+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
International Accounting
 

Operating and investment biological assets: composition and valuation (status, problems and solutions)

Vol. 18, Iss. 26, JULY 2015

Received: 1 July 2015

Accepted: 6 July 2015

Available online: 25 August 2015

Subject Heading: INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS OF ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 13-22

Dyatlova A.F. Moscow University of Ministry of Interior of Russian Federation named after V.Y. Kikot, Moscow, Russian Federation
angelina09_63@mail.ru

Vas'kin F.I. Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University, Balashikha, Moscow Oblast, Russian Federation
vaskfedor@yandex.ru

Subject The article analyzes the possibility and necessity of practical application of major provisions of IAS 41 Agriculture by agricultural goods producers, in particular, fair value measurement of biological assets.
     Objectives The purpose of the paper is to characterize biological assets in crop farming and livestock breeding, and to justify the possibility to measure biological assets at fair value instead of historical cost.
     Methods In the study, we employed various methods and techniques, i.e. the monographic method, accounting method, systematization and generalization of scientific and practical material, and other standard methods of scientific knowledge.
     Results The article presents the classification characteristic of biological assets, defines objective conditions for fair value calculation of biological assets, and shows the inconsistency of various conventional methods for fair value calculation (except market). We emphasize that it is unnecessary and impossible for agricultural goods producers to measure biological assets at fair value (instead of historical cost), except for organizations that prepare consolidated financial statements in full compliance with IFRS.
     Conclusions and Relevance Under modern socio-economic conditions and without open market of biological assets, it is impossible to determine their fair value. Meanwhile, other methods for fair value calculation are conditional and unreal; they misstate the financial condition and performance of agricultural economic entities. Therefore, it is required to stick to the existing method of biological assets valuation (i.e. at historical cost) to prevent disturbances in the accounting, tax and statistical information systems of the country.

Keywords: biological assets, operating, investment, biological transformation, fair value

References:

  1. Vas'kin F.I., Dyatlov A.S. Investitsionnye aktivy i ikh otsenka: problemy i resheniya [Investment assets and their valuation: problems and solutions]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo zaochnogo universiteta = Bulletin of Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University, 2015, no. 17, pp. 144–149.
  2. Belov N.G. Ob otsenke aktivov v sel'skom khozyaistve [On asset valuation in agriculture]. Bukhuchet v sel'skom khozyaistve = Accounting in Agriculture, 2008, no. 10, pp. 3–11.
  3. Dyatlova A.F., Vas'kin I. Problemy adaptatsii polozhenii MSFO 41 v rossiiskuyu praktiku sel'skogo khozyaistva [Problems of adapting the provisions of IAS 41 in the Russian agricultural practice]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo zaochnogo universiteta = Bulletin of Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University, 2006, no. 1, pp. 357–363.
  4. Fastova E.V., Alborov R.A., Kontsevaya S.M. Uchet biologicheskikh aktivov po spravedlivoi stoimosti v sootvetstvii s MSFO 41 “Sel'skoe khozyaistvo” [Accounting for biological assets at fair value under IAS 41 Agriculture]. Ekonomika sel'skokhozyaistvennykh i pererabatyvayushchikh predpriyatii = Economy of Agricultural and Processing Enterprises, 2007, no. 1, pp. 33–39.
  5. Khoruzhii L.I., Khusainova A.S. Varianty metodov ucheta biologicheskikh aktivov i sel'skokhozyaistvennoi produktsii [Options of accounting treatment of biological assets and agricultural produce]. Bukhuchet v sel'skom khozyaistve = Accounting in Agriculture, 2013, no. 3, pp. 13–23.
  6. Alborov R.A., Kontsevaya S.M., Zakharova E.V. Razvitie upravleniya biologicheskimi aktivami i ucheta rezul'tatov ikh biotransformatsii v sel'skom khozyaistve [Developing the management of biological assets and accounting for their biotransformation results in agriculture]. Izhevsk, Izhevsk SAA Publ., 2009, 165 p.
  7. Stepanenko E.I. Metodika ucheta aktivov sel'skokhozyaistvennykh predpriyatii po spravedlivoi stoimosti v sootvetstvii s printsipami MSFO [Accounting treatment of agricultural enterprises’ assets at fair value under IFRS principles]. Vestnik RGAZU = Bulletin of Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University, 2008, no. 5, pp. 322–324.
  8. Gasanov M.Yu. Problemy adaptatsii MSFO 41 “Sel'skoe khozyaistvo” [Problems of adapting IAS 41 Agriculture]. Bukhuchet v sel'skom khozyaistve = Accounting in Agriculture, 2014, no. 12, pp. 73–77.
  9. Kontsevoi G.K. Sovershenstvovanie metodiki otsenki i upravlencheskogo ucheta material'nykh i biologicheskikh zatrat v sel'skom khozyaistve [Improving the methods for valuation and management accounting of tangible and biological costs in agriculture]. Ekonomika sel'skokhozyaistvennykh i pererabatyvayushchikh predpriyatii = Economy of Agricultural and Processing Enterprises, 2015, no. 1, pp. 26–29.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-9381 (Online)
ISSN 2073-5081 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 27, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive