+7 495 989 9610, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
International Accounting
 

Trademarks: The retrospect, definitions, partial tools of research

Vol. 24, Iss. 2, FEBRUARY 2021

Received: 1 February 2021

Received in revised form: 3 February 2021

Accepted: 5 February 2021

Available online: 14 February 2021

Subject Heading: LEGAL REGULATION OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITY IN RUSSIA AND FOREIGN COUNTRIES

JEL Classification: К15

Pages: 206–226

https://doi.org/10.24891/ia.24.2.206

Yuliya V. ZHIL'TSOVA National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod (UNN), Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation
Gilcova_Julya@mail.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1747-0389

Alina V. ZHIL'TSOVA MTS PJSC, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation
alina-zhiltc@yandex.ru

ORCID id: not available

Ol'ga А. PAVLOVA National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod (UNN), Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation
olga.pavlova_winner@mail.ru

ORCID id: not available

Subject. Currently, the growing competition and the economic crisis make manufacturers and sellers actively use trademarks so as to win new business and retain customers. Over 80 percent of any buying decision depend on the visual information, rather than the reasonable approach. Legal issues of trademark use in business relations draw the attention of professional and scientific communities in Russia and abroad, dating back to far away times.
Objectives. We provide the rationale for a clearer definition of trademark for purposes of legal relations, examine the partial tools for studying verbal trademarks, and conduct an experiment to prove the efficiency of tachistoscopic tools for trademark studies as part of legal examinations.
Methods. The study is based on general and partial methods of research. Studying verbal trademarks, the use of tachistoscopic tools helped conduct an experiment and make conclusions, notwithstanding a small sample.
Results. Trademarks circulated in business affairs even in the A.C. times. In the second half of the 19th century, advanced economies set up the legislative framework on personalization means. All corresponding regulations are still being improved consistently. The systems approach and generalization helped sort out priority views on the concept trademark and coin a more specific term, which is important for scientific and practical activities of lawyers, managers and economists. Drawing upon the experiment, we made respective conclusions and suggest extrapolating them to similar studies as part of legal examinations.
Conclusions and Relevance. Trademark is a construct of law from professionals' perspectives and a symbol attracting people’s attention to goods as ordinary people perceive it. In mixed economies, consumers’ perception of goods significantly determines the producer’s market position. Therefore, many market actors need to specify the concept trademark, including legal departments of companies. Trademark disputes have become more frequent cases heard by the Russian arbitration courts. So, the specified definition and the experiment are of scientific and applied value. The findings are designated to improve the legislative framework for personalization means. The tools and findings we present in our experiment can serve not only for scientific, but also practical purposes of legal examinations concerning verbal trademarks. They will also work for teaching on legal disciplines.

Keywords: legal regulation, original trademark, copy trademark, buyer risks, tachistoscopic research tools, experiment

References:

  1. Tsybakov D.L., Lisenkova I.A. [Genesis of the concept of trademark in legal thought and legal practice]. Vestnik gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya = Journal of Public and Municipal Administration, 2017, no. 1, pp. 60–63. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  2. Zhil'tsova Yu.V., Zhil'tsova A.V. [The Russian–German customs war and trade agreements of 1893 and 1904. Part One]. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting, 2018, vol. 21, iss. 7, pp. 852–866. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  3. Ivanova E.G. [The development history of the concept of trademark and its functions]. Yuridicheskaya nauka = Legal Science, 2014, no. 3, pp. 48–51. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  4. Pankova M.N. [Evolution and development of legislation on the individualization in Russia]. Vestnik Voennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Military University, 2011, no. 3, pp. 156–163. (In Russ.)
  5. Romanov S.S. [Trademark: Concept and types]. Tavricheskii nauchnyi obozrevatel' = Tavrida Scientific Observer, 2016, no. 12. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  6. Egorov V.V., Egorova E.V. [The trademark as a marketing and law phenomenon]. Journal of New Economy, 2008, no. 3, pp. 20–25. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  7. Verkholetov M.A. [Trademark and commercial name: Correlative problems of the legal regulation]. Mariiskii yuridicheskii vestnik = Mary Law Vestnik, 2016, no. 3, pp. 81–84. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  8. Pavlova S.A. [Trademark as a subject of legal protection]. Vestnik nauki i obrazovaniya = Bulletin of Science and Education, 2020, no. 24-4, pp. 36–39. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  9. Saponov D.I. [The tachistocopic technique for studying the confusion of trademarks]. Monitoring, 2010, no. 4. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  10. Navruzalieva V.N. [Trademarks and service marks concept and features at modern conditions market economy]. Gumanitarnye i yuridicheskie issledovaniya = Humanities and Law Studies, 2013, no. 3, pp. 54–56. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  11. Komlev N.Yu., Fazlieva L.K. [Legal protection of trademark: Theory and practice]. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii =Scientific Notes of Kazan Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, 2019, no. 2, pp. 63–67. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  12. Zhuravlev A.P. Foneticheskoe znachenie [Phonetic meaning]. Leningrad, Leningrad State University Publ., 1974, 160 p.
  13. Novichikhina M.E., Sternin I.A. Ekspertiza tovarnogo znaka [The trademark examination]. Voronezh, Voronezh State University Publ., 2013, 98 p.
  14. Richardson J. Evaluating the Finished Package. In: Handbook of Package Design Research. USA, John Wiley and Sons, 1981, 590 p.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-9381 (Online)
ISSN 2073-5081 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 24, Iss. 2
February 2021

Archive