+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»






Digest Finance

Authority of the Central Bank of Russia from Perspectives of Keynes's Liquidity Preference Theory

Vol. 23, Iss. 4, DECEMBER 2018

Received: 1 June 2018

Received in revised form: 15 June 2018

Accepted: 29 June 2018

Available online: 24 December 2018


JEL Classification: F31, F41, L52

Pages: 433–440


Gogokhiya D.Sh. Institute of Economics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation

ORCID id: not available

Subject The article discusses and substantiates the authority of the Central Bank of Russia and points out drawbacks of such rationale.
Objectives The research provides the rationale for expanding the authority of the Central Bank of Russia not only as a creditor, but also as a borrower of last resort.
Methods The research involves the historical-logic and functional methods, methods of comparative economic analysis.
Results I found aspects to separate the demand for money as a means of savings and means of payment for productive resources and other capital assets. The article demonstrates that Keynes's liquidity preference theory, as put in The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, highlights the main guidelines for such aspects and ways to improve the existing monetary system as a central banking mechanism with fractional reserve of deposits.
Conclusions and Relevance As a result of the analysis, I identify specifics in the demand and supply in the monetary market and potential opportunities of the Central Bank of Russia to maintain the policy of differentiated interest rates and subsequently ensure the safety of monetary assets. The banking community has to admit that specific banking risks associated with the identification of rather reliable borrowers cannot be transferred to other financial institutions without affecting the quality of such risks management. The findings can be used to discuss and choose options of the monetary policy.

Keywords: money demand, money supply, central bank, liquidity, maintenance costs


  1. Keynes J.M. Obshchaya teoriya zanyatosti, protsenta i deneg [The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 1993, 543 p.
  2. Hicks J.R. Stoimost' i kapital [Value and Capital]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1993, 191 p.
  3. Hicks J.R. Teoriya ekonomicheskoi istorii [A Theory of Economic History]. Moscow, NP Zhurnal Voprosy Ekonomiki Publ., 2006, 224 p.
  4. Smith A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov [An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2016, 1056 p.
  5. Vymyatnina Yu. Teoriya deneg. Uroki krizisa [Money theory. Crisis lessons]. St. Petersburg, EUSP Press Publ., 2013, 272 p.
  6. Trunin P., Vashchelyuk N. [The analysis of money supply endogeneity in Russia]. Zhurnal Novoi Ekonomicheskoi Assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association, 2015, no. 1, pp. 103–131. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  7. Schumpeter J.A. Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung]. Moscow, Direktmedia Pablishing Publ., 2008, 401 p.
  8. Weber M. Protestantskaya etika i dukh kapitalizma [Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus]. Moscow, East View Publ., 2002, 352 p.
  9. Ferguson N.C.D. Voskhozhdenie deneg [The Ascent of Money]. Moscow, Corpus Publ., 2015, 448 p.
  10. De Cecco M. Zolotoi standart. New Palgrave. Ekonomicheskaya teoriya [The Gold Standard. In: The New Palgrave: The World of Economics]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2004, pp. 394–412.

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-9438 (Online)
ISSN 2073-8005 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 29, Iss. 1
March 2024