+7 495 989 9610, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»






International Accounting

Separate accounting for financial performance of public procurement contractors

Vol. 22, Iss. 8, AUGUST 2019

Received: 22 July 2019

Received in revised form: 31 July 2019

Accepted: 5 August 2019

Available online: 15 August 2019

Subject Heading: Managerial accounting

JEL Classification: М40

Pages: 846–858


Ivashkevich V.B. Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University (KFU), Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation

ORCID id: not available

Subject The article discusses whether modern methods and foreign practices of management accounting can be used to evaluate the profitability of public procurement orders.
Objectives The research determines the specifics of public procurement orders and contracts in terms of their substance, placement and performance, specifics of costs, accounting methods and costing of supplies, fair and reasonable prices, profitability scenarios based on separate accounting data.
Methods The research is based on methods of systems approaches, analysis and evaluation of the existing practice, abstraction, generalization, analogy and modeling.
Results I analyzed the existing rules for general and separate accounting for financial and business performance as is in public procurement contractors. I suggest the entities should adhere to direct costing principles, classify costs as variable and fixed, assess value added by order and contract in a more comprehensive and advanced way. This will make prices and rates for public procurement services and goods more reasonable, thus not only recovering the contractor's costs, but also developing production and technological capabilities. I focus on accounting for costs and results of public procurement orders by cost centers of administrative personnel, which is technologically based on computer-assisted systems for business data processing.
Conclusions and Relevance A contract should be used as an accounting item of public procurement contractors' financial performance. Accountants should trace production and selling expenses, liabilities, tangible and intangible assets associated with each contract. Respective income and expenses are assessed with the accrual method. Direct costs for any public procurement order should account for the extent to which they correlate with the percentage of work to be completed. Indirect costs should be posted to cost centers of relevant managers. Thus, entities will get new analytical opportunities for separate accounting, fitting it into governance and control functions. The findings can apply to theoretical issues of financial and management accounting and financial performance, contribute to suggestions and recommendations for improving the existing separate accounting rules for financial performance of public procurement contractors.

Keywords: separate accounting, public procurement, contract price


  1. Petrovskaya M.V., Vasil'eva L.S. [Accounting and evaluation of product pricing factors]. Upravlencheskii uchet = Management Accounting, 2019, no. 2, pp. 31–41. (In Russ.)
  2. Sharovatova E.A. [The specifics of management accounting for costs by sectoral technologies of enterprises]. Vestnik professional'nogo bukhgaltera = Bulletin for Professional Accountants, 2016, no. 2, pp. 44–48. (In Russ.)
  3. Sheshukova T.G., Mal'tseva A.A. [Methods for evaluating the public procurement efficiency in national research universities]. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya = Financial Analytics: Science and Experience, 2015, no. 13, pp. 2–9. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  4. Sheshukova T.G. [The efficiency of public procurement in budgetary institutions: A methodological aspect]. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting, 2018, vol. 21, iss. 2, pp. 149–158. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  5. Ivashkevich V.B. Integrirovannyi uchet v sisteme upravleniya predpriyatiem [Integrated accounting as part of corporate governance]. Moscow, Magistr, INFRA-M Publ., 2018, 124 p.
  6. Filin S.A., Chaikovskaya L.A., Satymbekova K.B. [Innovative technologies in accounting]. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting, 2019, vol. 22, iss. 4, pp. 393–408. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  7. Shatina E.N. [Audit of the single-source procurement of goods, works and services]. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting, 2019, vol. 22, iss. 1, pp. 84–97. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  8. Leibert T.B., Khalikova E.A. [Integration of accounting and management for the purpose of intra-enterprise management]. Audit i finansovyi analiz = Audit and Financial Analysis, 2015, no. 2, pp. 61–68. (In Russ.)
  9. Holroyd C., Coates K. The Global Digital Economy: Comparative Policy Analysis. New York, Cambria Press, 2015, 302 p.
  10. Garifullin K.M., Ivashkevich V.B., Sokolov A.Yu. et al. Formirovanie i ispol'zovanie informatsii bukhgalterskogo ucheta dlya prinyatiya upravlencheskikh reshenii [The compilation and use of accounting data for managerial decision-making]. Moscow, RuScience Publ., 2016, 126 p.
  11. Horton K.E., Wanderley C.A. Identity Conflict and the Paradox of Embedded Agency in the Management Accounting Profession: Adding a New Piece to the Theoretical Jigsaw. Management Accounting Research, 2018, vol. 38, pp. 15–27. URL: Link
  12. Bakaev A.S. Primenenie polozheniya po vedeniyu bukhgalterskogo ucheta i bukhgalterskoi otchetnosti v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Aktual'nyi kommentarii [The application of accounting and financial reporting regulations in the Russian Federation]. Savropol, TIPB Publ., 2011, 186 p.
  13. Kotova K.Yu. [The systems approach to building the corporate management accounting model]. Upravlencheskii uchet = Management Accounting, 2016, no. 2, pp. 22–34. (In Russ.)
  14. Evstaf'eva E.M. [Theoretical and practical aspects of preparation of statements on the basis of accounting and analytical support of management system]. Audit i finansovyi analiz = Audit and Financial Analysis, 2015, no. 5, pp. 25–35. (In Russ.)
  15. Lebedev K.N. [The future of accounting in terms of the prospects for improvement of planning]. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting, 2017, vol. 20, iss. 3, pp. 135–149. (In Russ.) URL: Link
  16. Shigaev A.I. [Orientation to consumers in the administrative account abroad]. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting, 2011, no. 22, pp. 35–46. URL: Link (In Russ.)
  17. Upchurch A. Upravlencheskii uchet: printsipy i praktika [Management Accounting: Principles and Practice]. Moscow, Finansy i Statistika Publ., 2002, 952 p.
  18. Ahrens T. Praktika upravlencheskogo ucheta: opyt evropeiskikh kompanii [Russian-language edition. Management Accounting as a Practice]. Minsk, Novoe izdanie Publ., 2004, 416 p.
  19. Volkov D.L. Teoriya tsennostno-orientirovannogo menedzhmenta: finansovyi i bukhgalterskii aspekty: monografiya [The theory of value-based management: Financial and accounting considerations: a monograph]. St. Petersburg, Graduate School of Management at St. Petersburg University Publ., 2008, 320 p.
  20. Shigaev A.I. [System of accounting and analysis for value-based management]. Audit i finansovyi analiz = Audit and Financial Analysis, 2011, no. 4, pp. 338–347. (In Russ.)

View all articles of issue


ISSN 2311-9381 (Online)
ISSN 2073-5081 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 25, Iss. 5
May 2022