+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Finance and Credit
 

Residual income in the system of economic relations (institutional approach)

Vol. 20, Iss. 41, NOVEMBER 2014

Available online: 3 November 2014

Subject Heading: ISSUES ON ECONOMICS

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 17-24

Sukharev A.N. Tver State University, Tver, Russian Federation
su500005@yandex.ru

From the perspective of the institutional economic theory, the article presents a conceptual idea of residual income, reveals its nature, types and forms. Residual income can be official (formal) and unofficial (informal); it can be in the form of profit, gifts, bribes and kickbacks from employees (ordinary employees and managers), and so on. The author shows a mechanism of appropriating residual income within a commercial and non-commercial organization and at the State level. In commercial organizations, residual income should take a form of profit, and the owners of the organization should appropriate it, however, the opportunistic behavior of employees may lead to appropriation of the residual income of a commercial organization by the employees. In non-profit organizations, residual income should officially be a zero; however, the hidden purpose of creating such an organization may be earning residual income by owners (founders) in the forms other than profit. In this case, there is an effect of double "extraction" of residual income by owners and managers. The author considered two ideal models of the State from the perspective of generating and appropriating residual income, i.e., an exploitative State and a consensus democracy. In the exploitative State (a model of a stationary bandit, or the McGuire-Olson model), the Supreme Ruler (the stationary bandit) maximizes the residual (net) income, and in the consensus democracy such an income should be a zero. However, in both ideal types of State there arises an agent problem, when the State apparatus officially acting for account of the principal (the Supreme Ruler or the people), and at its expense actually maximizes the residual income. This situation causes a deformation of economic relations. Obtaining the right to appropriate the residual income can be a subject of a fight (a conflict), which ultimately leads to establishing a "balance" in distribution at the level of an organization or the State, which can be then violated due to the actions of individuals or groups of individuals redistributing the residual income in their favor.

Keywords: residual income, profit, rent, opportunistic behavior, appropriation, double effect, agent, principal, bandit, stationary

References:

  1. Alpatov A.A. Yuridicheskaya konstruktsiya korporatsii s trudovoi sobstvennost'yu [A legal construction of a corporation with labor ownership]. Sovremennoe pravo – Modern law, 2011, no. 8, pp. 73–80.
  2. Den'gov V.V. Teoriya nepolnykh kontraktov: firma i prava sobstvennosti [The theory of incomplete contracts: a company and property rights]. Marketing MBA. Marketingovoe upravlenie predpriyatiem – Marketing MBA. Marketing enterprise management, 2014, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 45–72.
  3. Institutsional'naya ekonomika. Novaya institutsional'naya teoriya: uchebnik [Institutional Economics. A new institutional theory: a textbook]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2006, p. 416.
  4. Lapshin S.V. Nelineinaya ekonomika predpriyatiya: zakony otdachi resursov i reduktsii truda [Non-linear enterprise economy: the laws of resource pay-off and labor reduction)]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  5. Levin S.N., Sokolova A.A. Gosudarstvo s preobladaniem kontraktnykh nachal: metodologiya analiza i problemy ego formirovaniya v Rossii [A State with dominating contractual framework: the methodology of analysis and the problems of its formation in Russia]. Upravlenie megapolisom – Managing a metropolis, 2008, no. 2, pp. 19–44.
  6. Lushin S.V. Prikladnye metody matematicheskogo modelirovaniya finansovo-khozyaistvennoi deyatel'nosti predpriyatiya (optimizatsiya ostatochnoi pribyli, ostatochnogo dokhoda predpriyatiya, denezhnykh dokhodov rabotnikov) [Applied methods of mathematical modeling financial and economic activity of an enterprise (optimization of residual income, residual income of an enterprise, and cash income of employees)]. Imushchestvennye otnosheniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii – Property relationships in Russian Federation, 2004, no. 1, pp. 93–105.
  7. Matyash I.V. Ostatochnyi dokhod, SMVA: finansovyi rychag sistemnogo effekta i skrytye poteri kapitala [Residual income, SMVA: a financial leverage of system effect and hidden capital losses]. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya – Financial analytics: science and experience, 2011, no. 31, pp. 2–12.
  8. Matyash I.V. Teorii ekonomicheskoi pribyli: metod diskontirovaniya v otsenke sistemnogo effekta integrirovannykh struktur [The theory of economic profit: a method of discounting in assessing the system effect of integrated structures]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika – Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2012, no. 15, pp. 27–39.
  9. Rikardo D. Nachala politicheskoi ekonomii i nalogovogo oblozheniya [On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation]. Moscow, Politicheskaya literatura Publ., 1955, vol. 1, 360 p.
  10. Surtseva A.A. Ostatochnyi dokhod gosudarstva kak ekonomicheskii kriterii kontraktnogo gosudarstva [Residual income of the State as an economic criterion of a contractual State]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  11. Surtseva A.A. Raspredelenie ostatochnogo dokhoda gosudarstva v Rossii kak kriterii ego kontraktnosti [Distributing residual income of the State in Russia as a criterion of its contractual nature]. V mire nauchnykh otkrytii – In world of scientific discoveries, 2011, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 292–298.
  12. Sukharev A.N. O gosudarstvennykh sberezheniyakh federal'nogo byudzheta [On State savings of the Federal budget]. Finansy – Finance, 2009, no. 11, pp. 18–22.
  13. Sukharev A.N. Ot politiki gosudarstvennogo dolga k politike gosudarstvennykh sberezhenii [From the policy of State debt to the policy of State savings]. Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki – Problems of modern economics, 2009, no. 4, pp. 70–73.
  14. Sukharev A.N. Prirodnaya renta kak instrument finansovoi politiki stabilizatsii rossiiskoi ekonomiki [Natural resource rent as an instrument of the fiscal policy of the Russian economy stabilization]. Finansy i kredit – Finance and credit, 2010, no. 15, pp. 40–46.
  15. Sukharev A.N. Suverennye fondy blagosostoyaniya: mezhdunarodnyi i rossiiskii opyt [Sovereign wealth funds: international and Russian experience]. Finansy i kredit – Finance and credit, 2010, no. 17, pp. 31–37.
  16. Sukharev A.N. Finansovaya ustoichivost' i platezhesposobnost' gosudarstva [Financial stability and solvency of the State]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika – Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2010, no. 31, pp. 8–15.
  17. Alchian A., Demsets H. Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization. American Economic Review, 1972, no. 62, pp. 777–795.
  18. Biddle G.C., Chen P., Zhang G. When Capital Follows Profitability: Non-Linear Residual Income Dynamics. Review of Accounting Studies, 2001, vol. 6, no. 2–3, pp. 229–265.
  19. O'Hanlon J., Peasnell K. Residual Income and Value-Creation: The Missing Link. Review of Accounting Studies, 2002, vol. 7, no. 2–3, pp. 229–245.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 30, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive