+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
Russian version 

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

A retrospective of socio-cultural integrity of individualism as propaedeutics of modern political economy analysis

Vol. 17, Iss. 10, OCTOBER 2021

Received: 24 June 2021

Received in revised form: 10 July 2021

Accepted: 25 July 2021

Available online: 15 October 2021

Subject Heading: Priorities of Russia

JEL Classification: B41

Pages: 18301854

https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.17.10.1830

Boris V. SALIKHOV Moscow State Linguistic University (MSLU), Moscow, Russian Federation
mgsusalikhov@yandex.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6123-9603

Subject. The article addresses socio-cultural qualitative integrity of individualistic concept as a metaphysical basis of political economy analysis in the context of actualization of non-economic and non-cognitive factors of economic development.
Objectives. The aim is to develop a formation sequence of the qualitative integrity of ontological paradigm of individualism as propaedeutics of the innovative form of modern political and economic development of countries and areas worldwide.
Methods. The study draws on interdisciplinary, logical and epistemological, and qualitative analysis of individualism as a general basis for the formation and development of the public sector of the modern economy; and the content analysis of modern relevant domestic and foreign sources.
Results. The result of the research is the imperative of understanding individualism as a socio-cultural phenomenon, which is a unity of value forms that determine the internal logic of a systematic approach to the modern political and economic analysis of economic development. The paper emphasizes the critical importance of permanent primacy of constitutional principles and freedoms of the individual, as well as the secondary nature of the post-constitutional institutions of coordination, even if they are inclusive and imply the stability of functioning and the unconditional protection of property rights.
Conclusions. The scientific and practical significance of paper is in the possibility to use directly the elements of qualitative integrity of the ontological paradigm of Hayek's individualism for the development of an innovative model of political economy analysis of any economic system, taking into account its socio-cultural and civilizational features.

Keywords: individualism, socio-cultural integrity, spontaneous activity, "rules of play", property rights

References:

  1. Voskoboinikov I.B., Baranov E.F., Bobyleva K.V. et al. [Recovery experiences of the Russian economy: The patterns of the post-shock growth after 1998 and 2008 and future prospects]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2021, no. 4, pp. 532. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  2. Grigorev L.M., Pavlyushina V.A., Muzychenko E.E. [The fall into 2020 recession]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2020, no. 5, pp. 525. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  3. Klinova M.V. [The State and national competitiveness (the case of EU)]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2020, no. 8, pp. 146159. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  4. Mau V.A. [Coronavirus pandemic and trends of economic policy]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2021, no. 3, pp. 531. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  5. Shastitko A.E. [Between the Scylla of despotism and the Charybdis of social norms (on the book by D. Acemoglu and J.A. Robinson "Narrow Corridor: States, Societies and the Fate of Freedom")]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2020, no. 1, pp. 145157. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  6. Ershov M.V. [The world in 2020: New challenges expose systemic changes in the economy]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2020, no. 12, pp. 524. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  7. Hayek F.A. Doroga k rabstvu [The Road to Serfdom]. Moscow, AST, Astrel Publ., 2010, 317 p.
  8. Hayek F.A. Individualizm i ekonomicheskii poryadok [Individualism and Economic Order]. Moscow, Izograf Publ., 2000, 256 p.
  9. Tambovtsev V.L. [Narrative analysis in economic theory as climbing complexity]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2020, no. 4, pp. 531. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  10. Bobylev S.N., Zubarevich N.V., Soloveva S.V. [Challenges of the crisis: How to measure sustainable development?]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2015, no. 1, pp. 147160. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  11. Buzgalin A., Kolganov A. ["Marketocentric" economics is obsolete]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2004, no. 3, pp. 3650. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  12. Polterovich V.M. [Crisis of institutions of political competition, Internet and collaborative democracy]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2021, no. 1, pp. 5273. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  13. Buzgalin A.V. [The decline of neoliberalism (to the 200th birth anniversary of Karl Marx)]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2018, no. 2, pp. 122142. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  14. Danilov-Danil'yan V. [Global crisis as a consequence of structural changes in economy]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2009, no. 7, pp. 3142. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  15. Polterovich V.M. [Towards a general theory of socio-economic development. Part 1. Geography, institutions or culture?]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2018, no. 11, pp. 527. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  16. Polterovich V.M. [Towards a general theory of socio-economic development. Part 2. Evolution of coordination mechanisms]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2018, no. 12, pp. 77103. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  17. Kolodko G.W. [After. Economics and politics in the post-pandemic world]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2020, no. 5, pp. 2545. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  18. Buchanan J.M. Sochineniya [Writings]. Moscow, Taurus Alfa Publ., 1997, 560 p.
  19. Jung C.G. Ob energetike dushi [The Earth Has a Soul]. Moscow, Akademicheskii proekt, Fond Mir Publ., 2010, 297 p.
  20. Keynes J.M. Obshchaya teoriya zanyatosti, protsenta i deneg [The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money]. Moscow, Gelios ARV Publ., 2002, 352 p.
  21. Vedin N.V. Ekonomicheskaya neodnorodnost' obmena v khozyaistvennoi evolyutsii obshchestva [Economic heterogeneity of exchange in the economic evolution of the society]. St. Petersburg, NPK ROST Publ., 2006, 218 p.
  22. Rozhkova K.V. [The return to noncognitive characteristics in the Russian labor market]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2019, no. 11, pp. 81107. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  23. Trubitsyn D.V. [Institutions, individuals, and social relations in the modernization process]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2020, no. 12, pp. 125141. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  24. Hegel G.W.F. Filosofiya prava [Philosophie des Rechts]. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1990, 524 p.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 2
February 2024

Archive