Subject. Level and method of Russia's integration into the world economy. Objective of the work. To determine the level and method of Russia's integration into the world economy. Methodology of the work. The research methodology is based on the use of general scientific methods, primarily on the analysis and synthesis of data, and special economic and mathematical methods, in particular, correlation and regression analysis and graphical methods. Results of the work. The study revealed a number of provisions indicating the level of Russia's integration into the world economy: fourth place in the world in terms of purchasing power parity; growth of international reserves; in certain periods, foreign direct investment in the country grew faster than other investments. The work found that the main way of integration into the world economy is a positive balance of trade due to oil and gas exports. However, the current account balance is less significant than the trade balance due to interest payments on foreign loans, the implementation of a strategy for making a profit in the foreign exchange market, due to the difference in interest rates. A reduction in debt to non-residents on sovereign securities is shown. The country's public external debt began to fluctuate at a higher level, but within a narrowed range of values, and the volume of federal loan bonds owned by non-residents decreased with a significant increase in their volume. The Russian budget is replenished by contributions from transactions on the sale of local assets of residents of foreign countries. Conclusions. The identified level and method of Russia's integration into the global economy are informative for both Russian and foreign investors, generally indicating the boundaries of investment benchmarks.
Keywords: investment, integration, bonds, current account, trade balance
References:
Wang Z., Sibt-e-Ali M. Financial globalization and economic growth amid geopolitical risk: A study on China-Russia far East federal district. Heliyon, 2024, vol. 10, iss. 10., p. e31098 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31098 EDN: TJYQHA
Adebayo T.S., Ullah S., Kartal M.T., Ali K., Pata U.K., Aga M. Endorsing sustainable development in BRICS: The role of technological innovation, renewable energy consumption, and natural resources in limiting carbon emission. Science of The Total Environment, 2023, vol. 859, Part 1., p. 160181. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160181 EDN: YXAPWT
Chu L.K., Dogan B., Abakah E.J.A., Ghosh S., Albeni M. Impact of economic policy uncertainty, geopolitical risk, and economic complexity on carbon emissions and ecological footprint: an investigation of the E7 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, vol. 30, iss. 12, pp. 34406–34427. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-24682-2 EDN: MDBZNN
Wang K.H., Kan, J.M., Jiang C.F., Su C.W. Is Geopolitical Risk Powerful Enough to Affect Carbon Dioxide Emissions? Evidence from China. Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 7867. DOI: 10.3390/su14137867 EDN: GAOQJA
Ding T., Li H., Tan R., Zhao X. How does geopolitical risk affect carbon emissions? An empirical study from the perspective of mineral resources extraction in OECD countries. Resources Policy, 2023, vol. 85, Part B, p. 103983. DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103983 EDN: NKXMHD
Li F, Yang C, Li Z, Failler P. Does Geopolitics Have an Impact on Energy Trade? Empirical Research on Emerging Countries. Sustainability, 2021; vol. 13, iss. 9, p. 5199. DOI: 10.3390/su13095199 EDN: JRDKCM
Liu Y., Yu L., Yang C., Li Z. Heterogeneity of the impact of geopolitical events on energy trade: an empirical study based on Regression Discontinuity Design. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2021, vol. 9, p. 722910. DOI: 10.3389/FENVS.2021.722910 EDN: PMWTQA
Sun M., Cao X., Liu X., Cao T., Zhu Q. The Russia-Ukraine conflict, soaring international energy prices, and implications for global economic policies. Heliyon, 2024, vol. 10, iss. 16, p. e34712. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34712 EDN: RJIRWS
Mbah R.E., Wasum D.F. Russian-Ukraine 2022 War: a review of the economic impact of Russian-Ukraine crisis on the USA, UK, Canada, and Europe. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 2022, vol. 9, iss. 3, pp. 144–153. DOI: 10.14738/assrj.93.12005 EDN: LYSVRH
Kubin T. Russia, Ukraine, and the West: Are Smart Economic Sanctions Effective? The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review, 2023, vol. 50, iss. 3, pp. 310–343. DOI: 10.30965/18763324-bja10082 EDN: BYHYDI
Gong Y. Economic Consequences in Europe of the Russian-Ukraine 2022 War. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 2023, vol. 4, pp. 260–270. DOI: 10.54254/2754-1169/4/20221073 EDN: ZVMLFY
Khachaturyan M.V., Klicheva E.V. Implementing the sharing economy in the context of achieving sustainable economic development in Russia. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2025, vol. 10, iss. 2, 100655. DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2025.100655 EDN: VYWBQK
Fedyunina A.A., Gorodnyi N.A., Simachev Y.V. How the adoption of industry 4.0 technologies is related to participation in global and domestic value chains: Evidence from Russia. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2024, vol. 8, iss. 2, pp. 93–108. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijis.2024.01.002 EDN: JMYNPC
Timmer M.P., Los B., Stehrer R., de Vries G.J. Supply chain fragmentation and the global trade elasticity: A new accounting framework. IMF Economic Review, 2021, vol. 69, iss. 4, pp. 656–680. DOI: 10.1057/s41308-021-00139-3 EDN: EGOGXE
Constantinescu C., Mattoo A., Ruta M. Does vertical specialisation increase productivity? The World Economy, 2019, vol. 42, iss. 8, pp. 2385–2402. DOI: 10.1111/twec.12801
Fratocchi L., Ancarani A., Barbieri P., Mauro C.D., Nassimbeni G., Sartor M., Matteo V., Zanoni A. Motivations of manufacturing reshoring: an interpretative framework. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 2016, vol. 46, iss. 2, pp. 98–127. DOI: 10.1108/IJPDLM-06-2014-0131
Azmeh S., Nguyen H., Kuhn M. Automation and industrialisation through global value chains: North Africa in the German automotive wiring harness industry. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2022, vol. 63, pp. 125–138. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2022.09.006 EDN: AARWGK
Dalenogare L.S., Benitez G.B., Ayala N.F., Frank A.G. The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 2018, vol. 204, pp. 383–394. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.019 EDN: YKSAAP
Hallward-Driemeier M., Nayyar G. Trouble in the Making? The Future of Manufacturing-Led Development. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. The World Bank, 2017, 255 p. Link DOI:10.1596/978-1-4648-1174-6
Gershman M.A., Dranev Yu.Ya, Klypin A.V., Ochirova E.S., Semin A.A. [National goal in science: assessment of retrospective and predictive dynamics]. Problemy prognozirovaniya, 2025, iss. 2(209), pp. 118-134. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.47711/0868-6351-209-118-134. EDN: FBGWZR.
