+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
International Accounting
 

Modern managerial accounting theories in works by foreign authors

Vol. 18, Iss. 36, SEPTEMBER 2015

Received: 25 September 2015

Received in revised form: 2 October 2015

Accepted: 13 October 2015

Available online: 27 January 2016

Subject Heading: Managerial accounting

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 33-46

Samusenko S.A. Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Krai, Russian Federation
sv_sam@bk.ru

Importance Rapid development of economic systems, management methods and social sciences imposes new requirements to managerial accounting. Modern theories of managerial accounting developed by foreign authors are influenced by social sciences, namely, institutional economics, sociology, psychology and management theory.
     Objectives The paper aims to systematize modern foreign studies addressing the formation and development of theories of managerial accounting.
     Methods In the paper, I employ methods of analysis, synthesis, comparison, grouping, summarizing, and the systems approach.
     Results The paper describes the nature of normative and positive accounting theories and their impact on the formation and development of theories of managerial accounting, reviews differences between rigorous theories and concepts of managerial accounting, considers empirical and constructive approaches to development of managerial accounting concepts. Furthermore, I systematize modern theories of managerial accounting, i.e. the contingency theory, the agency theory, and sociological and psychological theories.
     Conclusions Modern concepts of management accounting relate to the normative accounting theory. They aim at forming the fundamental principles and methods to solve practical problems, and apply the postulates and tools of a wide group of social and economic sciences. Developing the research within each group of theories leads to their mutual penetration, cross-use of results and common tools.

Keywords: management accounting theory, contingency theory, agency theory, sociological theory, psychological theory

References:

  1. Mattessich R. Conditional-normative Accounting Methodology: Incorporating Value Judgments and Means-End Relations of an Applied Science. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1995, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 259–284.
  2. Watts R.L., Zimmerman J.L. Towards a Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards. The Accounting Review, 1978, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 112–134.
  3. Mouck T. Positive Accounting Theory as a Lakatosian Research Programme. Accounting and Business Research, 1990, vol. 20, no. 79, pp. 231–239.
  4. Watts R.L., Zimmerman J.L. Positive Accounting Theory: A Ten Year Perspective. The Accounting Review, 1990, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 131–156.
  5. Watts R.L., Zimmerman J.L. The Demand for and Supply of Accounting Theories: The Market for Excuses. The Accounting Review, 1979, vol. 54, no. 2. pp. 273–305.
  6. Kasanen E., Lukka K., Siitonen A. The Constructive Approach in Management Accounting. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 1993, vol. 5, pp. 243–264.
  7. Zimmerman J.L. Conjectures Regarding Empirical Managerial Accounting Research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2001, no. 32, pp. 411–427.
  8. Ittner C., Larcker D. Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2001, no. 32, pp. 349–410.
  9. Cooper R. Cost Classification in Unit-Based and Activity-Based Manufactured Cost System. Journal of Cost Management, 1990, no. 3. pp. 4–14.
  10. Malmi T., Granlund V. In Search of Management Accounting Theory. European Accounting Review, 2009, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 597–620.
  11. Innes J., Mitchell F. The Process of Change in Management Accounting: Some Field Study Evidence. Management Accounting Research, 1990, vol. 1, pp. 3–19.
  12. Burns T., Stalker G.M. The Management of Innovation. London, Tavistock Publications, 1961, 269 p.
  13. Lawrence P.R., Lorsch J. Organization and Environment. Boston, Harvard Business School, Division of Research, 1967.
  14. Gong M.Z., Tse M.S. Pick, Mix or Match? A Discussion of Theories for Management Accounting Research. Journal of Accounting, Business and Management, 2009, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 54–66.
  15. Claudio W., Cullen J. Management Accounting Change: a Review. Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da Unisinos, 2013, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 294–307.
  16. Johnson H.T., Kaplan R.S. Relevance Lost: The Rise and the Fall of Management Accounting. Boston, Harvard University Press, 1987.
  17. Burns J., Vaivio J. Management accounting change. Management Accounting Research, 2001, vol. 12, iss. 4, pp. 389–402.
  18. Busco C., Quattrone P., Riccaboni A. Management Accounting: Issues in Interpreting its Nature and Change. Management Accounting Research, 2007, vol. 18, iss. 2, pp. 125–149.
  19. Kasurinen T. Exploring Management Accounting Change: the Case of Balanced Scorecard Implementation. Management Accounting Research, 2002, vol.13, iss. 3, pp. 323–343.
  20. Cobb I., Helliar C., Innes J. Management Accounting Change in a Bank. Management Accounting Research, 1995, vol. 6, iss. 2. pp. 155–175.
  21. Baiman S. Some Ideas for Further Research in Managerial Accounting. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 2014, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 119–121.
  22. Baiman S., Noel J. Noncontrollable Costs and Responsibility Accounting. Journal of Accounting Research, 1985, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 486–501.
  23. Baiman S., May J.H., Mukherji A. Optimal Employment Contracts and the Returns to Monitoring in a Principal-Agent Context. Contemporary Accounting Research, 1990, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 761–799.
  24. Baiman S., Rajan M. The Role of Information and Opportunism in the Choice of Buyer-Supplier Relationships. Journal of Accounting Research, 2002, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 247–278.
  25. Baiman S., Netessine S., Saouma R. Informativeness, Incentive Compensation and the Choice of Inventory Buffer. The Accounting Review, 2010, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 1839–1860.
  26. Wildavsky A., Caiden N. The New Politics of the Budgetary Process. New York, Pearson/Longman, 2004, 253 p.
  27. Hopper T., Powell A. Making Sense of Research into the Organizational and Social Aspects of Management Accounting: a Review of its Underlying Assumptions. Journal of Management Studies, 1985, vol. 22, iss. 5, pp. 429–465.
  28. Burrell G., Morgan G. Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. Aldershot, Ashgate Publishing, 2007, 727 p.
  29. Birnberg J.G., Shields J. Three decades of behavioral research: A search for order. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 1989, vol. 1, pp. 23–74.
  30. Birnberg, J.G. A Proposed Framework for Behavioral Accounting Research. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 2011, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–43.
  31. Dickhaut J., Basu S., McCabe K., Waymire G. Neuroaccounting: Consilience between the Biologically Evolved Brain and Culturally Evolved Accounting Principles. Accounting Horizons, 2010, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 221–255.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-9381 (Online)
ISSN 2073-5081 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 27, Iss. 2
February 2024

Archive