Importance Investors and other stakeholders around the world are becoming increasingly concerned with corporate social and environmental policies. As a result, many organizations are voluntarily increasing the extent of disclosure of non-financial information in their reports. At the same time the academic community fails to reach consensus on the role of corporate social responsibility in the system of accounting types. Numerous international publications on this subject allow identifying accounting areas, which have been significantly evolving for the recent years, and areas that have been insufficiently studied. Objectives The purpose of the paper is to identify, compare and critically analyze promising trends in the theory and practice of social accounting and non-financial reporting to create opportunities for further research. Methods The research uses methods of analysis, synthesis, grouping and comparison to review and systematize various academic views on corporate social responsibility as a subject of the accounting science. Results We analyze subject matters and contents of scientific publications the leading global accounting journals of Scopus data base have released for the recent five years. As a result, we provide an overview of areas covered by contemporary researchers; describe the most vital issues existing at the current phase of social accounting and non-financial reporting. Conclusions and Relevance As the research shows, rapid development of corporate social responsibility reporting initiatives entails an array of theoretical and empirical challenges in contemporary accounting science and practice, since entities and stakeholders have different approaches to understanding, interpreting and providing assurance as to such statements. Research results may prove helpful in educational, methodological and scientific activities.
Keywords: corporate social responsibility, social, environmental accounting, non-financial reporting, integrated report, sustainable development, stakeholder theory
Demchuk O.N. Formirovanie sotsial'noi otvetstvennosti biznesa v sfere malogo predprinimatel'stva: monografiya [Forming a corporate social responsibility in small entrepreneurship: a monograph]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 2011, 157 p.
Ivashkovskaya I.V. Razvitie steikkholderskogo podkhoda v metodologii finansovogo analiza: garmonichnaya kompaniya [Developing the stakeholder approach as part of the financial analysis methodology: a harmonious company]. Korporativnye finansy = Journal of Corporate Finance Research, 2011, no. 3, pp. 59–70.
Sorokina K.V. Integrirovannaya otchetnost' – novaya model' otchetnosti dlya biznesa [Integrated financial statements are a new model for business reporting]. Korporativnaya finansovaya otchetnost’.Mezhdunarodnye standarty = Corporate Financial Statements. International Standards, 2011, no. 7, pp. 3–14.
Aggarwal P. Relationship between Environmental Responsibility and Financial Performance of Firm: a Literature Review. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 2013, no. 13, pp. 13–22.
Al-Tuwaijri S.A., Christensen T.E., Hughes K.E. The Relations among Environmental Disclosure, Environmental Performance, and Economic Performance: a Simultaneous Equations Approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2004, no. 29, pp. 447–471.
Branco M.C., Rodrigues L.L. Factors Influencing Social Responsibility Disclosure by Portuguese Companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 2008, vol. 83, iss. 4, pp. 685–701.
Campbell D. A Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Analysis of Environmental Disclosure in UK Companies – a Research Note. The British Accounting Review, 2004, no. 36, pp. 107–117.
Cormier D., Magnan M., Van Velthoven B. Environmental Disclosure Quality in Large German Companies: Economic Incentives, Public Pressures or Institutional Conditions? European Accounting Review, 2005, no. 14, pp. 3–39.
Edgley C., Jones M.J., Atkins J. The Adoption of the Materiality Concept in Social and Environmental Reporting Assurance: A Field Study Approach. The British Accounting Review, 2014, March 2015, vol. 47, iss. 1, pp. 1–18.
Fernandez-Feijoo B., Romero S., Ruiz S. Commitment to Corporate Social Responsibility Measured through Global Reporting Initiative Reporting: Factors Affecting the Behavior of Companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, no. 81, pp. 244–254.
Gamerschlag R., Möller K., Verbeeten F. Determinants of Voluntary CSR Disclosure: Empirical Evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science, 2011, vol. 5, iss. 2-3, pp. 233–262.
Hassan A., Ibrahim E. Corporate Environmental Information Disclosure: Factors Influencing Companies' Success in Attaining Environmental Awards. Corporate SocialResponsibility and Environmental Management, 2012, vol. 19, iss. 1, pp. 32–46.
Hong H., Kubik J.D., Scheinkman J.A. Financial Constraints on Corporate Goodness. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2012, no. w18476.
The International IR Framework. International Integrated Reporting Council, IIRC, 2013. Available at: Link.
Jose A., Lee S.M. Environmental Reporting of Global Corporations: A Content Analysis Based on Website Disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 2007, no. 72-4, pp. 307–321.
Corporate Responsibility Reporting Survey 2013. KPMG, 2013. Available at: Link.
Marsat S., Williams B. Does the Market Value Social Pillar? Available at: Link.
Moser D.V., Martin P.R. A Broader Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility Research in Accounting. The Accounting Review, 2012, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 797–806.
Nobes C. Harmonization of Financial Reporting. In: Comparative International Accounting. Hertfordshire, Prentice Hall, 1991, pp. 70–91.
Qiu Y., Shaukat A., Tharyan R. Environmental and Social Disclosures: Link with Corporate Financial Performance. The British Accounting Review, 2014. Available at: Link.
Shannon D. Richard Posner’s Theory of Wealth Maximization. In: Efficiency Instead of Justice? Springer Netherlands, 2009, pp. 143–183.
Trotman A.J., Trotman K.T. Internal Audit's Role in GHG Emissions and Energy Reporting: Evidence from Audit Committees, Senior Accountants, and Internal Auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 2015, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 199–230.