+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Development of environmental entrepreneurship in the use of marine waste

Vol. 12, Iss. 3, MARCH 2016

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 5 November 2015

Received in revised form: 7 December 2015

Accepted: 11 December 2015

Available online: 29 March 2016

Subject Heading: Priorities of Russia

JEL Classification: M13, M19, Q53, Q58

Pages: 59-66

Korshenko E.A. Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russian Federation
alexander.korshenko@gmail.com

Gafforova E.B. Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russian Federation
gafforova.eb@dvfu.ru

Korshenko A.I. Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russian Federation
alexander.korshenko@gmail.com

Importance Currently, artificial waste pollute and contaminate oceans, seas and coastal areas, being one of the most critical environmental challenges.
Objectives The research identifies how Russian businesses can handle marine debris on the basis of the best foreign practices for preserving marine flora and fauna.
Methods The research substantiates marine waste recycling on the basis of data on pollution of oceans, seas and coastal areas, and analyzes methods for using marine waste as the basis for environmental entrepreneurship in global practices.
Results We analyzed key areas for using ocean debris in production, and methods for their recycling in developed countries. Companies strive to increase the environmental culture of the public, deepen their understanding of the need to protect the environment and encourage relevant entrepreneurship, rather than attracting more consumers to products only.
Conclusions and Relevance Considering the ubiquitous nature of marine waste, marine waste are examined so to get reliable information on the pollution of oceans, seas and coastal areas of nearby countries. Such researchers and their methodology rely upon the UN Environment Program (UNEP) Regional Seas. The private sector should develop new pathways for utilizing the collected waste.

Keywords: environmental entrepreneurship, marine waste, environmental protection, natural resource management, waste recycling

References:

  1. Moore S.L., Allen M.J. Distribution of Anthropogenic and Natural Debris on the Mainland Shelf of the Southern California Bight. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2000, vol. 40, iss. 1, pp. 83–88.
  2. Gall S.C., Thompson R.C. The Impact of Debris on Marine Life. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2015, vol. 92, iss. 1-2, pp. 170–179.
  3. Debrot A.O., Meesters H.W.G., Bron P.S. Marine Debris in Mangroves and on the Seabed: Largely-Neglected Litter Problems. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2013, vol. 72, iss. 1, p. 1.
  4. Barnes D.K.A., Milner P. Drifting Plastic and its Consequences for Sessile Organism Dispersal in the Atlantic Ocean. Marine Biology, 2005, vol. 146, iss. 4, pp. 815–825.
  5. Barnes D.K.A. Biodiversity: Invasions by Marine Life on Plastic Debris. Nature, 2002, vol. 416, no. 6883, pp. 808–809.
  6. Andrady A.L. Microplastics in the Marine Environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2011, vol. 62, iss. 8, pp. 1596–1605.
  7. Browne M.A., Dissanayake A., Galloway T.S., Lowe D.M., Thompson R.C. Ingested Microscopic Plastic Translocates to the Circulatory System of the Mussel, Mytilus edulis (L.). Environmental Science and Technology, 2008, vol. 42, iss. 13, pp. 5026–5031.
  8. Cole M., Lindeque P., Halsband C., Galloway T.S. Microplastics as Contaminants in the Marine Environment: a Review. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2011, vol. 62, iss. 12, pp. 2588–2597.
  9. Topçu E.N., Tonay A.M., Dede A. Origin and Abundance of Marine Litter along Sandy Beaches of the Turkish Western Black Sea Coast. Marine Environmental Research, 2013, vol. 85, pp. 21–28.
  10. Schilining K., Thun S., Kuhnz L. et al. Debris in the Deep: Using a 22-year Video Annotation Database to Survey Marine Litter in Monterey Canyon, Central California, USA. Deep Sea Research Part 1: Oceanographic Research Papers, 2013, vol. 79, pp. 96–105.
  11. Schulz M., Neumann D., Fleet D.M., Matthies M. A Multi-Criteria Evaluation System for Marine Litter Pollution Based on Statistical Analyses of OSPAR Beach Litter Monitoring Time Series. Marine Environmental Research, 2013, vol. 92, pp. 61–70.
  12. Oosterhuis F., Papyrakis E., Boteler B. Economic Instruments and Marine Litter Control. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2014, vol. 102, pp. 47–54.
  13. Hastings E., Potts T. Marine Litter: Progress in Developing an Integrated Policy Approach in Scotland. Marine Policy, 2013, vol. 42, pp. 49–55.
  14. Ballance A., Ryan P., Turpie J.K. How Much is a Clean Beach Worth? The Impact of Litter on Beach Users in the Cape Peninsula. South Africa Journal of Science, 2000, vol. 96, iss. 5, pp. 210–213.
  15. Debrot A.O., Rijn V., Bron P.S. A Baseline Assessment of Beach Debris and Tar Contamination in Bonaire, Southeastern Caribbean. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2013, vol. 71, iss. 1-2, pp. 325–329.
  16. Galgani F., Claro F., Depledge M., Fossi C. Monitoring the Impact of Litter in Large Vertebrates in the Mediterranean Sea within the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD): Constraints, Specificities and Recommendations. Marine Environmental Research, 2014, vol. 100, pp. 3–9.
  17. Ryan P.G. A Simple Technique for Counting Marine Debris at Sea Reveals Steep Litter Gradients between the Straits of Malacca and the Bay of Bengal. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2013, vol. 69, iss. 1-2, pp. 128–136.
  18. Williams A., Gregory M., Tudor D. Marine Debris: Onshore, Offshore, Seafloor. In: Encyclopedia of Coastal Science. Dordrecht, Springer, 2013, pp. 623–628.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive