+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Finance and Credit
 

Is there an optimal capital structure in famous "theory of compromise"?

Vol. 19, Iss. 30, AUGUST 2013

Available online: 19 August 2013

Subject Heading: CAPITAL THEORY

JEL Classification: 

Brusov P.N. Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Professor, the Department of Applied Mathematics, the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
pnb1983@yahoo.com

Filatova T.V. PhD in Economics, Professor, the Department of Financial Management, the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
mfilatova@fa.ru

Orekhova N.P. PhD of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Head of the Department of Financial and Economic Technologies, the Institute of Management, Business and Law, Rostov-on-Don
Natali_Orehova@Bk.Ru

In the article within the framework of the modern theory of cost and structure of the capital of the company of Brusova–Filatovoy–Orekhovoy the analysis of widely known theory of a compromise (trade off theory) is carried out. It is noted that the assumption of risk-taking of loan financing (and the corresponding growth of a rate on the credit at bankruptcy threat) contrary to expectations doesn't lead to growth of the average cost of the capital of WACC which continues to decrease with leverage. It means lack of a minimum in dependence on the average cost of the capital of WACC on leverage and a maximum in dependence of capitalization of the company on leverage. The conclusion is drawn that in the well-known theory of a compromise the optimum structure of the capital is absent. The explanation for this fact is offered.

Keywords: compromise theory, loan financing, capital cost, optimum structure of capital, leverage, Modigliani–Miller's theory, Brusova–Filatovoy–Orekhovoy theory

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8709 (Online)
ISSN 2071-4688 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 30, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive