+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
International Accounting
 

Assessing the materiality threshold and scope of auditing procedures: The sector-specific approach

Vol. 23, Iss. 6, JUNE 2020

Received: 28 May 2020

Received in revised form: 8 June 2020

Accepted: 10 June 2020

Available online: 16 June 2020

Subject Heading: AUDIT ACTIVITY

JEL Classification: М42

Pages: 683–700

https://doi.org/10.24891/ia.23.6.683

Safonova M.F. Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin (Kuban SAU), Krasnodar, Russian Federation
safsf@yandex.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5825-4316

Korovina K.G. Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin (Kuban SAU), Krasnodar, Russian Federation
kristina.korovina.98@mail.ru

ORCID id: not available

Subject. As part of any audit engagement, the auditor needs to obtain reasonable assurance that financial statements are free from material misstatements. For this, they assess the tolerable threshold of errors for financial statements, which, if exceeded, will influence the correctness of users' conclusions and adequacy of their subsequent decisions. International Standards on Auditing guide the assessment of the materiality threshold. However, the approach they stipulate fails to accommodate for the sectoral specifics and distinctions of some audited entities.
Objectives. We assess the stable structural correlation of key financial reporting indicators through a sample of 130 agricultural entities operating in the Krasnodar Krai. The study presents a technique for assessing the materiality by variance from the average values of the sector as the size of a company may be.
Methods. We apply general and special methods, such as induction, deduction, analysis, synthesis, computational graphics, monographs, algorithms.
Results. In some cases, the resultant data appeared to significantly diverge at the estimated materiality level. Having analyzed the causes, we proved the reasonableness of the computations done by out technique. As a conclusion, we sum up strengths and weaknesses of the materiality assessment technique.
Conclusions and Relevance. The enhanced materiality assessment technique accommodates for the sectoral specifics of agricultural entities. Assessing the materiality level, we revealed the structural correlation of various assets and liabilities. The technique is based on actual data and adaptable, if needed, to the given algorithm. It is more precise for non-standard entities. The findings can be used in the auditing theory and practice, serve for setting the accounting process and financial reporting in various entities. It will also be useful for the Master's Degree Programs in Economics.

Keywords: audit, level of materiality, audit risk, statement errors, methodology, assets, liabilities, revenue, profit, structural relationships

References:

  1. Kozmenkova S.V. [Assessing the materiality level during audit planning]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Ekonomika i finansy = Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhny Novgorod. Series: Economics and Finance, 2001, no. 1, pp. 95–98. (In Russ.)
  2. Devyatkin V.A. [Optimization and automation of materiality calculation during an audit of financial statements]. Uchet. Analiz. Audit = Accounting, Analysis, Auditing, 2015, no. 2, pp. 101–107. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  3. Egorova I.S. [Particularities of materiality level identification of an audited entity]. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting, 2014, no. 16, pp. 47–57. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  4. Skorodumov V.A. [What is the correct way of assessing the acceptable level of materiality]. Auditorskie vedomosti = Audit Journal, 2014, no. 6, pp. 4–11. (In Russ.)
  5. Schepot'ev A.V. [The appropriate materiality threshold: An explanation, computations]. Auditorskie vedomosti = Audit Journal, 2008, no. 11.
  6. Slobodyan M.L. [Problem aspects of assessment of materiality in the audit of financial statements]. Diskussiya = Discussion, 2017, no. 2, pp. 27–32. (In Russ.)
  7. Kochinev Yu.Yu. [An assessment of the materiality threshold]. Auditor, 2016, no. 8, pp. 12–15. (In Russ.)
  8. Fedoseenko T.V. [On new approaches to materiality assessment in determining the general audit strategy]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta kooperatsii = Bulletin of Russian University of Cooperation, 2018, no. 3, pp. 86–91. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  9. Kemaeva S.A., Zhil'tsova Yu.V., Kozmenkova S.V. [International Standards on Auditing as described and used by professional auditors]. Bukhgalterskii uchet v byudzhetnykh i nekommercheskikh organizatsiyakh = Accounting in Budgetary and Non-Profit Organizations, 2017, no. 4, pp. 28–37. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  10. Zhil'tsova Yu.V., Kemaeva S.A., Kozmenkova S.V., Maslova T.S. [Formation of the up-to-date paradigm of audit as applied science]. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting, 2018, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1037–1049. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  11. Safonova M.F., Petukh A.V. [Methods for ensuring the quality of auditing in the Russian Federation]. Vestnik Akademii znanii = Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge, 2018, no. 4, pp. 309–316. (In Russ.)

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-9381 (Online)
ISSN 2073-5081 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 27, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive