+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Finance and Credit
 

Hedging in the oil market: multidimensional models with dynamic conditional correlations

Vol. 20, Iss. 47, DECEMBER 2014

Available online: 11 December 2014

Subject Heading: Risk management

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 48-55

Neverovich O.O. National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation
o.neverovich@gmail.com

The article defines the practical value of applying multidimensional models of conditional volatility, i.e. the constant conditional correlations (CCC), dynamic conditional correlations (DCC) and asymmetric dynamic conditional correlations (A-DCC) models with regard to series of spot and futures yields in the Brent Crude oil market to calculate optimal hedge ratios. The author studied and compared the effectiveness of computational multidimensional models with dynamic conditional correlations by applying the indicator of hedge efficiency. Using multidimensional models of generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH), the author calculated optimal hedge ratios taking into account the data on a non-stationary covariation matrix for spot and future prices for oil. The AR-EGARCH model describes the price dynamics, the multidimensional GARCH models with dynamic conditional correlations describe volatility and correlation. The author estimates the optimal hedge ratios, which have been calculated based on the competing models, according to the criterion of lowering variance of portfolio and risk in comparison with a non-hedged portfolio. The obtained indicators of variance and efficiency of hedging testify to the fact that the A-DCC model has the best ability to lower a portfolio variance. The author concludes that hedge efficiency increases, if asymmetric characteristics of volatility are considered. In addition, the author proposes using a dynamic ratio of optimal hedge to build a hedging strategy in the oil market on the basis of models of conditional volatility with dynamic conditional correlations. The methodology presented in this article can be adapted to the markets of other assets.

Keywords: multidimensional, GARCH, model, conditional correlations, optimal hedge ratio, efficiency, hedging, futures, oil

References:

  1. Baillie R., Myers R. Bivariate GARCH estimation of the optimal commodity futures hedge. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1991, no. 6, pp. 109–124.
  2. Bauwens L., Sebastien L., Rombouts J.V.K. Multivariate GARCH models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2006, no. 21, pp. 79‒109.
  3. Bollerslev T. Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 1986, no. 31, pp. 307‒327.
  4. Bollerslev T. Modelling the coherence in short-run nominal exchange rates: a multivariate generalized ARCH model. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1990, no. 72, p. 498–505.
  5. Brooks C., Henry O.T., Persand G. The effect of asymmetries on optimal hedge ratios. Journal of Business, 2002, no. 75, pp. 333–352.
  6. Cappiello L., Engle R., Sheppard K. Asymmetric dynamics in the correlations of global equity and bond returns. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2006, no. 4, pp. 557–552.
  7. Chang C.-L., McAleer M., Tansuchat R. Analyzing and forecasting volatility spillovers, asymmetries and hedging in major oil markets. Energy Economics, 2010, no. 32, pp. 1445‒1455.
  8. Chang C.-L., McAleer M., Tansuchat R. Crude oil hedging strategies using dynamic multivariate GARCH. Energy Economics, 2011, no. 33, pp. 912‒923.
  9. Dickey D.A., Fuller W.A. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1979, no. 74, pp. 427‒431.
  10. Engle R. Dynamic conditional correlation: a simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 2002, no. 20, pp. 339–350.
  11. Haigh M.S., Holt M. Crack spread hedging: accounting for time-varying spillovers in the energy futures markets. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2002, no. 17, pp. 269‒289.
  12. Jarque C.M., Bera A.K. Test for normality of observations and regression residuals. International Statistical Review, 1987, no. 55, pp. 163–172.
  13. Johansen S. Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica, 1991, no. 59, pp. 1551–1580.
  14. Johnson L.L. The theory of hedging and speculation in commodity futures. The Review of Economic Studies, 1960, no. 7, pp. 139–151.
  15. Kroner K., Ng V.K. Modeling asymmetric movements of asset prices. Review of Financial Studies, 1998, no. 11, pp. 817–844.
  16. Knill A., Kristina M., Nejadmalayeri A. Selective hedging, information, asymmetry, and futures prices. Journal of Business, 2006, no. 79, pp. 1475–1501.
  17. Ku Y.-H., Chen H.-C., Chen K.-H. On the application of the dynamic conditional correlation model in the estimating optimal time-varying hedge ratios. Applied Economics Letters, 2007, no. 14, pp. 503–509.
  18. Lanza A., Manera M., McAleer M. Modeling dynamic conditional correlations in WTI oil forward and future returns. Finance Research Letters, 2006, no. 3, pp. 114‒132.
  19. McAleer M., Hoti S., Chan F. Structure and asymptotic theory for multivariate asymmetric conditional volatility. Econometric Reviews, 2009, no. 28, pp. 422–440.
  20. Regnier E. Oil and energy price volatility. Energy Economics, 2007, no. 29, pp. 405‒427.
  21. Ripple R.D., Moosa I.A. Hedging effectiveness and futures contract maturity: the case of NYMEX crude oil futures. Applied Financial Economics, 2007, no. 17, pp. 683‒689.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 30, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive