Tselyutina T.V.Belgorod National Research University, Belgorod, Russian Federation tselyutina@bsu.edu.ru
Importance The research focuses on diverse aspects of functional representation of civil society institutions, the place and the role of economic, social and political relationships in developing civil society institutions, which shape patterns of sustainable regional development. Objectives The research critically evaluates and substantiates the dependence of regional development sustainability on transparent representation of civil society institutions. Methods The general methodological framework relies upon a dialectical and historical approach coupled with simultaneous, comparative and systems methods. Results We made a detailed description of civil society institutions, their place and role in public and socio-economic administration. The research determined the institutional specifics of representing group interests through civil society institutions and dependence of the sustainable regional development strategy's outcome on relevant and available transparent mechanisms for territorial management. Conclusions and Relevance Sustainable regional development is achievable only if citizens are more active in increasing their standards of living on a systemic basis, and all communication channels between the public and the State are involved. The proposed scientific recommendations, ideas and conclusions can be applied by authorities to prepare socio-economic projects for sustainable regional development and vital programs for supporting the communication between authorities and civil society institutions.
Keywords: civil society institution, sustainable development, local authorities
References:
Glaz'ev S.Yu. Strategiya operezhayushchego razvitiya Rossii v usloviyakh global'nogo krizisa: monografiya [The strategy of priority development of Russia during the global crisis: a monograph]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 2010, 48 p.
McGlenahen J.S. 15 Survival Strategies for New Millennium. Industry Week, 2009, vol. 241, no. 17, pp. 22–32.
Kremlev N.D. [Human development evaluation methods]. Statistika i obshchestvo: istoriya, sovremennost', razvitie. Tom 1: materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Proc. All-Russian Sci. Conf. Statistics and Society: History, Present, Development. Volume 1]. Ufa, IS-PPI AN RB Publ., 2010, 418 p.
Shul'ts V.L., Kul'ba V.V., Shelkov A.B. et al. Informatsionnoe upravlenie v usloviyakh aktivnogo protivoborstva: modeli i metody: monografiya [Information management under an active confrontation: models and methods: a monograph]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2011, 187 p.
Isaeva E.A., Maklashin I.S., Sokolov A.V., Frolov A.A. Regional'nye aspekty grazhdanskoi aktivnosti v sovremennoi Rossii (na primere Yaroslavskoi oblasti): monografiya [Regional aspects of civic engagement in modern Russia: evidence from the Yaroslavl oblast: a monograph]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2015, 216 p.
Rochet J.C., Tirole J. Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets. JournalofEuropeanEconomicAssociation, 2003, no. 1(4), pp. 990–1029.
Mingaleva Zh.A., Gershanok G.A. Ustoichivoe razvitie regiona: innovatsii, ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost', konkurentosposobnost' [Sustainable development of the region: innovation, economic security, competitiveness]. Ekonomika regiona = The Region's Economy, 2012, no. 3, pp. 68–77.
Nizhegorodtsev R.M. [The Haavelmo theorem and growing points of Russia's modern economy]. Strategicheskoe planirovanie i razvitie predpriyatii: materialy IX Vserossiiskogo simpoziuma [Proc. 9th Sci. Conf. Strategic Planning and Development of Enterprises]. Moscow, CEMI RAS Publ., 2008, pp. 123–125.
Cohen A.J., Harcourt G.C. Retrospectives: Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies? JournalofEconomicPerspectives, 2003, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 199–214.
Pavlov M.Yu. Innovatsionnoe razvitie ekonomiki: ot Gomsted-akta do elektronnykh kottedzhei i vikinomiki [Innovative development of the economy: from the Homestead Act towards electronic cottages and wikinomics]. SShA i Kanada: ekonomika, politika, kul'tura = United States and Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture, 2012, no. 12, pp. 49–60.
Perskaya V.V. Mnogopolyarnost': mif ili real'nost' (geoekonomicheskie aspekty) [Multipolarity: a myth or reality (geo-economic aspects)]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 2011, 255 p.
Vazhenin S.G., Bersenev V.L., Vazhenina I.S., Tatarkin A.I. Territorial'naya konkurentsiya v ekonomicheskom prostranstve [Territorial competition in the economic area]. Yekaterinburg, Institute of Economy of Ural Branch of RAS Publ., 2011, 540 p.
Kang K.H., Lee S., Huh C. Impacts of Positive and Negative Corporate Social Responsibility Activities on Company Performance in the Hospitality Industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2010, vol. 29, iss. 1, pp. 72–82.
Tatarkin A.I. [Innovative development of Russia: from political calls to anti-crisis activities]. Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya biznesa i biznes-obrazovaniya v Rossii: materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Proc. Int. Sci. Conf. Modern Trends of Business Development and Business Education in Russia]. Chelyabinsk, South Ural State University Publ., 2010, pp. 3–14.
Ushachev I.G., Serkov A.F., Paptsov A.G., Tarasov V.I., Chekalin V.S. Problemy obespecheniya natsional'noi i kollektivnoi prodovol'stvennoi bezopasnosti v EAES [Issues of ensuring national and collective food security in the EEC]. APK: ekonomika, upravlenie = AIC: Economy, Management, 2014, no. 10, pp. 3–15.
Yakobson L.I. [Do the Russian NPO act as 'schools of democracy'?]. XIV Aprel'skaya mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya po problemam razvitiya ekonomiki i obshchestva. V 4 kn. Kn. 2: materialy mezhdunarodnoi konferetsii [Proc. 14th April International Conference on Issues of Economic and Social Development. Four Volumes. Volume 2]. Moscow, HSE Publ., 2014, pp. 471–480.
Becchetti L., Di Giacomo S., Pinnacchio D. Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Performance: Evidence from a Panel of US Listed Companies. Applied Economics, 2008, vol. 40, iss. 5, pp. 541–567.
Ehsan S., Kaleem À. An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Evidence from Manufacturing Sector of Pakistan. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2012, no. 2(3), pp. 2909–2922.
Turker D. Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility: A Scale Development Study. Journal of Business Ethics, 2009, vol. 85, iss. 4, pp. 411–427.
