International Accounting

Abstracting and Indexing

Referativny Zhurnal VINITI RAS
Google Scholar

Online available



Cyberleninka (24 month OA embargo)

The impact of IFRS adoption on influx of foreign direct investment in transition economies

Vol. 22, Iss. 11, NOVEMBER 2019

PDF  Article PDF Version

Received: 9 September 2019

Received in revised form: 24 September 2019

Accepted: 1 November 2019

Available online: 15 November 2019


JEL Classification: F21, F36, P45

Pages: 1239–1255

Abduraupov R.R. Republican Graduate School of Business and Management named after Abu Raihan Beruni under National Agency of Project Management under the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan (RGSBM NAPM), Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan

ORCID id: not available

Ibragimov F.A. Ernst & Young, Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan

ORCID id: not available

Khamidov B.B. Republican Graduate School of Business and Management named after Abu Raihan Beruni under National Agency of Project Management under the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan (RGSBM NAPM), Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan

ORCID id: not available

Subject Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is of special importance for the economic well-being of nations. FDI and their sources are found to help countries improve their fund raising opportunities. IFRS adoption especially influences the investment attractiveness.
Objectives The study examines the subsequent impact of IFRS adoption on the FDI influx in transition economies by analyzing panel data of 190 observations based on 17 countries within 2000–2016.
Methods The reliability of findings is verified with a set of tests, such as the Ordinary Least Squares regression, Hausmann specification test, Panel-Corrected Standard Error regression, Generalized Methods of Moments and Difference-in-Difference methods.
Results The findings demonstrate that the national accounting harmonization with IFRS inversely influences FDI. The reason may be that the transparency of financial reports clarifies the future benefits for investors, which incidentally does not meet their expectations. Therefore, they refrain from investing. The reliability of the findings is verified with additional tests. Furthermore, the Difference-in-Difference analysis reveals a similar trend even for transition economies aspiring their EU membership.
Conclusions and Relevance The research debunks the hypothesis stating that IFRS adoption might have a positive effect on the influx of FDI in the case of transition economies.

Keywords: FDI, IFRS, transition economies


  1. Chen Ch.J.P., Ding Yu., Xu B. Convergence of Accounting Standards and Foreign Direct Investment. The International Journal of Accounting, 2014, vol. 49, iss. 1, pp. 53–86. URL: Link
  2. Lipsy R., Chrystal A. Economics. 10th edition. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 641–642.
  3. Dunning J.H. The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 1988, vol. 19, iss. 1, pp. 1–31. URL: Link
  4. Gordon L.A., Loeb M.P., Zhu W. The Impact of IFRS Adoption on Foreign Direct Investment. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2012, vol. 31, iss. 4, pp. 374–398. URL: Link
  5. Asiedu E., Lien D. Democracy, Foreign Direct Investment and Natural Resources. Journal of International Economics, 2011, vol. 84, pp. 99–111. URL: Link
  6. Márquez-Ramos L. European Accounting Harmonization: Consequences of IFRS Adoption on Trade in Goods and Foreign Direct Investments. Emerging Markets: Trade and Finance, 2008, vol. 47, sup. 4, pp. 42–57. URL: Link
  7. Portes R., Rey H. The Determinants of Cross-Border Equity Flows. Journal of International Economics, 2005, vol. 65, iss. 2, pp. 269–296. URL: Link
  8. Henock L., Oktay U. The Effect of IFRS on Cross-Border Acquisitions. SSRN Papers, 2014. URL: Link
  9. Daske H., Hail L., Verdi R. Mandatory IFRS Reporting Around the World: Early Evidence on the Economic Consequences. Journal of Accounting Research, 2008, vol. 46, iss. 5, pp. 1085–1442. URL: Link
  10. Wysocki P. New Institutional Accounting and IFRS. Accounting and Business Research, 2011, vol. 41, iss. 3, pp. 309–328. URL: Link
  11. Wehfritz M., Haller A. National Influence on the Application of IFRS: Interpretations and Accounting Estimates by German and British Accountants. Advances in Accounting, 2014, vol. 30, iss. 1, pp. 196–208. URL: Link
  12. Nnadi M., Soobariyen T.М. International Financial Reporting Standards and Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of Africa. Advances in Accounting, 2015, vol. 31, iss. 2, pp. 228–238. URL: Link
  13. Beck N., Katz J.N. What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data. American Political Science Review, 1995, vol. 89, iss. 3, pp. 634–647. URL: Link
  14. Baum Ch.F., Cerulli G. Estimating a Dose-Reponse Function with Heterogeneous Response to Cofounders When Treatment in Continuous and Endogenous. URL: Link
  15. Globerman S., Shapiro D. Global Foreign Direct Investment Flows: The Role of Governance Infrastructure. World Development, 2002, vol. 30, iss. 11, pp. 1899–1919. URL: Link00110-9
  16. Blundell R., Bond S. Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, 1998, vol. 87, iss. 1, pp. 115–143. URL: Link00009-8
  17. Easterly W., Pfutze T. Where Does the Money Go? Best and Worst Practices in Foreign Aid. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2008, vol. 22, iss. 2, pp. 1–27. URL: Link

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-9381 (Online)
ISSN 2073-5081 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 23, Iss. 6
June 2020