexity and availability for different countries, i.e. the IMF index of financial stress and the financial stress index of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (the Kansas City FED Financial Stress Index). An important advantage of these stress indicators is the fact that they can detect small stress periods, which do not lead to full-blown crisis, and that they were not considered in the studies based on binary crisis variables. The calculations of the authors show that monetary policy is well described by the switching regimes model. For example, during the crisis, this model shows more accurate prediction than the standard Taylor Rule. The model with IMF index of financial stress is more suitable for the Russian economy. The authors' model can help to evaluate the effectiveness of each monetary policy instrument and its degree of influence during different regimes, as well as to determine what tools can specifically switch the regimes or maintain the desired regime. Estimation, analysis and timely adjustment of interest rates will lead to greater flexibility of exchange rate and will help to reduce inflation and inflationary expectations and, consequently, contribute to a smoother transition to inflation targeting.

Keywords: Taylor Rule, monetary policy, inflation targeting, model, switching, crisis indicator

References:

  1. Guriev C. Mify ekonomiki: Zabluzhdeniya i stereotipy, kotorye rasprostranyayut SMI i politiki [Myths of economics: Delusions and stereotypes disseminated by mass media and politicians]. Moscow, Al'pina Biznes Buks Publ., 2011, 294 p.
  2. Fedorova E., Bezruk O. Analiz i otsenka kanalov rasprostraneniya finansovykh krizisov na razvivayushchikhsya rynkakh [The analysis and assessment of financial crises’ distribution channels in emerging markets]. Voprosy Economiki, 2011, no. 7, pp. 120–128.
  3. Fedorova E.A., Lukasevich I.Ya. Prognozirovanie finansovykh krizisov s pomoshch'yu indikatorov: osobennosti razvivayushchikhsya stran [Forecasting financial crises by means of indicators: specifics of developing countries]. Voprosy Economiki, 2011, no. 12, pp. 35–45.
  4. Bauducco S., Bulír A., Cihák M. Taylor Rule under Financial Instability. IMF Working Paper, 2008, no. 08/18.
  5. Baxa J., Horváth R., Vasícek B. Time-Varying Monetary-Policy Rules and Financial Stress: Does Financial Instability Matter for Monetary Policy? Working Paper, 2011, no. 1. Department d’ Economia Ablicada, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona. Available at: Link.
  6. Bean C. Asset prices, financial instability, and monetary policy. American Economic Review, 2004, no. 94, pp. 14–18.
  7. Borio C., Lowe P. Asset prices, financial and monetary stability: exploring the nexus. BIS Working Paper, 2002, no. 114.
  8. Cardarelli R., Elekdad S., Lall S. Financial Stress and Economic Contractions. Journal of Financial Stability, 2011, no. 7, pp. 78–97.
  9. Castro V. Can central banks’ monetary policy be described by a linear (augmented) Taylor Rule or by a nonlinear rule? Journal of Financial Stability, 2011, no. 7, pp. 228–246.
  10. Cecchetti S., Li L. Do capital adequacy requirements matter for monetary policy? Economic Inquiry, 2008, no. 46, pp. 643–659.
  11. Chadha J.S., Sarno L., Valente G. Monetary Policy Rules, Asset Prices and Exchange Rates. IMF Staff Papers, 2004, no. 51.
  12. Coulibaly B. Monetary Policy in Emerging Market Economies: What Lessons from the Global Financial Crisis? International Finance Discussion Papers, 2012, no. 1042 (Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System). Available at: Link.
  13. Cúrdia V., Woodford M. Credit spreads and monetary policy. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2010, no. 42 (s1), pp. 3–35.
  14. Dijk D., Teräsvirta T., Franses P.H. Smooth transition autoregressive models – a survey of recent developments. Econometric Reviews, 2002, no. 21, pp. 1–47.
  15. Eijffinger S.C.W., Karatas B. Currency crises and monetary policy: A study on advanced and emerging economies. Journal of International Money and Finance, 2012, vol. 31, issue 5, pp. 948–974.
  16. Esanov A., Merkl C., Vinhas de Souza L. Monetary policy rules for Russia. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2005, no. 33, pp. 484–499.
  17. Esanov A., Merkl Ch. at al. Monetary Policy Rules for Russia. BOFIT Discussion Papers, 2004, vol. 11.
  18. Freixas X., Martin A., Skeie D. Bank Liquidity, Interbank Markets, and Monetary Policy. European Banking Center Discussion Paper, 2010, no. 2010-08S, pp. 1–48.
  19. Fuhrer J., Tootell G. Eyes on the prize: how did the Fed respond to the stock market? Journal of Monetary Economics, 2008, no. 55, pp. 796–805.
  20. Granger C.W.J., Teräsvirta T. Modelling Nonlinear Economic Relationships. Oxford University Press, 1993, Oxford.
  21. Granville B.S., Mallick S. Monetary Policy in Russia: Identifying exchange rate shocks. Economic Modelling, 2010, no. 27, pp. 432–444.
  22. Kaminsky G., Reinhart C. The Twin Crises: The Causes of Banking and Balance-of-Payments Problems. American Economic Review, 1999, vol. 89, pp. 473–500.
  23. Li F., St-Amant P. Financial Stress, Monetary Policy, and Economic Activity. Bank of Canada Working Paper, 2010, no. 10–12.
  24. Martin C., Milas C. Financial Crises and Monetary Policy: Evidence from the UK. Journal of Financial Stability, 2013, no. 9, pp. 654– 661.
  25. Rigobon R., Sack B. Measuring the reaction of monetary policy to the stock market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2003, no. 118, pp. 639–669.
  26. Siklos P., Bohl M. Asset prices as indicators of Euro area monetary policy: an empirical assessment of their role in a Taylor Rule. Open Economies Review, 2008, no. 20, pp. 39–59.
  27. Teranishi Y. Credit Spread and Monetary Policy. IMES Discussion Paper Series, Bank of Japan, 2009, no. 2009-E-14.
  28. Teräsvirta T. Specification, estimation, and evaluation of smooth transition autoregressive models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1994, no. 89, pp. 208–218.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 30, Iss. 3
March 2024

Archive