+7 925 966 4690, 9am6pm (GMT+3), Monday – Friday
ÈÄ «Ôèíàíñû è êðåäèò»

JOURNALS

  

FOR AUTHORS

  

SUBSCRIBE

    
Financial Analytics: Science and Experience
 

Comparative evaluation of sectoral investment attractiveness with a territorial binding: an instrumental and methodological approach

Vol. 8, Iss. 5, FEBRUARY 2015

PDF  Article PDF Version

Available online: 6 February 2015

Subject Heading: Investment policy

JEL Classification: 

Pages: 2-9

Dukanich L.V. Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russian Federation
ludmila@ranepa.ru

Importance Due to the limited investment resources in the RF regions during the post-crisis period, the problem of objective evaluation of territories' investment potential and the selection of attractive investment activities for them get a particular relevance and practical significance.
     Objectives In addition to ensuring the reliability of estimates, it is very important, in particular, for the purpose of the regular monitoring of the regions' investment potential, to be able to evaluate them using the clearly designed and mathematically correct algorithm. It gives the possibility to automate calculation procedures and to organize data storage.
     Methods In the article, I offer the methodological and instrumental approaches to solve the problem of comparative assessment of the investment potential of regions' territories and the choice of their attractive investment activities. The paper proposes a methodological approach to solving the comprehensive task of selecting territories and attractive investment activities in the multi-criteria environment using the TOPSIS method. The approbation of the proposed instruments is realized by using the Federal Districts of the Russian Federation case study.
     Results While realizing the TOPSIS algorithm, I have received integral evaluations of the Federal Districts' investment potential with the involvement of eleven individual criteria.
     Conclusions and Relevance I conclude that the application of the TOPSIS method for multi-criteria evaluation of investment potential and economic activities for regions' territories enables to improve significantly the validity of investment decisions due to the following reasons: a mathematically sound and relatively simple algorithm for calculating integrated estimates; possibility of multi-criteria formulation of the problem without limitation of the number of criteria involved; minimization of subjective factors impact; the possibility to use integrated assessments as the rating of the territories and to organize the monitoring of investment attractiveness on their basis.

Keywords: investment, potential, territory, investment attractiveness, branch, private indicator, integrated estimation, TOPSIS method

References:

  1. Ageenko A.A. Metodologicheskie podkhody k otsenke investitsionnoi privlekatel'nosti otraslei ekonomiki regiona i otdel'nykh khozyaistvuyushchikh sub"ektov [Methodological approaches to the investment attractiveness evaluation of economic sectors of a region and certain economic entities]. Voprosy Statistiki, 2003, no. 6, pp. 48–51.
  2. Asaul A.N., Karpov B.M., Perevyazkin V.B., Starovoitov M.K. Modernizatsiya ekonomiki na osnove tekhnologicheskikh innovatsii [Economy modernization on the basis of technological innovation]. St. Petersburg, ANO IPEV Publ., 2008, 606 p.
  3. Belen'kaya O. Reiting investitsionnoi privlekatel'nosti otraslei rossiiskoi ekonomiki [A rating of the investment attractiveness of the Russian economic sectors]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  4. Bereznev S.V., Mamzina T.F., Nacheva M.K., et al. Formirovanie i otsenka investitsionnogo potentsiala regiona [Formation and evaluation of a region’s investment potential]. Moscow, Ekonomicheskaya gazeta Publ., 2012, 234 p.
  5. Blyum E.A. Obzor metodik otsenki investitsionnogo potentsiala regionov [A review of techniques of the evaluation of regions’ investment potential]. Molodoi uchenyi = Young scientist, 2013, no. 7, pp. 137–141.
  6. Dukanich L.V., Selyutin V.V. Sistemnyi analiz. Uchebno-metodicheskie materialy [A system analysis. Educational and methodological materials]. Rostov-on-Don, TsBRR Publ., 2003, 35 p.
  7. Kobozev O.V. Ekspertnyi i statisticheskii metody otsenki investitsionnoi privlekatel'nosti regiona [Expert and statistical methods of the evaluation of region’s investment potential]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  8. Korchagin Yu.A. Regional'naya finansovaya politika i ekonomika [Regional financial policies and economics]. Rostov-on-Don, Feniks Publ., 2006, 284 p.
  9. Kuznetsov Yu.A., Perova V.I., Eivazova E.N. Neirosetevoe modelirovanie dinamiki innovatsionnogo razvitiya regionov Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Neural network modeling of the dynamics of an innovative development of the Russian Federation regions]. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika = Regional economics: theory and practice, 2014, no. 4, pp. 18–28.
  10. Mel'nikov R.M. Otsenka effektivnosti i puti optimizatsii investitsionnoi politiki sub"ektov Federatsii [The efficiency evaluation and ways to optimize investment policies of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation]. Federalizm = Federalism, 2007, no. 2, pp. 47–66.
  11. Report on the State contract “Technique of an assessment of investment attractiveness of regions of the "Expert RA" rating agency”. Appendix 2. “The basic methodological provisions of an assessment of the investment climate of a territory” of July 9, 2008 ¹ 127. (In Russ.)
  12. Nalogovaya nagruzka po vidam ekonomicheskoi deyatel'nosti [Tax burden in terms of types of economic activity]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  13. Ometova E.V. Otsenka investitsionnoi privlekatel'nosti regionov Rossii. Voprosy upravleniya predpriyatiem [Evaluation of the investment attractiveness of Russia’s regions. The issues of an enterprise management]. Voprosy upravleniya predpriyatiem = Issues of enterprise management, 2007, no. 2, pp. 54–56.
  14. Parfenov G.A. Problemy i oshibki pri otsenke effektivnosti investitsionnykh proektov [Problems and errors in assessing the efficiency of investment projects]. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic analysis: theory and practice, 2005, no. 14, pp. 7–15.
  15. Popova G.L. Nalogovyi potentsial regionov: finansovo-ekonomicheskii analiz i klassifikatsiya [Tax potential of regions: economic and financial analyses and classification]. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya = Financial analytics: science and experience, 2012, no. 16, pp. 25–32.
  16. Smaglyukova T.M. Metodika kompleksnoi otsenki investitsionnoi privlekatel'nosti regionov s uchetom ikh otraslevoi spetsializatsii [A comprehensive assessment technique of regions’ investment attractiveness taking into account their sectorial specialization]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  17. Torchilkin M.K. Analiz metodov otsenki investitsionnoi privlekatel'nosti regionov [An analysis of techniques of the regions’ investment attractiveness evaluation]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  18. Ulanova E.M. Metodika otsenki regional'no-otraslevogo riska investirovaniya [An evaluation technique of region and industrial risk investment]. Voprosy otsenki = Evaluation issues, 2005, no. 3, pp. 9–14.
  19. Fetisov G.G. Metody otsenki investitsionnogo klimata regionov Rossii i puti ego uluchsheniya [Evaluation techniques of the investment climate of Russian regions and ways of its improvement]. Available at: Link. (In Russ.)
  20. Shevchenko I.V., Zhabin V.V. Puti sovershenstvovaniya metodik otsenki investitsionnogo klimata regionov [Ways of perfection of the evaluation techniques of regions’ investment climate]. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika = Regional economics: theory and practice, 2007, no. 14, pp. 47–52.
  21. Madgid Tavana, Adel Hatami-Marbini. A group AHP-TOPSIS framework for human spaceflight mission planning at NASA. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, no. 38, pp. 13588–13603.

View all articles of issue

 

ISSN 2311-8768 (Online)
ISSN 2073-4484 (Print)

Journal current issue

Vol. 17, Iss. 1
March 2024

Archive