Samusenko S.A.Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Krai, Russian Federation sv_sam@bk.ru
Importance The article considers the theory of the genesis of double entry bookkeeping, its various historical versions, and the concept of capital as a backbone element in the origin of double entry bookkeeping. Objectives The purpose is to reveal historical and causal relationships between the concept of owner's capital and various hypotheses of the genesis of double entry bookkeeping that reflect their historical and logical interdependence. Methods The study employs methods of analysis, synthesis, comparison, grouping, generalization, and the system approach. Results I analyze hypotheses of the origin of the double-entry bookkeeping based on formal features of double entry bookkeeping, according to A. Sangster's concept. The paper presents my own investigation and critical assessment of the Indian version of the genesis of double entry bookkeeping and supplements the Roman and Greek versions with recent research data. It discloses the significance of the owner's capital concept as a factor of the origin of the double bookkeeping in all historical versions. I show that the existence of the concept of capital and capital accounts without other formal characteristics do not serve as sufficient evidence of the existence of double entry bookkeeping. Conclusions The paper verifies the hypothesis that the existence of accounts for financial results relating to capital gains calculation is one of formal features of double entry bookkeeping. It shows that alternative historical versions of the genesis of double entry bookkeeping are also connected with the existence and use of capital accounts in accounting books.
Keywords: double entry bookkeeping, capital, accounting history
References:
Pyatov M.L. [Evolution of accounting methodology within the balance model of the company]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, seriya 5. Ekonomika = Bulletin of Saint Petersburg State University. Ser. 5 Economics, 2014, no. 4, pp. 56–75. (In Russ.)
Mattessich R. Accounting and the Input-Output Principle in the Prehistoric and Ancient World. Abacus, 1989, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 74–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.1989.tb00222.x
Needles B.E., Anderson H.R., Caldwell J.C. Printsipy bukhgalterskogo ucheta [Principles of Accounting]. Moscow, Finansy i Statistika Publ., 2004, 496 p.
Balikoev V.Z. [On the origin of the capital category (for discussion purposes)]. Sibirskaya finansovaya shkola = Siberian Financial School, 2008, no. 1, pp. 100–101. (In Russ.)
Kovalev V.V. [On the concepts of capital]. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Economics and Management, 2010, no. 7, pp. 73–80. (In Russ.)
Kuter M.I., Gurskaya M.M. [The history of capital accounting]. Bukhgalterskii uchet = Accounting, 2010, no. 3, pp. 106–113. (In Russ.)
Tsygankov K.Yu. [The concept of capital in accounting, political economy and economic theory]. Sibirskaya finansovaya shkola = Siberian Financial School, 2007, no. 3, pp. 11–20. (In Russ.)
Tsygankov K.Yu., Fadeikina N.V. [Capital and profit as concepts and indicators: Origin, economic sense, role in management]. Sibirskaya finansovaya shkola = Siberian Financial School, 2015, no. 6, pp. 141–151. (In Russ.)
Bauer O.O. Memuary k istorii bukhgalterii i pamyatniki svyashchennoi stariny [Memoirs on the history of accounting and monuments of sacred antiquity]. Moscow, Pechatnya S.P. Yakovleva Publ., 1911, 341 p.
Littleton A.C. Accounting Evolution to 1900. University of Alabama Press, 1933, 373 p.
Galagan A.M. Schetovodstvo v ego istoricheskom razvitii [Accounting in its historical development]. Moscow, Leningrad, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo Publ., 1927, 171 p.
Raymond Adrien de Roover. Kak voznikla dvoinaya bukhgalteriya [The Development of Accounting Prior to Luca Pacioli according to the Account Books of Medieval Merchants]. Moscow, Gosfinizdat Publ., 1958, 68 p.
Sangster A. The Genesis of Double Entry Bookkeeping. The Accounting Review, 2016, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 299–315.
Kuter M.I., Gurskaya M.M. [Pacioli's treatise, formal characteristics of double-entry bookkeeping, balance sheet classification (structure, contents and function)]. Uchet. Analiz. Audit = Accounting. Analysis. Audit, 2015, no. 1, pp. 123–132. (In Russ.)
Martinelli A. Notes on the Origin of Double Entry Bookkeeping. Abacus, 1977, vol. 13, iss. 1, pp. 3–27.
Tsygankov K.Yu. [Management, capital, capitalism and accounting: Theoretical and methodological aspects]. Sibirskaya finansovaya shkola = Siberian Financial School, 2013, no. 3, pp. 139–155. (In Russ.)
Lall Nigam B.M. Bahi-Khata: The Pre-Pacioli Indian Double-entry System of Bookkeeping. Abacus, 1986, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 148–161. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.1986.tb00132.x
Kanaeva N.A. [Knowledge Classification in the Traditional Indian Culture]. Voprosy Filosofii, 2014, no. 1, pp. 115–126. (In Russ.)
Mattessich R. Review and extension of Bhattacharyya's Modern Accounting Concepts in Kautilya's Arthashastra. Accounting, Business and Financial History, 1998, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 191–209.
Choudhury N. Aspects of Accounting and Internal Control – India 4th Century B.C. Accounting and Business Research, 1982, vol. 12, iss. 46, pp. 105–110.
Bhattacharyya A.K. Modern Accounting Concepts in Kautilya's Arthasastra. Calcutta, Firma KLM Private, 1988.