+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
International Accounting
 

Anomalies of the control principle as part of the consolidated financial reporting concept

Vol. 24, Iss. 1, JANUARY 2021

Received: 8 October 2020

Received in revised form: 22 December 2020

Accepted: 28 December 2020

Available online: 14 January 2021

Subject Heading: THEORY OF ACCOUNTING

JEL Classification: M40, M41

Pages: 24–47

https://doi.org/10.24891/ia.24.1.24

Sergei V. KOLCHUGIN Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management (NSUEM), Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
s.kolchugin@rambler.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9575-1920

Subject. The article discusses the impact of the control principle on the existing consolidated financial reporting concept.
Objectives. I evaluate possible alterations in the consolidation methodology as a result of the anomaly of the control principle.
Methods. The study is based on the method of analogy for scientific hypothesizing. The study methodologically relies upon Thomas Kuhn's paradigm shift theory and the impact of anomalies on methodological principles of normal science. The study combines the analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, and the method of comparison when analyzing the existing control criteria and identifying anomalies of the control principles as part of the consolidated financial reporting concept, and examining how the anomaly influences the consolidation methodology.
Results. I discovered that the control principle in the consolidated financial reporting concept influences the consolidation methodology. I suggest using my own methodological approach to preparing consolidated financial statements in case of the non-equity control the parent company holds over its subsidiary.
Conclusions and Relevance. The control principle in the consolidated financial reporting concept has not been formalized, thus causing anomalies affecting methodological principles of consolidated financial reporting. The non-equity control of the parent company over its subsidiary is a case in point. This control induces unavoidable changes in the consolidation methodology. The findings can be used to prepare consolidated financial statements in case of the non-equity control of the parent company over its subsidiary.

Keywords: consolidated financial reporting, consolidation criteria, principle of control, control anomaly, consolidated accounting methodology

References:

  1. Previts G.J., Merino B.D. A History of Accounting in America. An Historical Interpretation of the Culture Significance of Accounting. New York, Wiley, 1979, 378 p.
  2. Edwards J.R. The Process of Accounting Innovation: The Publication of Consolidated Accounts in Britain in 1910. The Accounting Historians Journal, 1991, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 113–132. Stable URL: Link
  3. Dickinson A.L. Notes on Some Problems Relating to the Accounts of Holding Companies. Journal of Accountancy, 1906, April, pp. 487–491.
  4. Beckman H. The New EU-Directive on Annual and Consolidated Financial Statements. European Company Law, 2013, vol. 10, iss. 6, pp. 199–212.
  5. Lopes A.I., Lopes M. Effects of adopting IFRS 10 and IFRS 11 on Consolidated Financial Statements. Meditari Accountancy Research, 2019, vol. 27, iss. 1, pp. 91–124. URL: Link
  6. Ben-Shahar D., Sulganik E., Tsang D. Does IFRS 10 on Consolidated Financial Statements Abandon Accepted Economic Principles. Australian Accounting Review, 2019, vol. 26, iss. 4, pp. 341–345. URL: Link
  7. Parker R.H. Explaining National Differences in Consolidated Accounts. Accounting and Business Research, 1977, vol. 7, iss. 27, pp. 203–207. URL: Link
  8. Kitchen J. The Accounts of British Holding Company Groups: Development and Attitudes to Disclosure in the Early Years. Accounting and Business Research, 1972, vol. 2, iss. 6, pp. 114–136. URL: Link
  9. Whittred G. The Evolution of Consolidated Financial Reporting in Australia. Abacus, 1986, vol. 22, iss. 2, pp. 103–120. URL: Link
  10. Gardini S., Grossi G. Voluntary Adoption of the Consolidated Financial Statement and Fair Value. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 2014, vol. 26, iss. 2, pp. 313–344. URL: Link
  11. Abad C., Laffarga J., García-Borbolla A. et al. An Evaluation of the Value Relevance of Consolidated versus Unconsolidated Accounting Information. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 2000, vol. 11, iss. 3, pp. 156–177. URL: Link
  12. Lopes A.I., Lourenço I., Soliman M. Do Alternative Methods of Reporting Non-Controlling Interests Really Matter? Australian Journal of Management, 2012, vol. 38, iss. 1, pp. 7–30. URL: Link
  13. Christopher N. An Analysis of the International Development of the Equity Method. Abacus, 2002, vol. 38, iss. 1, pp. 16–45. URL: Link
  14. Shaw J.C. Criteria for Consolidation. Accounting and Business Research, 1976, vol. 7, iss. 25, pp. 71–78. URL: Link
  15. Arcady A.T., Hugo D. Understanding the Latest Changes in Consolidated Financial Statements. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 1999, vol. 10, iss. 4, pp. 39–53.
  16. Krimpmann A. Principles of Group Accounting under IFRS. United Kingdom, John Wiley & Sons, 2015, 820 p.
  17. Taylor P.A. Consolidated Financial Reporting. Markus Wiener Publishers, 1996, 365 p.
  18. Pacter P. Consolidations and Deferred Income Taxes. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 1994, vol. 9, iss. 3, pp. 607–618. URL: Link
  19. Ketz E.J. Accounting for Business Combinations in an Age of Changing Prices. Accounting and Business Research, 1984, vol. 14, iss. 55, pp. 209–216. URL: Link
  20. Burroughs R.J. Consolidated Balance Sheet and Income Statement for Agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1945, vol. 27, iss. 2, pp. 463–472.
  21. Kuhn Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., 1996, 212 p.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-9381 (Online)
ISSN 2073-5081 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 27, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive