+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ÈÄ «Ôèíàíñû è êðåäèò»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
International Accounting
 

On fair value measurement of accounting objects

Vol. 18, Iss. 1, JANUARY 2015

Available online: 15 March 2015

Subject Heading: NATIONAL STANDARDS OF ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 2-11

Polenova S.N. Financial University under Government of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
polenov_d@mail.ru

The issues of Russian companies' assets and liabilities measurement at fair value are most complex and disputable. They depend on numerous problems relating to convergence of Russian regulations with the rules of International Financial Reporting Standards. The main reason of these difficulties is the fact that despite the proposals of researchers to use different valuation basis, including replacement cost, market value, residual value and fair value, and analyze their implications for accounting records and accounting and financial statements, Russian statutory regulations prescribe valuation at market prices only in exceptional instances. Most of the national accounting and reporting standards apply historical cost to value accounting objects. However, the convergence of Russian Accounting Standards with International Financial Reporting Standards necessitates stepping up the analysis of advantages and disadvantages of using fair value. The article presents the author's viewpoint on the problem, which depends on the purposes of presentation to interested users of accounting and reporting information generated based on fair value measurement of accounting objects. Given the current developments in economy transformation, increasing signs of crisis, trends in capital flow and stock market development, American practice of applying fair value, prevalence of 'short-termism', i.e. focus on short-term gains rather than long-term success or stability in the American accounting practice, which is conditioned by speculative nature of the main volume of transactions in capital markets, the author concludes on the need for in-depth analysis of consequences of applying fair value when generating financial statements by Russian companies. The national securities and financial instruments market development should be the key approach to fair value measurement.

Keywords: fair value, historical cost, evolution, International Financial Reporting Standards, accounting information, objective, financial statements

References:

  1. Alekseeva G.I. Novye trebovaniya k otsenke po spravedlivoi stoimosti [New requirements to fair value measurement]. Bankovskoe delo = Banking, 2012, no. 10, pp. 40–44.
  2. Artemenkov I.L. Evolyutsiya ponyatiya ‘spravedlivaya stoimost'’ v Mezhdunarodnykh standartakh finansovoi otchetnosti [The evolution of the fair value concept in International Financial Reporting Standards]. Voprosy otsenki = The Appraisal Issues, 2008, no. 2, pp. 2–11.
  3. Archakova M.B. Spravedlivaya stoimost' kak ekonomicheskaya kategoriya [Fair value as an economic category]. Audit i finansovyi analiz = Audit and Financial Analysis, 2014, no. 3, pp. 39–43.
  4. Bogle J. Investory protiv spekulyantov. Kto na samom dele upravlyaet fondovym rynkom [The Clash of the Cultures: Investment vs. Speculation]. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov i Ferber Publ., 2014, 368 p.
  5. Vorontsovskii A.V. Sovremennye teorii rynka kapitala [Modern theories of the capital market]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 2010, 719 p.
  6. Galagan A.M. Uchebnik schetovodstva [A manual of bookkeeping]. Moscow, Izdanie knizhnogo magazina Vysshaya shkola, 1916, 382 p.
  7. Kalaida O.M. Printsipy formirovaniya otsenki i ikh obuslovlennost' trebovaniyami bukhgalterskogo ucheta [The principles of making estimates and their dependence on accounting requirements]. Uchet i statistika = Accounting and Statistics, 2008, no. 12, pp. 26–30.
  8. King A. Otsenka spravedlivoi stoimosti dlya finansovoi otchetnosti: Novye trebovaniya FASB [Fair Value for Financial Reporting: Meeting the New FASB Requirements]. Moscow, Al'pina Publ., 2012, 360 p.
  9. Kovalev V.V., Kovalev Vit.V. Finansovaya otchetnost'. Analiz finansovoi otchetnosti (osnovy balansovedeniya) [Financial reporting. The analysis of financial reporting (the fundamentals of accounting study)]. Moscow, TK Velbi, Prospekt Publ., 2006, 432 p.
  10. Kuvaldina T.B., Lapin D.R. Sushchnost' i klassifikatsiya otsenok v tselyakh bukhgalterskogo ucheta i otchetnosti [Essence and classification of estimates for accounting and reporting purposes]. Sibirskaya finansovaya shkola = Siberian Financial School, 2013, no. 5, pp. 77–80.
  11. Kuz'menko O.A., Novoselova M.A. Otsenka po spravedlivoi stoimosti [Fair value measurement]. Akademicheskii vestnik TGAMEUP = Academic Bulletin of Tyumen State Academy of World Economy, Management and Law, 2013, no. 2, pp. 308–316.
  12. Mezhdunarodnyi standart finansovoi otchetnosti IFRS 13 “Otsenka spravedlivoi stoimosti” [International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 13 Fair Value Measurement]. Available at: Link no_date/2013/prilozhenie_¹_7_-_RU_GVT_IFRS_13_May_2011.pdf. (In Russ.)
  13. Mislavskaya N.A. Kontseptual'naya problema primeneniya otsenki po spravedlivoi stoimosti [The conceptual problem of using fair value measurement]. Audit i finansovyi analiz = Audit and Financial Analysis, 2014, no. 4, pp. 21–24.
  14. Nekhamkin A., Nifaeva O. “Provaly rynka”: moral'nyi aspect [“Market failures”: a moral aspect]. Obshchestvo i ekonomika = Society and Economics, 2013, no. 11-12, pp. 166–171.
  15. Palii V.F., Sokolov Ya.V. ASU i problemy teorii bukhgalterskogo ucheta [ACS and problems of accounting theory]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 1981, 244 p.
  16. Parasotskaya N.N., Yurasova I.Yu. Uchet aktivov po spravedlivoi stoimosti: problemy i perspektivy [Asset accounting at fair value: problems and prospects]. Birzha intellektual'noi sobstvennosti = Intellectual Property Exchange, 2012, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 19–28.
  17. Polenova S.N. Problemy perekhoda rossiiskikh organizatsii na MSFO [The problems of Russian organizations’ transition to IFRS]. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting, 2008, no. 9, pp. 9–17.
  18. Polenova S.N. Standartizatsiya bukhgalterskogo ucheta i otchetnosti. Rossiiskii i mezhdunarodnyi opyt: monografiya [Standardization of accounting and reporting. Russian and international experience: a monograph]. Moscow, Dashkov and K Publ., 2012, 348 p.
  19. Pronyaeva L.I. Problemy ucheta aktivov po spravedlivoi stoimosti [The problems of asset accounting at fair value]. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting, 2010, no. 4, pp. 37–44.
  20. Pyatov M.L. Otsenka po spravedlivoi stoimosti: evolyutsiya i sovremennost' [Fair value measurement: evolution and the modern era]. Bukhgalterskii uchet = Accounting, 2014, no. 7, pp. 84–92.
  21. Stotskii V.I. Osnovy kal'kulyatsii i ekonomicheskogo analiza sebestoimosti [Fundamentals of cost estimate and economic analysis of cost]. Leningrad, OGIZ Publ., 1936, 538 p.
  22. Chaldaeva L.A., Usatyuk T.M. Obosnovanie tselesoobraznosti ispol'zovaniya otsenki po spravedlivoi stoimosti v tselyakh povysheniya dostovernosti otrazheniya ob”ektov v uchete i otchetnosti [Substantiating the practicability of using fair value measurement to increase reliability of accounting records and financial statements]. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting, 2014, no. 38, pp. 2–7.
  23. Hoffmann S.A. A Historical View on the Political Fair Value Debate in Germany. Available at: Link.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-9381 (Online)
ISSN 2073-5081 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 27, Iss. 4
April 2024

Archive