+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ИД «Финансы и кредит»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
International Accounting
 

Financial analysis of insolvent companies: the role of financial and tax reporting

Vol. 18, Iss. 14, APRIL 2015

Available online: 7 June 2015

Subject Heading: FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 30-40

L'vova N.A. Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
lvova_n.a@mail.ru

Pokrovskaya N.V. Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
nvpokrovskaia@gmail.com

Importance Financial analysis of insolvent companies requires special methodological approaches that would take into account the specifics of bankruptcy legislation and the debtor's unfavorable position. Russia has the mandatory Rules that govern the analysis of business entities in receivership. The Rules emphasize the significant role of analyzing financial statements. The relevant methods are not free from weaknesses. They almost ignore analytical capabilities of tax reporting, thus determining the main subject of the research.
     Objectives The objective of the research is to substantiate recommendations on improvement of methodological approaches to analyzing insolvent businesses on the basis of their financial statements and tax returns.
     Methods The article reviews the specificity of analyzing the debtor in compliance with the effective Rules and relevant clauses of the Draft Federal Standard on Analysis of the debtor's financial position and results of its financial, operating and investments activities as part of bankruptcy procedures. The methodology of the research relies upon the theory of corporate financial analysis. The recommendations are substantiated with regard to scope of financial statements and tax returns.
     Results The research identifies the main issues and limitations relating to the application of the existing methodological recommendations. It also finds key areas for revising and supplementing them. In particular, we suggest setting up a system of financial coefficients that would arrange for applying forecast models of corporate financial standing. We present what results can be achieved through analysis of tax returns.
     Conclusions and Relevance Analysis of financial reporting is reasonable to perform concurrently with analysis of tax returns since it is important to evaluate the debtor's financial position. However, purposes, methods and procedures of the analysis should strictly correlate with information scope of those sources. Methodological requirements should not be too stringent. It is difficult to reach such balance. However, it is important to ensure the quality and efficiency of receivership.

Keywords: evaluation, financial condition, company, insolvency, analysis, bankruptcy procedure

References:

  1. Akulova N.G., Ryakhovskii D.I. Problemy kachestva finansovogo analiza v protsedurakh, primenyaemykh v dele o bankrotstve [Issues of the financial analysis quality as part of bankruptcy procedures]. Effektivnoe antikrizisnoe upravlenie = Effective Crisis Management, 2014, no. 6, pp. 74–83.
  2. Dushanina E. Kakie standarty nuzhny arbitrazhnym upravlyayushchim [What standards do court-appointed administrators need?]. Effektivnoe antikrizisnoe upravlenie = Effective Crisis Management, 2011, no. 2, pp. 24–31.
  3. Zaretskaya V.G. Evolyutsiya finansovoi otchetnosti v RF i ee vliyanie na protseduru analiza finansovogo sostoyaniya [The evolution of financial accounts in the Russian Federation and its influence on the financial position analysis]. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya = Financial Analytics: Science and Experience, 2011, no. 29, pp. 57–62.
  4. Ivanov V.V., Tsytovich N.N. Korporativnoe finansovoe planirovanie [Corporate financial planning]. St. Petersburg, BAN, Nestor-Istoriya Publ., 2009, 332 p.
  5. Kal'varskii G.V., L'vova N.A. Finansovaya diagnostika krizisnogo predpriyatiya [Financial diagnostics of a distressed enterprise]. Effektivnoe antikrizisnoe upravlenie = Effective Crisis Management, 2012, no. 3, pp. 94–103.
  6. Kovan S.E. Problemy razvitiya reabilitatsionnogo potentsiala instituta bankrotstva [Issues of developing the recovery potential of the bankruptcy institution]. Effektivnoe antikrizisnoe upravlenie = Effective Crisis Management, 2014, no. 2, pp. 64–75.
  7. Kovan S.E., Ryakhovskaya A.N., Kotsyuba N.V. Sistemnye problemy bankrotstva v Rossii [System issues of bankruptcy in Russia]. Effektivnoe antikrizisnoe upravlenie = Effective Crisis Management, 2014, no. 4, pp. 56–63.
  8. L'vova N.A. Finansovaya diagnostika rossiiskikh predpriyatii s primeneniem modeli Al'tmana dlya razvitykh i formiruyushchikhsya rynkov [Financial diagnostics of Russian enterprises with the Altman’s model application for developed and emerging markets]. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya = Financial Analytics: Science and Experience, 2015, no. 7, pp. 37–45.
  9. Mamaeva A.V. Problemy prinyatiya resheniya ob opredelenii real'noi vozmozhnosti vosstanovleniya platezhesposobnosti krizisnoi organizatsii [Issues of making judgments on a real possibility to recover solvency of a distressed organization]. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya = Financial Analytics: Science and Experience, 2013, no. 43, pp. 29–34.
  10. Pyatov M.L. Evolyutsiya metodologii bukhgalterskogo ucheta v ramkakh balansovoi modeli firmy [The evolution of the accounting methodology within a balance sheet model of the firm]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 5 Ekonomika = Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 5 Economics, 2014, no. 4, pp. 56–75.
  11. Rudakova O.Yu., Rudakova T.A. Polnota i dostovernost' finansovogo analiza dolzhnika v protsedurakh bankrotstva [Completeness and accuracy of the debtor’s financial analysis in bankruptcy proceedings]. Effektivnoe antikrizisnoe upravlenie = Effective Crisis Management, 2013, no. 1, pp. 76–83.
  12. Ryakhovskaya A.N., Kovan S.E., Alferov V.N. Standarty dlya arbitrazhnykh upravlyayushchikh: predlozheniya, obosnovaniya [Standards for court-appointed administrators: proposals, reasons]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  13. Sokolov Ya.V., Pyatov M.L. Bukhgalterskii uchet dlya rukovoditelya [Accounting for the executive]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2008, 232 p.
  14. Tolpegina O.A. Sistema otsenochnykh pokazatelei platezhesposobnosti v finansovoi diagnostike [A system of solvency indicators in financial diagnostics]. Effektivnoe antikrizisnoe upravlenie = Effective Crisis Management, 2013, no. 1, pp. 62–69.
  15. Chernova M.V. Audit i analiz pri bankrotstve: teoriya i praktika: monografiya [Audit and analysis in case of bankruptcy: theory and practice: a monograph]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2015, 208 p.
  16. Altman E. Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis, and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 1968, September, pp. 589–609.
  17. Altman E.I., Hotchkiss E. Corporate Financial Distress & Bankruptcy: Predict and Avoid Bankruptcy, Analyze and Invest in Distressed Debt. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
  18. Beaver W.H. Financial Ratios as Predictors of Failure. Empirical Research in Accounting: Selected Studies. Supplement to Journal of Accounting Research, 1966, vol. 4, pp. 71–111.
  19. Hotchkiss E.S., Kose J., Mooradian R.M., Thorburn K.S. Bankruptcy and the Resolution of Financial Distress. Eckbo E. Handbook of Empirical Corporate Finance, vol. 2. Elsevier, 2008.
  20. Ohlson J.A. Financial Ratios and the Probabilistic Prediction of Bankruptcy. Journal of Accounting Research, 1980, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 109–131.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-9381 (Online)
ISSN 2073-5081 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 27, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive