+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»






Digest Finance

Criteria of Recognition of Transactions as Sham and Feigned: Accounting, Auditing, and Legal Approaches

Vol. 26, Iss. 3, SEPTEMBER 2021

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 14 August 2018

Received in revised form: 30 August 2018

Accepted: 4 September 2018

Available online: 30 September 2021


JEL Classification: К12, М41

Pages: 332–349


Tat'yana M. ALDAROVA East Siberia State University of Technology and Management, Ulan-Ude, Republic of Buryatia, Russian Federation aldarova_t@inbox.ru
not available

Subject. This article studies fictitious and simulated transactions from the law, accounting and auditing points of view.
Objectives. The article aims to describe the legal, accounting and auditing approaches to the consideration of null and void deals by identifying and classifying the criteria for the recognition of such deals as the sham and feigned ones.
Methods. For the study, I used the methods of comparative analysis, systematization, and generalization.
Results. The article presents the argument that from the legal point of view, imaginary and simulated transactions should be referred to the flaw-in-the-will transactions. Accounting and auditing approaches imply their attribution to the defect-of-a-substance transactions. If the balance between the form and the content of business operation items arising from the essence of such transactions is not observed, the recognition of them as imaginary and feigned is the object of professional judgment of the accountant (auditor).
Conclusions and Relevance. The article concludes that the legal approach is focused on the identification of imaginary and feigned transactions, the form of which is not required by law. Accountants and auditors should assess the content of such transactions. They are not obliged to classify dubious transactions as imaginary and legally feigned. The results of the research can be applied in the preparation of scientific and educational publications on the theory and practice of accounting and auditing in terms of principles and methodology of accounting and auditing.

Keywords: imaginary deal, fraudulent transaction, accounting, auditing, approach


  1. Velento I.I. [On the problem of invalidity of transactions]. Vestnik obrazovatel'nogo konsortsiuma Srednerusskii universitet. Seriya: Yurisprudentsiya, 2015, no. 6, pp. 7–14. (In Russ.)
  2. Batova O.V., Karagodin A.V., Kozyar N.V., Plokhikh A.N. [The conditions for differentiating fictional and false agreements from other types of void transactions]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 2015, no. 2-2, p. 712. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  3. Kheifets F.S. Nedeistvitel'nost' sdelok po rossiiskomu grazhdanskomu pravu: monografiya. Yuridicheskii praktikum [Invalidity of transactions under the Russian civil law: a monograph. Legal workshop]. Moscow, Yurait Publ., 1999, 164 p.
  4. Kagal'nitskova N.V. [Simulated and sham transactions in the reformed civil code of the Russian Federation]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 5: Yurisprudentsiya = Legal Concept, 2015, no. 2, pp. 96–100. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  5. Kagal'nitskova N.V. [The theoretical and legal problems of the distinction between void and voidable transactions in civil law]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 5: Yurisprudentsiya = Legal Concept, 2015, no. 1, pp. 104–109. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  6. Bolotina M.S. [On the issue of invalidity of fictional and false transactions]. Akademicheskii vestnik = Academic Bulletin, 2009, no. 2, pp. 17–21. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  7. Rabinovich N.V. Nedeistvitel'nost' sdelok i ee posledstviya [Invalidity of transactions and its consequences]. Leningrad, Leningrad University Publ., 1960, 171 p.
  8. Meier D.I. O yuridicheskikh vymyslakh i predpolozheniyakh, o skrytnykh i pritvornykh deistviyakh [On legal inventions and assumptions, on covert and feigned actions]. Kazan, 1854, 127 p.
  9. Matveev I.V. Pravovaya priroda nedeistvitel'nykh sdelok [The legal nature of invalid transactions]. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2002, 176 p.
  10. Ioffe O.S. Sovetskoe grazhdanskoe pravo [Soviet civil law]. Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ., 1967, 494 p.
  11. Murtazalieva S.M. [Invalidity of fictional and false transactions]. Vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Obshchestvennye nauki = Bulletin of Dagestan State University. Series 3: Social Sciences, 2008, no. 2, pp. 117–120. (In Russ.)
  12. Moiseev M.V. [The fictional and false transactions]. Aktual'nye voprosy bukhgalterskogo ucheta i nalogooblozheniya, 2010, no. 17.
  13. Andreev V.K. [Transaction and invalidity thereof]. Yurist = Jurist, 2014, no. 1, pp. 8–12. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  14. Pyatov M.L. [The principle of priority of content over form and its impact on accounting practice in Russia]. Bukhuchet v sel'skom khozyaistve = The Journal of Accounting in Agriculture, 2008, no. 5, pp. 53–58. (In Russ.)
  15. Sokolov Ya.V., Bychkova S.M. [About the priority of the content over the form: accounting problems]. Bukhgalterskii uchet = Accounting, 2000, no. 1, pp. 72–75.
  16. Akat'eva M.D. [Principles of accounting: A retrospective evaluation of its formation and improvement]. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting, 2018, vol. 21, iss. 4, pp. 441–451. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  17. Kozmenkova S.V., Krupinova E.S. [Accounting principles for microenterprises: Composition and content]. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting, 2017, vol. 20, iss. 8, pp. 460–476. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  18. Lugovskoi D.V., Olomskaya E.V., Molodtsova Yu.N. [Priority of economic content over legal form]. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting, 2007, vol. 10, iss. 5, pp. 31–37. (In Russ.)
  19. Sokolov Ya.V., Bychkova S.M. [Accounting as a method of conceptual reconstruction of economic processes]. Bukhgalterskii uchet = Accounting, 2003, no. 15, pp. 62–67. (In Russ.)
  20. Aldarova T.M., Nikiforova V.V. [The impact of Materiality and Reliability categories on accountant's professional judgment formation]. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting, 2017, vol. 20, iss. 12, pp. 672–685. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  21. Guttsait E.M. [Professional judgment of the auditor and the method of expert evaluations]. Audit, 2015, no. 10-11, pp. 23–29. URL: Link (In Russ.).

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-9438 (Online)
ISSN 2073-8005 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 27, Iss. 2
June 2022