+7 495 989 9610, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»






Digest Finance

Quantitative parameters of anti-money laundering regulation

Vol. 25, Iss. 4, DECEMBER 2020

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 3 August 2020

Received in revised form: 21 September 2020

Accepted: 5 October 2020

Available online: 25 December 2020


JEL Classification: Е26, F38, G28

Pages: 416–429


Tanyushcheva N.Yu. Astrakhan State University (ASU), Astrakhan, Russian Federation


Subject. As financial institutions carry out a huge number of transactions, the financial sector definitely needs to automate some control procedures, including anti-money laundering ones. The effectiveness of automated control measures directly depends on how adequately tasks for the software are written. The article examines the impact of macroeconomic indicators, such as GDP per capita, average wage, and the scale of the shadow economy in the G20 countries and in two of the CIS countries (Belarus and Tajikistan) on thresholds of the fixed limit of transaction (FLT), which is regulated with the anti-money laundering legislation, including the fixed limit of cash transaction (FLCT).
Objectives. I investigate approaches to setting FLT (FLCT) in different countries and formulate my opinion on this issue.
Methods. The methodological basis of the study was made up of empirical and logical constructions, statistical analysis, synthesis, systems approach.
Results. I identified why FLT (FLCT) are denied. This happens due to lawmakers' confidence in the effectively controlled financial sector, or the corruption pressure. The countries with FLT (FLCT) introduce and use them formally. The article presents the risk-based approach to measuring the FLCT based on the macroeconomic indicators (average annual wages, savings per capita).
Conclusions and Relevance. The case of Russia shows that the inflation undermines the barrier function of FLT (FLCT), while the analytical division of financial intelligence has to handle more issues. The proposed approach will help reduce costs the financial system incurs to process financial information in order to counter money laundering.

Keywords: financial digitization, money laundering, AML, fixed limit of transaction (FLT), fixed limit of cash transaction (FLCT), G-20


  1. Becker G. Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy, 1968, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 169–217. Stable URL: Link
  2. Velthoven B.V., Wijck P.V. Becker’s Theory on Crime and Punishment, a Useful Guide for Law Enforcement Policy in the Netherlands? Recht der Werkelijkheid, 2016, no. 1, pp. 6–31.
  3. Ehrlich I. Participation in Illegitimate Activities: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation. Journal of Political Economy, 1973, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 521–565. Stable URL: Link
  4. Reynolds M.O. The Economics of Criminal Activity. Introductory Economic. Series Module 12. Andover, MA, Warner Modular Publications, 1973, pp. 1–27.
  5. Orsagh T., Witte D. Economic Status and Crime: Implications for Offender Rehabilitation. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1981, vol. 72, iss. 3, pp. 1055–1071. URL: Link
  6. Gutmann P. The Subterranean Economy. Financial Analysts Journal, 1977, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 26–27. Stable URL: Link
  7. Feige E. How Big is the Irregular Economy? Challenge, 1979, vol. 22, iss. 5, pp. 5–13. URL: Link
  8. Tanzi V. The Underground Economy in the United States: Annual Estimate, 1930–80. Staff Papers (International Monetary Fund), 1983, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 283–305. URL: Link
  9. Tanzi V. Macroeconomic Implications of Money Laundering. In: Responding to Money Laundering, International Perspectives. Amsterdam, Harwood Academic Publishers, 1997, pp. 91–104.
  10. Karataev M.V. [Modern trends in criminal proceeds laundering and the Russian specifics]. Bankovskoe delo = Banking, 2011, no. 4, pp. 79–85. (In Russ.)
  11. Davydov V.S., Gilinskii Ya.I. [Legalization (laundering) of criminal proceeds: Distinctions as part of organized crime, terrorism and corruption]. Sledovatel' = Investigator, 2008, no. 3, pp. 23–29. (In Russ.)
  12. Ionov V.M. [Place and role of cash in global economy: Will cash disappear?]. Den'gi i kredit = Money and Credit, 2016, no. 10, pp. 43–50. (In Russ.)
  13. Khiaonarong T., Humphrey D. Cash Use Across Countries and the Demand for Central Bank Digital Currency. IMF Working Paper, 2019, WP/19/46. URL: Link
  14. Ardizzi G., Petraglia C., Piacenza M., Schneider F., Turati G. Money Laundering as a Crime in the Financial Sector: A New Approach to Quantitative Assessment, with an Application to Italy. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2014, vol. 46, iss. 8, pp. 1555–1590. URL: Link
  15. Serga L.K. [On the approach to the definition of the threshold values in the solution of classification]. Vestnik NGUEU = Vestnik NSUEM, 2012, no. 1, pp. 54–60. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  16. Glinskii V.V., Serga L.K. [Nonstable aggregates: Conceptual foundation of statistical study methodology]. Vestnik NGUEU = Vestnik NSUEM, 2009, no. 2, pp. 137–142. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  17. Kanao K., Hamori S. The Size of the Underground Economy in Japan. Economics Bulletin, 2010, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 893–902.

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-9438 (Online)
ISSN 2073-8005 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 25, Iss. 4
December 2020