+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»






Digest Finance

Contemporary indirect methods for measuring the non-observed economy: A brief overview

Vol. 21, Iss. 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 23 May 2016

Received in revised form: 3 June 2016

Accepted: 14 June 2016

Available online: 19 September 2016


JEL Classification: С10, O17

Pages: 38-48

Simutina N.L. Far Eastern State Agrarian University, Blagoveshchensk, Amur Oblast, Russian Federation

Leventov N.N. Far Eastern State Agrarian University, Blagoveshchensk, Amur Oblast, Russian Federation

Importance The article overviews methods for measuring non-observed economy.
Objectives The research summarizes foreign practices and expertise to measure non-observed economy using indirect methods, determines whether they are applicable for the above purposes in the Russian regions.
Methods We used deduction, induction, comparative and logic analysis.
Results The research generally and briefly classifies methods to measure non-observed economy. Drawing upon foreign authors' researches, we performed a comparative and critical analysis of three methods, which are most frequently used abroad. We described their main principles, found their strengths and weaknesses. The article outlines the main areas for further researches into non-observed economy measurement.
Conclusions and Relevance We classified indirect methods that had been most frequently used for the recent decade to measure non-observed economy, indicated their strengths, weaknesses and specifics. The article presents a comparative analysis of two methods in a more detailed way. The main conclusions of the article may prove useful for scientific and teaching purposes, activities of tax and statistical bodies, when assessing how certain factors influence the scale of non-observed economy, and formulating governmental measures to curb non-observed economy.

Keywords: non-observed economy, indirect method, non-observed economy measurement, non-observed economy drivers, statistical modeling methods


  1. Cowell F.A. Cheating the Government: The Economics of Evasion. London, Cambridge, MIT Press, 1990, 267 p.
  2. Schneider F., Enste D.H. Shadow Economies: Size, Causes, and Consequences. Journal of Economic Literature, 2000, vol. 38, iss. 1, pp. 77–114. doi: 10.1257/jel.38.1.77
  3. Schneider F. Shadow Economies around the World: What Do We Really Know? European Journal of Political Economy, 2005, vol. 21, pp. 598–642. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2004.10.002
  4. Schneider F. The Shadow Economy and Work in the Shadow: What Do We (Not) Know? IZA Discussion Paper, 2012, no. 6423, 73 p.
  5. OECD. Measuring the Non-Observed Economy: A Handbook. Paris, OECD Publications, 2002, 250 p.
  6. TNS Opinion & Social. Undeclared Work in the European Union. Special Eurobarometer 284-Wave EB67.3. Brussels, European Commission, 2007, 138 p.
  7. TNS Opinion & Social. Undeclared Work in the European Union. Special Eurobarometer 402-Wave EB79.2. Brussels, European Commission, 2014, 207 p.
  8. Pedersen S. The Shadow Economy in Germany, Great Britain and Scandinavia: A Measurement Based on Questionnaire Service. The Rockwool Foundation Research Unit. Copenhagen, 2003, Study no. 10, 177 p.
  9. Andrews D., Sánchez A.C., Johansson A. Towards a Better Understanding of the Informal Economy. OECD Economics Department, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2011, Working Papers, no. 873, 45 p.
  10. Kaufmann D., Kaliberda A. Integrating the Unofficial Economy into the Dynamics of Post Socialist Economies: A framework of analyses and evidence. In: B. Kaminski (ed.) Economic Transition in Russia and the New States of Eurasia. London, M.E. Sharpe, 1996, pp. 81–120.
  11. Weitzman M.L. Comments and Discussion, pp. 230–235. In: Johnson et al. The Unofficial Economy in Transition. Brookings Papers in Economic Activity, 1997, vol. 2, pp. 159–239. doi: 10.2307/2534688
  12. Tobler W. Satellite Confirmation of Settlement Size Coefficients. Area, 1969, vol. 1, pp. 30–34.
  13. Ghosh T., Anderson S., Powell R.L., Sutton P.C., Elvidge C.D. Estimation of Mexico's Informal Economy and Remittances Using Nighttime Imagery. Remote Sensing, 2009, vol. 1, pp. 418–444. doi: 10.3390/rs1030418
  14. Sutton P.C., Roberts D., Elvidge C.D., Baugh K. Census from Heaven: An Estimate of Global Human Population Using Nighttime Satellite Imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2001, vol. 22, pp. 3061–3076. doi: 10.1080/01431160010007015
  15. Sutton P.C., Elvidge C.D., Obremski T. Building and Evaluating Models to Estimate Ambient Population Density. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 2003, vol. 69, pp. 545–552. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00078-6
  16. Lo C.P. Urban Indicators of China from Radiance Calibrated Digital DMSP-OLS Nighttime Images. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2002, vol. 92, pp. 225–240. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.00288
  17. Sutton P.C., Costanza R. Global Estimates of Market and Non-market Values Derived from Nighttime Satellite Imagery, Land Cover, and Ecosystem Service Evaluation. Ecological Economics, 2002, vol. 41, pp. 509–527. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00097-6
  18. Zelner A. Estimation of Regression Relationships Containing Unobservable Variables. International Economic Review, 1970, vol. 11, iss. 3, pp. 441–454. doi: 10.1016/S1573-4412(84)02015-8
  19. Goldberger A.S. Structural Equation Methods in the Social Sciences. Econometrica, 1972, vol. 40, iss. 6, pp. 979–1001. doi: 10.2307/191385
  20. Frey B.S., Weck-Hannemann H. The Hidden Economy as an “Unobserved” Variable. European Economic Review, 1984, vol. 26, iss. 1, pp. 33–53. doi: 10.1016/0014-2921(84)90020-5
  21. Aigner D., Schneider F., Ghosh D. Me and My Shadow: Estimating the size of the US hidden economy from time series data. In: W.A. Barnett, E.R. Berndt and H. White (eds): Dynamic Econometric Modeling. Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 224–243. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511664342.015
  22. Giles D.E.A. Modelling the Hidden Economy in the Tax-Gap in New Zealand. Empirical Economics, 1999, vol. 24, iss. 4, pp. 621–640. doi: 10.1080/758532593
  23. Giles D.E.A., Tedds L.M. Taxes and the Canadian Underground Economy. Toronto, Canadian Tax Foundation, 2002, 270 p.
  24. Buehn A., Schneider F. Shadow Economies around the World: Novel insights, accepted knowledge, and new estimates. International Tax Public Finance, 2012, vol. 19, pp. 139–171. doi: 0.1007/s10797-011-9187-7
  25. Helberger C., Knepel H. How Big is the Shadow Economy?: A re-analysis of the unobserved-variable approach of B.S. Frey and H. Weck-Hannemann. European Economic Review, 1988, vol. 32, iss. 4, pp. 965–976. doi: 10.1016/0014-2921(88)90055-4
  26. Smith R.S. The Underground Economy: Guidance for Policy Makers. Canadian Tax Journal, 2002, vol. 50, iss. 5, pp. 1655–1661.
  27. Hill R. The Underground Economy in Canada: Boom or Bust? Canadian Tax Journal, 2002, vol. 50, iss. 5, pp. 1641–1654.
  28. Breusch T. The Canadian Underground Economy: An examination of Giles and Tedds. Canadian Tax Journal, 2005, vol. 53, iss. 2, pp. 367–391.
  29. Busato F., Chiarini B. Market and Underground Activities in a Two Sector Dynamic Equilibrium Model. Economic Theory, 2004, vol. 24, iss. 3, pp. 831–861. doi: 10.3917/reco.605.1155
  30. Elgin C., Oztunali O. Shadow Economies around the World: Model Based Estimates. Bogazici University Working Papers, 2012, vol. 5, 48 p. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00022-8
  31. Ihrig J., Moe K. Lurking in the Shadows: The informal sector and government policy. Journal of Development Economics, 2004, vol. 73, pp. 541–577. doi: 10.1007/s10797-011-9183-y
  32. Elgin C., Schneider F. Shadow Economies in OECD Countries: DGE vs. MIMIC Approaches. Working Papers from Bogazici University, Department of Economics, 2013, vol. 13, 30 p.

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-9438 (Online)
ISSN 2073-8005 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 28, Iss. 3
September 2023