+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
International Accounting
 

Double materiality or how to transcend the matrix of material topics when reporting on sustainable development

Vol. 28, Iss. 1, JANUARY 2025

Received: 26 November 2024

Accepted: 23 December 2024

Available online: 20 January 2025

Subject Heading: CORPORATE SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY

JEL Classification: M40, M41

Pages: 79-99

https://doi.org/10.24891/ia.28.1.79

Tat'yana N. SOLOVEI Saint-Petersburg State University (SPbSU), St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
t.solovey@eu.spb.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7453-297X

Ol'ga A. TEPLOVA Research Center for Energy Policy and International Relations of European University at St. Petersburg (EUSP ENERPO Center), St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
oteplova@eu.spb.ru

https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7365-6097

Subject. This article discusses the non-financial reporting of Russian companies, international and national standards and initiatives in the field of sustainable development.
Objectives. The article aims to analyze the distinctive features of approaches to determining material topics in the formation of sustainability reporting, as well as identify the approach used by representatives of Russian companies in the for­mation of non-financial reporting at present.
Methods. For the study, we used analysis and synthesis, comparison, and generalization.
Results. Based on consideration of the evolution of approaches to determining materiality in the formation of sustainability reporting, the article substantiates the priority of the Double Materiality approach, which is gradually replacing the approach of determining the Materiality of Impacts, summarizes the steps to select material topics, and identifies the characteristic features of the formation of sustainability reports by Russian companies in terms of stakeholder engagement and identification of material topics.
Conclusions and Relevance. In recent years, international and national standards and initiatives in the field of sustainable development contain recommen­dations on the application of the Double Materiality approach, which in turn implies not only the assessment of Impact Materiality, but the assessment of Financial Materiality as well. At the moment, Russian companies mainly apply the approach to determining material topics based on the assessment of the company's impact on the economy, environment and society, while the disclosure of information on the consideration of stakeholder opinions is formal. The findings suggest that most Russian companies are in the process of revising their approach to determining material topics, which implies a step-by-step review of this process engaging stakeholders. The results obtained can be used by experts in the field of sustainable development and representatives of companies when preparing recommendations for assessing materiality in the formation of non-financial reporting.

Keywords: stakeholders, materiality, sustainability reporting, non-financial reporting, material topics

References:

  1. Freeman R.E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press, 2010, 292 p.
  2. Freeman R.E., Harrison J.S., Wicks A.C. et al. Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge University Press, 2010, 362 p.
  3. Porter M.E., Kramer M.R. Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review, 2011, vol. 89, nos. 1-2, pp. 62–77. URL: Link
  4. Bernini F., La Rosa F. Research in the Greenwashing Field: Concepts, Theories, and Potential Impacts on Economic and Social Value. Journal of Management and Governance, 2024, vol. 28, iss. 2, pp. 405–444. URL: Link
  5. Montgomery A.W., Lyon T.P., Barg J. No End in Sight? A Greenwash Review and Research Agenda. Organization & Environment, 2024, vol. 37, iss. 2, pp. 221–256. URL: Link
  6. Vuković R., Vukić N.M., Sesar D. Non-Financial Reporting as Part of Sustainability Accounting with the Examples of Good Practices. Journal of Accounting and Management, 2020, vol. 10, iss. 1, pp. 41–58. URL: Link
  7. Wagenhofer A. Sustainability Reporting: A Financial Reporting Perspective. Accounting in Europe, 2024, vol. 21, iss. 1, pp. 1–13. URL: Link
  8. Mel’nik M.V., Velikhanov M.T. [Corporate social responsibility: Completeness and transparency of information]. Uchet. Analiz. Audit = Accounting. Analysis. Auditing, 2023, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 6–20. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  9. Morozova E.V. [Corporate ESG information disclosures]. Uchet. Analiz. Audit = Accounting. Analysis. Auditing, 2024, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 39–49. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  10. Sapozhnikova N.G. [Non-financial reporting of corporations]. Uchet. Analiz. Audit = Accounting. Analysis. Auditing, 2023, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 34–47. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  11. Nesterova A.A. [Forming judgments about materiality in relation to non-financial reporting: An international view]. Upravlencheskii uchet = Management Accounting, 2023, no. 5, pp. 408–413. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  12. Malinovskaya N.V., Kireeva D.E. [Sustainability factors consideration: Emerging trends in financial reporting]. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting, 2024, vol. 27, iss. 1, pp. 4–21. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  13. Malinovskaya N.V. [International sustainability reporting standards: A comparative analysis]. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting, 2022, vol. 25, iss. 11, pp. 1206–1224. (In Russ.) URL: Link

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-9381 (Online)
ISSN 2073-5081 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 28, Iss. 1
January 2025

Archive

Видите ошибку в отчестве? Отключите перевод, это английская версия сайта!