+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Digest Finance
 

Analyzing the rationale for and return on business restructuring through spin-offs

Vol. 21, Iss. 1, MARCH 2016

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 14 August 2015

Accepted: 1 September 2015

Available online: 18 March 2016

Subject Heading: INNOVATION AND INVESTMENT

JEL Classification: G14, G15, G32, G34

Pages: 47-62

Kovrigin I.Yu. ZAO VTB Capital, Moscow, Russian Federation
kovrigor@mail.ru

Importance Considering crisis phenomena in the global economy, large business restructuring becomes more relevant for holding structures. Entities take into account the existing circumstances to choose a restructuring method, thereby determining the future return on such a deal for the shareholders.
     Objectives This research examines the most substantial reasons for spin-offs and analyzes the efficiency of this restructuring strategy.
     Methods The research reviews both theoretical and practical studies of economists into corporate deals and restructuring. It identifies the most significant premises of shareholders for restructuring as spin-off, provides empirical examples of excess returns within various time periods.
     Results The findings evidence the excess return on shares of the company that approached to spinning off as a restructuring option. The return for investors on spin-offs, on average, exceeds the return gained as a result of other restructuring scenarios.
     Conclusions and Relevance Shareholders, more often than not, resort to spinning-off to derive agency benefits, i.e. looking to create additional economic motivation for managers and reduce other agency costs. Spinning-off often allows to extract hidden value for shareholders within the medium term. It is important to understand the rationale for, and return on spin-offs in order to articulate incentive strategies for top managers in large corporations and diversified holding structures.

Keywords: mergers and acquisitions, value creation, publicly traded companies, above-the-market returns, stock market

References:

  1. Slovin M., Sushka M., Ferraro S. A comparison of the Information Conveyed by Equity Carve-outs, Spin‑offs and Sell-offs. Journal of Financial Economics, 1995, vol. 37, iss. 1, pp. 89–104.
  2. Schipper K., Smith A. Effects of Recontracting on Shareholder Wealth: The Case of Voluntary Spin-offs. Journal of Financial Economics, 1983, vol. 12, iss. 4, pp. 437–467.
  3. Hite G., Owers J. Security Price Reaction around Corporate Spin-off Announcements. Journal of Financial Economics, 1983, vol. 12, iss. 4, pp. 409–436.
  4. Miles J., Rosenfeld J. The Effect of Voluntary Spin-off Announcements on Shareholder Wealth. The Journal of Finance, 1983, vol. 38, iss. 5, pp. 1597–1606.
  5. Veld C., Veld-Merkoulova Yu.V. Do Spin-offs Really Create Value? The European Case. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2004, vol. 28, iss. 5, pp. 1111–1135.
  6. Woo C., Daellenbach U.S., Willard G. Spin-off Performance: A Case of Overstated Expectations. Strategic Management Journal, 1992, vol. 13, iss. 6, pp. 433–447.
  7. Krishnaswami S., Subramaniam V. Information Asymmetry, Valuation and the Corporate Spin-off Decision. Journal of Financial Economics, 1999, vol. 53, pp. 73–112.
  8. Vijh A.M. The Spin-off and Merger Ex-Date Effects. The Journal of Finance, 1994, vol. 49, iss. 2, pp. 581–609.
  9. Desai H., Jain P.C. Firm Performance and Focus: Long-run Stock Market Performance Following Spinoffs. Journal of Financial Economics, 1999, vol. 54, iss. 1, pp. 75–101.
  10. Daley L., Mehrotra V., Sivakumar R. Corporate Focus and Value Creation: Evidence from Spinoffs. Journal of Financial Economics, 1997, vol. 45, iss. 2, pp. 257–281.
  11. Allen J.W., Lummer S.L., McConnell J.J., Reed D.K. Can Takeover Losses Explain Spin-off Gains? The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1995, vol. 30, iss. 4, pp. 465–485.
  12. Chemmanur T., Yan An. A Theory of Corporate Spin-offs. Journal of Financial Economics, 2004, vol. 72, iss. 2, pp. 259–290.
  13. Parrino R. Spinoffs and Wealth Transfers: The Marriot Case. The Journal of Financial Economics, 1997, vol. 43, iss. 2, pp. 241–274.
  14. Aron D. Using Capital Market as a Monitor: Corporate Spin-offs in an Agency Framework. The RAND Journal of Economics, 1991, iss. 4, pp. 505–518.
  15. Nanda V., Narayanan M. Disentangling Value: Financing Needs, Firm Scope, and Divestitures. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 1999, vol. 8, iss. 3, pp. 174–204.
  16. Grossman S., Stiglitz J. On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets. American Economic Review, 1980, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 393–408.
  17. Dennis D., McConnell J. Corporate Mergers and Security Returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 1986, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 143–187.
  18. Asquith P., Bruner R.F., Mullins D.W. The Gains to Bidding Firms from Mergers. Journal of Financial Economics, 1983, vol. 11, iss. 1-4, pp. 121–139.
  19. Loderer C., Martin K. Corporate Acquisition Announcement: Time Series Patterns. University of Iowa, 1990.
  20. Porter M. From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 1987, May, pp. 43–59.
  21. Rosenfeld J. Additional Evidence on the Relation between Divestiture Announcements and Shareholder Wealth. The Journal of Finance, 1984, vol. 39, iss. 5, pp. 1437–1448.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-9438 (Online)
ISSN 2073-8005 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 29, Iss. 1
March 2024

Archive