Forecasting the dynamics of the impact of scientific research activities on regional socioeconomic development under conditions of sociocultural barriers
Tat’yana A. KONEVAUral Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin (UrFU), Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation Simakova0212@gmail.com ORCID id: not available
Danil R. GAMALEEVUral Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin (UrFU), Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation danil.gamaleev@bk.ru ORCID id: not available
Veronika A. MESHKOVAUral Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin (UrFU), Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation vermesh_2@mail.ru ORCID id: not available
Kseniya A. SANNIKOVAUral Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin (UrFU), Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation ksyu.sannikova.02@bk.ru ORCID id: not available
Alesya I. PUSHKAREVAUral Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin (UrFU), Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation aaallleeesss@ya.ru ORCID id: not available
Subject. Spatial heterogeneity of the subjects of the Russian Federation, implementation of the country's scientific potential. Objectives. Assessment of the distribution of regions of the Russian Federation by the degree of influence of research activities on the parameters of socioeconomic development. Methods. The index method, as well as various methods of multivariate statistical analysis. Results. In a number of subjects of the Russian Federation, a high level of development in research activities does not contribute to achieving a high level of socioeconomic indicators, which indicates the presence of institutional and socio-cultural constraints. Conclusions. The results of the study can be taken into account when developing a differentiated regional policy aimed at supporting scientific research and ensuring innovative growth.
Romer P.M. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, vol. 98, iss. 5, part 2, pp. 71–102. DOI: 10.1086/261725
North D.C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, 1990, 152 p.
Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relations. Research Policy, 2000, vol. 29, iss. 2, pp. 109–123. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Arrow K.J. The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 1962, vol. 29, iss. 3, pp. 155–173. DOI: 10.2307/2295952
Cooke P., Uranga M.G., Etxebarria G. Regional Innovation Systems: Institutional and Organisational Dimensions. Research Policy, 1997, vol. 26, iss. 4-5, pp. 475–491. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5
Inglehart R., Welzel C. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge University Press, 2005, 333 p.
Zubarevich N.V. [Regional development and regional policy in Russia]. EKO, 2014, no. 4, pp. 6–27. (In Russ.) EDN: RZLYST
Glaeser E. Triumph of the City: How Our Greatest Invention Makes Us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier, and Happier. Penguin, 2011, 352 p.
Mazzucato M. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. Anthem Press, 2013, 266 p.
Porter M.E. Clusters and the New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 1998, vol. 76, iss. 6, pp. 77–90.
Glazyev S.Yu. Strategiya operezhayushchego razvitiya Rossii v usloviyakh global'nogo krizisa: monografiya [Strategy of advanced development of Russia in the context of the global crisis: a monograph]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 2010, 254 p.
Kleiner G.B. Sistemnaya ekonomika: shagi razvitiya: monografiya [System economics: steps of development: a monograph]. Moscow, Nauchnaya biblioteka Publ., 2021, 746 p.
