+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
National Interests: Priorities and Security
 

Reduction factors of power intensity in Russian economy

Vol. 10, Iss. 25, JULY 2014

Available online: 28 June 2014

Subject Heading: Priorities of Russia

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 2-9

Ratner S.V. V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences, RAS, Moscow, Russian Federation
lanarat@mail.ru

The article considers the reduction of energy consumption and carbon emissions is one of the main priorities for the state and business. World practice shows that the effect of reducing the power intensity of the economy and reduce greenhouse gas emissions can be achieved through technological progress. The main directions of this progress are the research and development (R&D) and technological diffusion. The author points out that the main channel of technological diffusion is direct investment in many modern foreign researches. This paper justifies hypothesis that both foreign direct investment and domestic expenditure on research and development are the factors reducing power intensity of the Russian economy. The method of research is econometric modeling. The work reveals that, intensification of national research and development has a significant impact on the reduction of energy consumption, rather than technological spillover. This article proposes an explanation for this phenomenon, based on the theory of technological absorption and results of previous studies of cost barriers on the way of diffusion of energy efficient technologies and alternative energy technologies.

Keywords: energy intensity, carbon intensity, technological diffusion, foreign direct investment, research, development, econometric model

References:

  1. Ratner S.V., Iosifov V.V. Stoimostnye bar'ery diffuzii tekhnologii al'ternativnoi energetiki v Rossii [Cost barriers diffusion of alternative energy technologies in Russia]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriia i praktikaEconomical analysis: theory and practice, 2013, no. 40, pp. 25–33.
  2. Lei R., Zhang Y., Wei S. International Technology Spillover, Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions in China. Low Carbon Economy, 2012, vol. 3, pp. 49–53.
  3. Hossain S. An Econometric Analysis for CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, Foreign Trade and Urbanization of Japan. Low Carbon Economy, 2012, vol. 3, pp. 92–105.
  4. Romer P.M. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 98, 1990, no. 5, pp. 71–102.
  5. Cole M.A., Elliott R.J.R. and Wu S. Industrial Activity and the Environment in China: An Industry-Level Analysis. China Economic Review, vol. 19, 2008, no. 3, pp. 393–408.
  6. Griffith R., Redding S., Reenen J.V. Mapping the Two Faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 86, 2004, no. 4, pp. 883–895.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-875X (Online)
ISSN 2073-2872 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive