+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Central banks of the Customs Union countries: criteria and approaches to assessment of independence

Vol. 10, Iss. 41, NOVEMBER 2014

Available online: 1 November 2014

Subject Heading: Priorities of Russia

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 2-13

Golodova Zh.G. People's Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation
golodova@yandex.ru

Importance In today's environment of the global financial and economic crisis, the debate about the relationship between the degree of central bank independence and effectiveness of ongoing monetary policy has intensified. Though, the principle of independence is defined de jure as the basic one in the central banks' operations of the majority of the States, de facto, that principle is not like that. Very often, it leads to the economic situation destabilization. This problem is of particular importance for developing countries, which banking legislation and the central banks' activities need for further improvement. It fully applies to the countries of the Customs Union: Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia. The level of independence of their central banks does not match the similar parameters of the developed countries' central banks; it also slightly decreased during the period of market transformations.
     Objectives The strengthening of integration processes within the framework of the Customs Union of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia, and the transition to coordination of the main elements of monetary policy brought the necessity to identify the areas to ensure the central banks' independence, carrying out comparative analysis of the degree of their independence, as well as to identify the areas of its improvement.
     Methods On the basis of the two most common methods (GMT-index and CWN-index), I have assessed the index of independence of the central banks of the Customs Union in development. I came to a conclusion that it is preferable to use the CWN-index that takes into account a greater variance of characteristics and nonequivalence of independence criteria.
     Results I showed the evolution of approaches to the definition of central bank independence, described its characterizing criteria and made an assessment of the degree of central bank's independence. I defined the reasons of the changes that took place during the period of market transformations and identified factors affecting the degree of central bank's independence, including those, which defy formalization.
     Conclusions and Relevance Banking legislation of the Customs Union countries, set up in the early 1990s, was consistent with international practice in general, and it contains the basic provisions to ensure their central banks' independence. However, starting from the early 2000s, a downward trend in independence of the central banks of Russia and Belarus began to show up, that was due to the emergence of the requirement of compulsory participation of the Government in the formulation of monetary policy, an increase of its impact on the central banks' activities, and the expansion of the motives for the dismissal of the head of central bank and other issues.

Keywords: central bank, central bank independence, central bank independence criteria, monetary policy, GMT-index, CWN-index, Customs Union

References:

  1. Golodova Zh.G. Vzaimodeistvie tsentral'nykh bankov i pravitel'stv: razlichiya i formy proyavleniya v usloviyakh mirovogo krizisa [Interaction between central banks and governments: differences and forms of its manifestation under global crisis]. Finansy i kredit – Finance and credit, 2009, no. 17, pp. 2231.
  2. Trunin P.V., Knyazev D.A., Satdarov A.M. Analiz nezavisimosti tsentral'nykh bankov Rossiiskoi Federatsii, stran Sodruzhestva Nezavisimykh Gosudarstv i Vostochnoi Evropy [An analysis of the independence of the central banks of the Russian Federation, CIS and Eastern European countries]. Moscow, Institute for Economy in Transition Publ., 2010, 76 p.
  3. Alesina A. Macroeconomics and Politics. Macroeconomics Annual. MIT Press, 1988, pp. 1352.
  4. Alesina A., Summers L. Central Bank Independence and Macroeconomic Performance: Some Comparative Evidence. Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 1993, May, pp. 151162.
  5. Bade R., Parkin M. Central Bank Laws and Monetary Policy. University of Western Ontario, 1988, October. Available at: Link.
  6. Cukierman A., Webb S.B., Neyapti B. Measuring the Independence of Central Banks and Its Effect on Policy Outcomes. The World Bank Economic Review, 1992, vol. 6, iss. 3, pp. 353398.
  7. Debelle G., Fischer S. How Independent Should a Central Bank Be? Boston, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. Goals, Guidelines and Constraints Facing Monetary Policymakers, Conference Series, 1994, June, no. 38, pp. 195221.
  8. Eijffinger S.C.W., J. de Haan. The Political Economy of Central Bank Independence. Special Papers in International Economics. 1996, May, no. 19. Available at: Link.
  9. Grilli V., Masciandaro D., Tabellini G. Political and Monetary Institutions and Financial Policies in Industrial Economies: Economic Policy. A European Forum, 1991, no. 6, pp. 342392.
  10. Neyapti B. Central bank independence and economic performance in Eastern Europe. Bilkent University, Economic Systems, 2001, no. 25, pp. 381399.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive